Advertisement

Biological Cybernetics

, Volume 107, Issue 2, pp 201–216 | Cite as

Contributions of phase resetting and interlimb coordination to the adaptive control of hindlimb obstacle avoidance during locomotion in rats: a simulation study

  • Shinya AoiEmail author
  • Takahiro Kondo
  • Naohiro Hayashi
  • Dai Yanagihara
  • Sho Aoki
  • Hiroshi Yamaura
  • Naomichi Ogihara
  • Tetsuro Funato
  • Nozomi Tomita
  • Kei Senda
  • Kazuo Tsuchiya
Original Paper

Abstract

Obstacle avoidance during locomotion is essential for safe, smooth locomotion. Physiological studies regarding muscle synergy have shown that the combination of a small number of basic patterns produces the large part of muscle activities during locomotion and the addition of another pattern explains muscle activities for obstacle avoidance. Furthermore, central pattern generators in the spinal cord are thought to manage the timing to produce such basic patterns. In the present study, we investigated sensory-motor coordination for obstacle avoidance by the hindlimbs of the rat using a neuromusculoskeletal model. We constructed the musculoskeletal part of the model based on empirical anatomical data of the rat and the nervous system model based on the aforementioned physiological findings of central pattern generators and muscle synergy. To verify the dynamic simulation by the constructed model, we compared the simulation results with kinematic and electromyographic data measured during actual locomotion in rats. In addition, we incorporated sensory regulation models based on physiological evidence of phase resetting and interlimb coordination and examined their functional roles in stepping over an obstacle during locomotion. Our results show that the phase regulation based on interlimb coordination contributes to stepping over a higher obstacle and that based on phase resetting contributes to quick recovery after stepping over the obstacle. These results suggest the importance of sensory regulation in generating successful obstacle avoidance during locomotion.

Keywords

Rat Locomotion Obstacle avoidance Neuromusculoskeletal model Central pattern generator Muscle synergy Phase resetting Interlimb coordination 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This paper is supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B) No. 23360111 and a Grant-in-Aid for Creative Scientific Research No. 19GS0208 from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan.

References

  1. Akay T, Acharya HJ, Fouad K, Pearson KG (2006) Behavioral and electromyographic characterization of mice lacking EphA4 receptors. J Neurophysiol 96:642–651PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aoi S, Ogihara N, Funato T, Sugimoto Y, Tsuchiya K (2010) Evaluating functional roles of phase resetting in generation of adaptive human bipedal walking with a physiologically based model of the spinal pattern generator. Biol Cybern 102(5):373–387PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aoi S, Ogihara N, Funato T, Tsuchiya K (2012) Sensory regulation of stance-to-swing transition in generation of adaptive human walking: a simulation study. Robot Auton Syst 60(5):685–691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Asai Y, Tasaka Y, Nomura K, Nomura T, Casadio M, Morasso P (2009) A model of postural control in quiet standing: robust compensation of delay-induced instability using intermittent activation of feedback control. PLoS ONE 4(7):e6169PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Austin GP, Garrett GE, Bohannon RW (1999) Kinematic analysis of obstacle clearance during locomotion. Gait Posture 10:109–120PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bosco G, Poppele RE (2001) Proprioception from a spinocerebellar perspective. Physiol Rev 81:539–568PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Burke RE, Degtyarenko AM, Simon ES (2001) Patterns of locomotor drive to motoneurons and last-order interneurons: clues to the structure of the CPG. J Neurophysiol 86:447–462PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Burkholder TJ, Nichols TR (2004) Three-dimensional model of the feline hindlimb. J Morph 261(1):118–129PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cappellini G, Ivanenko YP, Poppele RE, Lacquaniti F (2006) Motor patterns in human walking and running. J Neurophysiol 95:3426–3437PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Casabona A, Valle MS, Bosco G, Garifoli A, Lombardo SA, Perciavalle V (2003) Anisotropic representation of forelimb position in the cerebellar cortex and nucleus interpositus of the rat. Brain Res 972:127–136Google Scholar
  11. Casabona A, Valle MS, Bosco G, Perciavalle V (2004) Cerebellar encoding of limb position. Cerebellum 3:172–177PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chonga RKY, Chastan N, Welter ML, Do MC (2009) Age-related changes in the center of mass velocity control during walking. Neurosci Lett 458:23–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chou LS, Draganich LF (1998) Increasing obstacle height and decreasing toe-obstacle distance affect the joint moments of the stance limb differently when stepping over an obstacle. Gait Posture 8:186–204PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Conway BA, Hultborn H, Kiehn O (1987) Proprioceptive input resets central locomotor rhythm in the spinal cat. Exp Brain Res 68: 643–656Google Scholar
  15. d’Avella A, Bizzi E (2005) Shared and specific muscle synergies in natural motor behaviors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102(8):3076–3081PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. d’Avella A, Saltiel P, Bizzi E (2003) Combinations of muscle synergies in the construction of a natural motor behavior. Nat Neurosci 6: 300–308Google Scholar
  17. Dominici N, Ivanenko YP, Cappellini G, d’Avella A, Mondì V, Cicchese M, Fabiano A, Silei T, Di Paolo A, Giannini C, Poppele RE, Lacquaniti F (2011) Locomotor primitives in newborn babies and their development. Science 334(6058):997–999Google Scholar
  18. Drew T, Kalaska J, Krouchev N (2008) Muscle synergies during locomotion in the cat: a model for motor cortex control. J Physiol 586(5):1239–1245PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Duysens J (1977) Fluctuations in sensitivity to rhythm resetting effects during the cat’s step cycle. Brain Res 133(1):190–195PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Duysens J, Pearson KG (1980) Inhibition of flexor burst generation by loading ankle extensor muscles in walking cats. Brain Res 187: 321–332Google Scholar
  21. Duysens J, Clarac F, Cruse H (2000) Load-regulating mechanisms in gait and posture: comparative aspects. Physiol Rev 80:83–133PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Ekeberg Ö, Pearson K (2005) Computer simulation of stepping in the hind legs of the cat: an examination of mechanisms regulating the stance-to-swing transition. J Neurophysiol 94:4256–4268PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Forssberg H, Grillner S (1973) The locomotion of the acute spinal cat injected with clonidine i.v. Brain Res 50:184–186PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Grillner S (1975) Locomotion in vertebrates: central mechanisms and reflex interaction. Physiol Rev 55(2):247–304PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gruner JA, Altman J, Spivack N (1980) Effects of arrested cerebellar development on locomotion in the rat cinematographic and electromyographic analysis. Exp Brain Res 40:361–373PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Guertin PA (2009) The mammalian central pattern generator for locomotion. Brain Res Rev 62:45–56PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Guertin P, Angel MJ, Perreault M-C, McCrea DA (1995) Ankle extensor group I afferents excite extensors throughout the hindlimb during fictive locomotion in the cat. J Physiol 487(1):197–209PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Ichise T, Kano M, Hashimoto K, Yanagihara D, Nakao K, Shigemoto R, Katsuki M, Aiba A (2000) mGluR1 in cerebellar Purkinje cells essential for long-term depression, synapse elimination, and motor coordination. Science 288(5472):1832–1835PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ivanenko YP, Poppele RE, Lacquaniti F (2004) Five basic muscle activation patterns account for muscle activity during human locomotion. J Physiol 556:267–282PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ivanenko YP, Cappellini G, Dominici N, Poppele RE, Lacquaniti F (2005) Coordination of locomotion with voluntary movements in humans. J Neurosci 25(31):7238–7253PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ivanenko YP, Poppele RE, Lacquaniti F (2006) Motor control programs and walking. Neuroscientist 12(4):339–348PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ivashko DG, Prilutsky BI, Markin SN, Chapin JK, Rybak IA (2003) Modeling the spinal cord neural circuitry controlling cat hindlimb movement during locomotion. Neurocomputing 52–54:621–629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jo S, Massaquoi SG (2007) A model of cerebrocerebello-spinomuscular interaction in the sagittal control of human walking. Biol Cybern 96:279–307PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jo S (2008) Hypothetical neural control of human bipedal walking with voluntary modulation. Med Biol Eng Comput 46:179–193PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Johnson WL, Jindrich DL, Roy RR, Edgerton VR (2008) A three-dimensional model of the rat hindlimb: musculoskeletal geometry and muscle moment arms. J Biomech 41(3):610–619PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kondo T, Aoi S, Yanagihara D, Aoki S, Yamaura H, Ogihara N, Ichikawa A, Tsuchiya K (2010) Development of a musculoskeletal model of the hind legs of the rat based on anatomical data and generation of locomotion based on kinematic data. In: Proceedings of the SICE Annual Conference, pp 2308–2310Google Scholar
  37. Lafreniere-Roula M, McCrea DA (2005) Deletions of rhythmic motoneuron activity during fictive locomotion and scratch provide clues to the organization of the mammalian central pattern generator. J Neurophysiol 94:1120–1132PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Latash ML (2008) Synergy. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lockhart DB, Ting LH (2007) Optimal sensorimotor transformations for balance. Nat Neurosci 10(10):1329–1336PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Markin SN, Klishko AN, Shevtsova NA, Lemay MA, Prilutsky BI, Rybak IA (2010) Afferent control of locomotor CPG: insights from a simple neuromechanical model. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1198:21–34PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Masani K, Popovic MR, Nakazawa K, Kouzaki M, Nozaki D (2003) Importance of body sway velocity information in controlling ankle extensor activities during quiet stance. J Neurophysiol 90:3774–3782PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Masani K, Vette AH, Popovic MR (2006) Controlling balance during quiet standing: proportional and derivative controller generates preceding motor command to bodysway position observed in experiments. Gait Posture 23(2):164–172PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Maurer C, Peterka RJ (2005) A new interpretation of spontaneous sway measures based on a simple model of human postural control. J Neurophysiol 93:189–200PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. McCrea DA, Rybak IA (2008) Organization of mammalian locomotor rhythm and pattern generation. Brain Res Rev 57:134–146PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Muramatsu H, Suzuki K, Sasaki T, Matsumoto M, Sakuma J, Oinuma M, Itakura T, Kodama N (2009) Evoked potentials elicited on the cerebellar cortex by electrical stimulation of the rat spinocerebellar tract. Surg Neurol 72:395–400PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Orlovsky GN, Deliagina T, Grillner S (1999) Neuronal control of locomotion: from mollusc to man. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Patla AE, Greig M (2006) Any way you look at it, successful obstacle negotiation needs visually guided on-line foot placement regulation during the approach phase. Neurosci Lett 397:110–114PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pearson KG, Acharya H, Fouad K (2005) A new electrode configuration for recording electromyographic activity in behaving mice. J Neurosci Meth 148:36–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Peterka RJ (2000) Postural control model interpretation of stabilogram diffusion analysis. Biol Cybern 82:335–343PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Poppele RE, Bosco G (2003) Sophisticated spinal contributions to motor control. Trends Neurosci 26:269–276PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Poppele RE, Bosco G, Rankin AM (2002) Independent representations of limb axis length and orientation in spinocerebellar response components. J Neurophysiol 87:409–422PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Rybak IA, Shevtsova NA, Lafreniere-Roula M, McCrea DA (2006a) Modelling spinal circuitry involved in locomotor pattern generation: insights from deletions during fictive locomotion. J Physiol 577(2):617–639Google Scholar
  53. Rybak IA, Stecina K, Shevtsova NA, McCrea DA (2006b) Modelling spinal circuitry involved in locomotor pattern generation: insights from the effects of afferent stimulation. J Physiol 577(2):641–658Google Scholar
  54. Sato Y, Aoki S, Yanagihara D (2012) Gait modification during approach phase when stepping over an obstacle in rats. Neurosci Res 72(3):263–269PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Schomburg ED, Petersen N, Barajon I, Hultborn H (1998) Flexor reflex afferents reset the step cycle during fictive locomotion in the cat. Exp Brain Res 122(3):339–350PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Shik ML, Orlovsky GN (1976) Neurophysiology of locomotor automatism. Physiol Rev 56(3):465–501PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Taga G (1995) A model of the neuro-musculo-skeletal system for human locomotion I. Emergence of basic gait. Biol Cybern 73:97–111PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Taga G (1998) A model of the neuro-musculo-skeletal system for anticipatory adjustment of human locomotion during obstacle avoidance. Biol Cybern 78:9–17PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Taga G, Yamaguchi Y, Shimizu H (1991) Self-organized control of bipedal locomotion by neural oscillators in unpredictable environment. Biol Cybern 65:147–159 Google Scholar
  60. Ting LH, Macpherson JM (2005) A limited set of muscle synergies for force control during a postural task. J Neurophysiol 93:609–613Google Scholar
  61. Todorov E, Jordan MI (2002) Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination. Nat Neurosci 5:1226–1235PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Welch TDJ, Ting LH (2008) A feedback model reproduces muscle activity during human postural responses to support-surface translations. J Neurophysiol 99:1032–1038PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Yakovenko S, Gritsenko V, Prochazka A (2004) Contribution of stretch reflexes to locomotor control: a modeling study. Biol Cybern 90: 146–155Google Scholar
  64. Yamasaki T, Nomura T, Sato S (2003a) Phase reset and dynamic stability during human gait. BioSystems 71:221–232Google Scholar
  65. Yamasaki T, Nomura T, Sato S (2003b) Possible functional roles of phase resetting during walking. Biol Cybern 88:468–496Google Scholar
  66. Yanagihara D, Kondo I (1996) Nitric oxide plays a key role in adaptive control of locomotion in cat. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 13292–13297Google Scholar
  67. Yanagihara D, Udo M, Kondo I, Yoshida T (1993) A new learning paradigm: adaptive changes in interlimb coordination during perturbed locomotion in decerebrate cats. Neurosci Res 18(3):241–244PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shinya Aoi
    • 1
    • 6
    Email author
  • Takahiro Kondo
    • 1
  • Naohiro Hayashi
    • 1
  • Dai Yanagihara
    • 2
    • 6
  • Sho Aoki
    • 2
  • Hiroshi Yamaura
    • 2
  • Naomichi Ogihara
    • 3
    • 6
  • Tetsuro Funato
    • 4
  • Nozomi Tomita
    • 5
    • 6
  • Kei Senda
    • 1
  • Kazuo Tsuchiya
    • 5
    • 6
  1. 1.Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Graduate School of EngineeringKyoto UniversitySakyo-kuJapan
  2. 2.Department of Life Sciences, Graduate School of Arts and SciencesThe University of TokyoMeguro-kuJapan
  3. 3.Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Science and TechnologyKeio UniversityKohoku-kuJapan
  4. 4.Department of Mechanical Engineering and Science, Graduate School of EngineeringKyoto UniversitySakyo-kuJapan
  5. 5.Department of Energy and Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Science and EngineeringDoshisha UniversityKyotanabeJapan
  6. 6.JST, CRESTChiyoda-kuJapan

Personalised recommendations