Action understanding and active inference
- 981 Downloads
We have suggested that the mirror-neuron system might be usefully understood as implementing Bayes-optimal perception of actions emitted by oneself or others. To substantiate this claim, we present neuronal simulations that show the same representations can prescribe motor behavior and encode motor intentions during action–observation. These simulations are based on the free-energy formulation of active inference, which is formally related to predictive coding. In this scheme, (generalised) states of the world are represented as trajectories. When these states include motor trajectories they implicitly entail intentions (future motor states). Optimizing the representation of these intentions enables predictive coding in a prospective sense. Crucially, the same generative models used to make predictions can be deployed to predict the actions of self or others by simply changing the bias or precision (i.e. attention) afforded to proprioceptive signals. We illustrate these points using simulations of handwriting to illustrate neuronally plausible generation and recognition of itinerant (wandering) motor trajectories. We then use the same simulations to produce synthetic electrophysiological responses to violations of intentional expectations. Our results affirm that a Bayes-optimal approach provides a principled framework, which accommodates current thinking about the mirror-neuron system. Furthermore, it endorses the general formulation of action as active inference.
KeywordsAction–observation Mirror-neuron system Inference Precision Free-energy Perception Generative models Predictive coding
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Borghi AM, Gianelli C, Scorolli C (2010) Sentence comprehension: effectors and goals, self and others. An overview of experiments and implications for robotics. Front Neurorobot 4: 3 Jun 14Google Scholar
- Donchin E, Coles MGH (1988) Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating?. Behav Brain Sci 11: 355–372Google Scholar
- Friston K, Stephan K, Li B, Daunizeau J (2010b) Generalised filtering. Math Prob Eng. Article ID 621670Google Scholar
- Ijspeert JA, Nakanishi J, Schaal S (2002) Movement imitation with nonlinear dynamical systems in humanoid robots. In International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA 2002), pp 1398–1403Google Scholar
- Kiebel SJ, Daunizeau J, Friston KJ (2009b) Perception and hierarchical dynamics. Front Neuroinf 3: 20Google Scholar