Biological Cybernetics

, Volume 101, Issue 1, pp 71–80

Short-window spectral analysis using AMVAR and multitaper methods: a comparison

Original Paper

Abstract

We compare two popular methods for estimating the power spectrum from short data windows, namely the adaptive multivariate autoregressive (AMVAR) method and the multitaper method. By analyzing a simulated signal (embedded in a background Ornstein–Uhlenbeck noise process) we demonstrate that the AMVAR method performs better at detecting short bursts of oscillations compared to the multitaper method. However, both methods are immune to jitter in the temporal location of the signal. We also show that coherence can still be detected in noisy bivariate time series data by the AMVAR method even if the individual power spectra fail to show any peaks. Finally, using data from two monkeys performing a visuomotor pattern discrimination task, we demonstrate that the AMVAR method is better able to determine the termination of the beta oscillations when compared to the multitaper method.

Keywords

Spectral analysis AMVAR method Multitaper method 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bartosch L (2001) Generation of colured noise. Int J Modern Phys C 12: 851–855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bressler SL, Coppola R, Nakamura R (1993) Episodic multiregional cortical coherence at multiple frequencies during visual task performance. Nature 366: 153–156PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brovelli A, Ding M, Ledberg A, Chen Y, Nakamura R, Bressler SL (2004) Beta Oscillations in a large-scale sensorimotor cortical network: Directional influences revealed by Granger causality. PNAS 101: 9849–9854PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen Y, Bressler SL, Ding M (2006) Frequency decomposition of conditional Granger causality and application to multivariate neural field potential data. J Neurosci Methods 150: 228–237PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dhamala M, Rangarajan G, Ding M (2008) Estimating Granger causality from Fourier and wavelet transforms of time series data. Phy Rev Lett 100(018701): 1–4Google Scholar
  6. Dhamala M, Rangarajan G, Ding M (2008) Analyzing information flow in brain networks with nonparametric Granger causality. NeuroImage 41: 354–362PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ding M, Bressler SL, Yang W, Liang H (2000) Short-window spectral analysis of cortical event-related potentials by adaptive multivariate autoregressive modelling: data preprocessing, model validation and variability assessment. Biol Cybern 83: 35–45PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gillespie DT (1996) The mathematics of Brownian motion and Johnson noise. Am J Phys 64: 225–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Granger CWJ, Hughes AO (1968) Spectral analysis of short series—a simulation study. J R Stat Soc Ser A 130: 83–99Google Scholar
  10. Jenkins GM, Watts DG (1968) Spectral analysis and its applications. Holden Day, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  11. Kaminski M, Ding M, Truccolo WA, Bressler SL (2001) Evaluating casual relations in neural systems: Granger causality, directed transfer function and statistical assessment of significance. Biol Cybern 85: 145–157PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ledberg A, Bressler SL, Ding M, Coppola R, Nakamura R (2007) Large-scale visuomotor integration in the cerebral cortex. Cereb Cortex 17: 44–62PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Marple SL (1987) Digital spectral analysis with applications. Prentice Hall, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  14. Mitra PP, Pesaran B (1999) Analysis of dynamic brain imaging data. Biophys J 76: 691–708PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Morf M, Vieira A, Lee D, Kailath T (1978) Recursive multichannel maximum entropy spectral estimation. IEEE Trans Geosci Electron 16: 85–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Muthuswamy J, Thakor NV (1998) Spectral analysis methods for neurological signals. J Neurosci Methods 83: 1–14PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Percival DB, Walden AT (1993) Spectral analysis for physical applications. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Percival D, Walden A (2000) Wavelet methods for time series analysis. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  19. Slepian D, Pollak HO (1961) Prolate spheroidal wavefunctions Fourier analysis and uncertainty. I Bell Syst Tech J 40: 43–63Google Scholar
  20. Spyers-Ashby JM, Bain PG, Roberts SJ (1998) A comparison of fast fourier transform (FFT) and autoregressive (AR) spectral estimation techniques for the analysis of tremor data. J Neurosci Methods 83: 35–43PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Thomson DJ (1982) Spectrum estimation and harmonic analysis. Proc IEEE 70: 1055–1096CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Walden AT (2000) A unified view of multitaper multivariate spectral estimation. Biometrika 87: 767–788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Zhang Y, Bressler SL, Chen Y, Nakamura R, Ding M (2005) Beta and gamma synchronization and desynchronization in monkeys during a visual discrimination task. Soc Neurosc Abstr 31 (Prog.No. 413.18)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Applied Research InternationalNew DelhiIndia
  2. 2.Department of Mathematics, Centre for NeuroscienceIndian Institute of ScienceBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations