Advertisement

Biological Cybernetics

, Volume 100, Issue 5, pp 331–350 | Cite as

Movement curvature planning through force field internal models

  • Biljana Petreska
  • Aude BillardEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

Human motion studies have focused primarily on modeling straight point-to-point reaching movements. However, many goal-directed reaching movements, such as movements directed towards oneself, are not straight but rather follow highly curved trajectories. These movements are particularly interesting to study since they are essential in our everyday life, appear early in development and are routinely used to assess movement deficits following brain lesions. We argue that curved and straight-line reaching movements are generated by a unique neural controller and that the observed curvature of the movement is the result of an active control strategy that follows the geometry of one’s body, for instance to avoid trajectories that would hit the body or yield postures close to the joint limits. We present a mathematical model that accounts for such an active control strategy and show that the model reproduces with high accuracy the kinematic features of human data during unconstrained reaching movements directed toward the head. The model consists of a nonlinear dynamical system with a single stable attractor at the target. Embodiment-related task constraints are expressed as a force field that acts on the dynamical system. Finally, we discuss the biological plausibility and neural correlates of the model’s parameters and suggest that embodiment should be considered as a main cause for movement trajectory curvature.

Keywords

Motor control Neural control of movement Dynamical systems Computational model Goal-directed reaching movements 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Admiraal MA, Kusters MJMAM, Gielen SCAM (2004) Modeling kinematics and dynamics of human arm movements. Motor Control 8(3): 312–338PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Ajemian R, Bullock D, Grossberg S (2001) A model of movement coordinates in the motor cortex: posture-dependent changes in the gain and direction of single cell tuning curves. Cereb Cortex 11(12): 1124–1135PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Atkeson CG, Hollerbach JM (1985) Kinematic features of unrestrained vertical arm movements. J Neurosci 5(9): 2318–2330PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bernstein NA (1947) On the construction of movements. Medgiz, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  5. Bernstein NA (1996) Levels of construction of movements. In: Latash ML, Turvey MT(eds) Dexterity and its development. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, pp 115–170Google Scholar
  6. Biess A, Liebermann DG, Flash T (2007) A computational model for redundant human three dimensional pointing movements: integration of independant spatial and temporal motor plans simplifies movement dynamics. J Neurosci 27(48): 13045–13064PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bizzi E, Accornero N, Chapple W, Hogan N (1982) Arm trajectory formation in monkeys. Exp Brain Res 46(1): 139–143PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brenner E, Smeets JBJ (1995) Moving one’s finger to a visually specified position: target orientation influences the finger’s path. Exp Brain Res 105(2): 318–320PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown SH, Cooke JD (1990) Movement-related phasic muscle activation. I. Relations with temporal profile of movement. J Neurophysiol 63(3): 455–464PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Bullock D, Grossberg S (1988) Neural dynamics of planned arm movements: emergent invariants and speed-accuracy properties during trajectory formation. Psychol Rev 95(1): 49–90PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bullock D, Grossberg S, Mannes C (1993) A neural network model for cursive script production. Biol Cybern 70(1): 15–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bullock D, Cisek P, Grossberg S (1998) Cortical networks for control of voluntary arm movements under variable force conditions. Cereb Cortex 8(1): 48–62PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Christel MI, Billard A (2002) Comparison between macaques’ and humans’ kinematics of prehension: the role of morphological differences and control mechanisms. Behav Brain Res 131(1–2): 169–184PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cisek P, Grossberg S, Bullock D (1998) A cortico-spinal model of reaching and proprioception under multiple task constraints. J Cogn Neurosci 10(4): 425–444PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Clamman HP (1969) Statistical analysis of motor unit firing pattern in human skeletal muscle. Biophys J 9: 1233–1251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Clancy EA, Hogan N (1999) Probability density of the surface electromyogram and its relation to amplitude detectors. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 46(6): 730–739PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Conditt MA, Gandolfo F, Mussa-Ivaldi FA (1997) The motor system does not learn the dynamics of the arm by rote memorization of past experience. J Neurophysiol 78(1): 554–560PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Cruse H, Brüwer M (1987) The human arm as a redundant manipulator: the control of path and joint angles. Biol Cybern 57(1–2): 134–144Google Scholar
  19. d’Avella A, Saltiel P, Bizzi E (2003) Combinations of muscle synergies in the construction of a natural motor behavior. Nat Neurosci 6(3): 300–308PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. de Graaf JB, Sittig AC, Denier von der Gon JJ (1991) Misdirections in slow goal-directed arm movements and pointer-setting tasks. Exp Brain Res 84(2): 434–438PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. de Graaf JB, Sittig AC, Denier von der Gon JJ (1994) Misdirections in slow, goal-directed arm movements are not primarily visually based. Exp Brain Res 99(3): 464–472PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dalby JT, Gibson D, Grossi V, Schneider RD (1980) Lateralized hand gesture during speech. J Motor Behav 12(4): 292–297Google Scholar
  23. De Renzi E, Lucchelli F (1988) Ideational apraxia. Brain 111(Pt 5): 1173–1185PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Desmurget M, Grafton S (2000) Forward modeling allows feedback control for fast reaching movements. Trends Cogn Sci 4(11): 423–431PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Desmurget M, Jordan M, Prablanc C, Jeannerod M (1997) Constrained and unconstrained movements involve different control strategies. J Neurophysiol 77(3): 1644–1650PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Fitts PM (1954) The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. J Exp Psychol 47(6): 381–391PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Flash T (1987) The control of hand equilibrium trajectories in multi-joint arm movements. Biol Cybern 57(4–5): 257–274PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Flash T, Hogan N (1985) The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model. J Neurosci 5(7): 1688–1703PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Gandolfo F, Mussa-Ivaldi FA, Bizzi E (1996) Motor learning by field approximation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93(9): 3843–3846PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gielen CCAM, van den Oosten K, Pull ter Gunne F (1985) Relation between EMG activation patterns and kinematic properties of aimed arm movements. J Mot Behav 17(4): 421–442PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Goldenberg G, Hagmann S (1997) The meaning of meaningless gestures: a study of visuo-imitative apraxia. Neuropsychologia 35(3): 333–341PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Graziano MSA, Cooke DF, Taylor CSR (2000) Coding the location of the arm by sight. Science 290(5497): 1782–1786PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Graziano MSA, Taylor CSR, Moore T (2002) Complex movements evoked by microstimulation of precentral cortex. Neuron 34(5): 841–851PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Graziano MSA, Aflalo TNS, Cooke DF (2005) Arm movements evoked by electrical stimulation in the motor cortex of monkeys. J Neurophysiol 94(6): 4209–4223PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Guigon E, Baraduc P, Desmurget M (2007) Computational motor control: redundancy and invariance. J Neurophysiol 97(1): 331–347PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hamilton AFC, Wolpert DM (2002) Controlling the statistics of action: obstacle avoidance. J Neurophysiol 87(5): 2434–2440PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Harris CM, Wolpert DM (1998) Signal-dependent noise determines motor planning. Nature 394(6695): 780–784PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hersch M, Billard A (2007) Reaching with multi-referential dynamical systems. Auton Robot 25(1–2): 71–83Google Scholar
  39. Hoos H, Stützle T (2004) Stochastic local search: Foundations and applications. Elsevier/Morgan Kaufmann, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  40. Klein Breteler MD, Meulenbroek RGJ, Gielen SCAM (1998) Geometric features of workspace and joint-space paths of 3D reaching movements. Acta Psychol 100(1–2): 37–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lacquaniti F, Terzuolo C, Viviani P (1983) The law relating the kinematic and figural aspects of drawing movements. Acta Psychol 54(1–3): 115–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lacquaniti F, Soechting JF, Terzuolo SA (1986) Path constraints on point-to-point arm movements in three-dimensional space. Neuroscience 17(2): 313–324PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lavergne J, Kimura D (1987) Hand movement asymmetry during speech: no effect of speaking topic. Neuropsychologia 25(4): 689–693PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Liebermann DG, Biess A, Gielen CCAM, Flash T (2006) Intrinsic joint kinematic planning. II: Hand-path predictions based on a Listing’s plane constraint. Exp Brain Res 171(2): 155–173PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Liebermann DG, Krasovsky T, Berman S (2008) Planning maximally smooth hand movements constrained to nonplanar workspaces. J Mot Behav 40(6): 516–531PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Matthews PBC (1996) Relationship of firing intervals of human motor units to the trajectory of post-spike after-hyperpolarization and synaptic noise. J Physiol 492(Pt 2): 597–628PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. McIntyre J, Gurfinkel EV, Lipshits MI, Droulez J, Gurfinkel VS (1995) Measurements of human force control during a constrained arm motion using a force-actuated joystick. J Neurophysiol 73(3): 1201–1222PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Miall RC, Haggard PN (1995) The curvature of human arm movements in the absence of visual experience. Exp Brain Res 103(3): 421–428PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Moran DW, Schwartz AB (1999) Motor cortical activity during drawing movements: population representation during spiral tracing. J Neurophysiol 82(5): 2693–2704PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Morasso P (1981) Spatial control of arm movements. Exp Brain Res 42(2): 223–227PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Nakano E, Imamizu H, Osu R, Uno Y, Gomi H, Yoshioka T, Kawato M (1999) Quantitative examinations of internal representations for arm trajectory planning: minimum commanded torque change model. J Neurophysiol 81(5): 2140–2155PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Neter J, Kutner MH, Nachtsheim CJ, Wasserman W (1996) Applied linear statistical models. McGraw-Hill/Irwin, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  53. Nishikawa KC, Murray ST, Flanders M (1999) Do arm postures vary with the speed of reaching?. J Neurophysiol 81(5): 2582–2586PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Okadome T, Honda M (1999) Kinematic construction of the trajectory of sequential arm movements. Biol Cybern 80(3): 157–169PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Oldfield RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9(1): 97–113PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Osu R, Uno Y, Koike Y, Kawato M (1997) Possible explanations for trajectory curvature in multijoint arm movements. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 23(3): 890–913PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Osu R, Kamimura N, Iwasaki H, Nakano E, Harris CM, Wada Y, Kawato M (2004) Optimal impedance control for task achievement in the presence of signal-dependant noise. J Neurophysiol 92(2): 1199–1215PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Paine RW, Grossberg S, Van Gemmert AWA (2004) A quantitative evaluation of the AVITEWRITE model of handwriting learning. Hum Mov Sci 23(6): 837–860PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Papaxanthis C, Pozzo T, Popov KE, McIntyre J (1998) Hand trajectories of vertical arm movements in one-G and zero-G environments. Evidence for a central representation of gravitational force. Exp Brain Res 120(4): 496–502PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Pellegrini JJ, Flanders M (1996) Force path curvature and conserved features of muscle activation. Exp Brain Res 110(1): 80–90PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Petreska B, Adriani M, Blanke O, Billard AG (2007) Apraxia: a review. Prog Brain Res 164: 61–83PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sabes PN, Jordan MI (1997) Obstacle avoidance and a perturbation sensitivity model of motor planning. J Neurosci 17(18): 7119–7128PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Sauser E, Billard A (2006) Dynamic updating of distributed neural representations using forward models. Biol Cybern 95(6): 567–588PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Schaal S, Sternad D (2001) Origins and violations of the 2/3 power law in rhythmic three-dimensional arm movements. Exp Brain Res 136(1): 60–72PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Schmidt RA, Zelaznik H, Hawkins B, Frank JS, Quinn JT (1979) Motor-output variability: a theory for the accuracy of rapid motor acts. Psychol Rev 47(5): 415–451PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Scott SH, Sergio LE, Kalaska JF (1997) Reaching movements with similar hand paths but different arm orientations. II. Activity of individual cells in dorsal premotor cortex and parietal area 5. J Neurophysiol 78(5): 2413–2426PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Sha D, Patton J, Mussa-Ivaldi FA (2006) Minimum jerk reaching movements of human arm with mechanical constraints at endpoint. Int J Comput Syst Signal 7(1): 41–50Google Scholar
  68. Shadmehr R, Brashers-Krug T (1997) Functional stages in the formation of human long-term motor memory. J Neurosci 17(1): 409–419PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Shadmehr R, Mussa-Ivaldi FA (1994) Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task. J Neurosci 14(5 Pt 2): 3208–3224PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Soechting JF, Lacquaniti F (1981) Invariant characteristics of a pointing movement in man. J Neurosci 1(7): 710–720PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Soechting JF, Buneo CA, Herrmann U, Flandres M (1995) Moving effortlessly in three dimensions: does Donders’ law apply to arm movement?. J Neurosci 15(9): 6271–6280PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. St-Amant Y, Rancourt D, Clancy EA (1998) Influence of smoothing window length on electromyogram amplitude estimates. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 45(6): 795–800PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Sutton GG, Sykes K (1967) The variation of hand tremor with force in healthy subjects. J Physiol 191(3): 699–711PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Thoroughman KA, Shadmehr R (2000) Learning of action through adaptive combination of motor primitives. Nature 407(6805): 742–747PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Todorov E (2004) Optimality principles in sensorimotor control. Nat Neurosci 7(9): 907–915PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Todorov E, Jordan MI (2002) Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination. Nat Neurosci 5(11): 1226–1235PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Torres EB, Zipser D (2002) Reaching to grasp with a multi-joined arm. I. Computational model. J Neurophysiol 88(5): 2355–2367PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Uno Y, Kawato M, Suzuki R (1989) Formation and control of optimal trajectory in human multijoint arm movement. Minimum torque-change model. Biol Cybern 61(2): 89–101PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Vetter P, Flash T, Wolpert DM (2002) Planning movements in a simple redundant task. Curr Biol 12(6): 488–491PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Wada Y, Kaneko Y, Nakano E, Osu R, Kawato M (2001) Quantitative examinations for multi joint arm trajectory planning—using a robust calculation algorithm of the minimum commanded torque change trajectory. Neural Netw 14(4–5): 381–393PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Wang W, Chan SS, Heldman DA, Moran DW (2007) Motor cortical representation of position and velocity during reaching. J Neurophysiol 97(6): 4258–4270PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Wolpert DM, Ghahramani Z, Jordan MI (1994) Perceptual distortion contributes to the curvature of human reaching movements. Exp Brain Res 98(1): 153–156PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Wolpert DM, Ghahramani Z, Jordan MI (1995) Are arm trajectories planned in kinematic or dynamic coordinates? An adaptation study. Exp Brain Res 103(3): 460–470PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Learning Algorithms and Systems LaboratoryEcole Polytechnique Fédérale de LausanneLausanneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations