A neurally plausible model of the dynamics of motion integration in smooth eye pursuit based on recursive Bayesian estimation
In this study, we describe a model of motion integration in smooth eye pursuit based on a recursive Bayesian estimation process, which displays a dynamic behaviour qualitatively similar to the dynamics of the motion integration process observed experimentally, both psychophysically in humans and monkeys, and physiologically in monkeys. By formulating the model as an approximate version of a Kalman filter algorithm, we have been able to show that it can be put into a neurally plausible, distributed recurrent form which coarsely corresponds to the recurrent circuitry of visual cortical areas V1 and MT. The model thus provides further support for the notion that the motion integration process is based on a form of Bayesian estimation, as has been suggested by many psychophysical studies, and moreover suggests that the observed dynamic properties of this process are the result of the recursive nature of the motion estimation.
KeywordsVisual perception Motion integration Smooth eye pursuit Bayesian estimation
- Heeger DJ, Simoncelli EP (1993) Model of visual motion sensing. In: Harris L, Jenkin M (eds) Spatial vision in humans and robots. Cambridge University Press, pp 367–92Google Scholar
- Kalman RE (1960) A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems. Trans ASME J Basic Eng 82: 35–45Google Scholar
- Movshon JA, Adelson EH, Gizzi MS, Newsome WT (1985) The analysis of moving visual patterns. Pattern recognition mechanisms. In: Chagas C, Gattass R, Gross C (eds) Pontificiae Academiae Scientiarum Scripta Varia, vol 54, pp 117–151. Vatican Press, Rome (Reprinted in Exp Brain Res, Supplementum 11: 117–151, 1986)Google Scholar
- Simoncelli EP (2003) Local analysis of visual motion. In: Chalupa LM, Werner JS (eds) The visual neurosciences. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 1616–1623Google Scholar
- Simoncelli E, Adelson E, Heeger D (1991) Probability distributions of optical flow. In: Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision Pattern Recoginition, IEEE, Washington DC, pp 310–15Google Scholar