Object localization in cluttered acoustical environments
- First Online:
- 85 Downloads
In nature, sounds from objects of interest arrive at the ears accompanied by sound waves from other actively emitting objects and by reflections off of nearby surfaces. Despite the fact that all of these waveforms sum at the eardrums, humans with normal hearing effortlessly segregate one sound source from another. Our laboratory is investigating the neural basis of this perceptual feat, often called the “cocktail party effect” using the barn owl as an animal model. The barn owl, renowned for its ability to localize sounds and its spatiotopic representation of auditory space, is an established model for spatial hearing. Here, we briefly review the neural basis of sound-localization of a single sound source in an anechoic environment and then generalize the ideas developed therein to cases in which there are multiple, concomitant sound sources and acoustical reflection.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Blauert J (1997) Spatial hearing. The psychophysics of human sound localization. MIT, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Clifton RK, Freyman RL (1997) The precedence effect: beyond echo suppression. In: Gilkey RH, Anderson TR (eds) Binaural and spatial hearing in real and virtual environments. Erlbaum, MahwahGoogle Scholar
- duLac S, Knudsen EI (1990) Neural maps of head movement vector and speed in the optic tectum of the barn owl. J Neurophysiol 63: 131–46Google Scholar
- Euston DR, Takahashi TT (2002) From spectrum to space: the contribution of level difference cues to spatial receptive fields in the barn owl inferior colliculus. J Neurosci 22: 264–93Google Scholar
- Haas H (1951) Über den einfluss einesEinfachechos auf die Hörsamkeit von Sprache. Acustica 1:49–8Google Scholar
- Konishi M (1973b) How the owl tracks its prey. Am Sci 61: 414–24Google Scholar
- Smedstad HB (2003) Effects of degraded sound-localization cues on neuronal spatial resolution. Biology. University of Oregon, Eugene, p 54Google Scholar