Biological Cybernetics

, Volume 96, Issue 6, pp 547–560 | Cite as

Neuronal selectivity, population sparseness, and ergodicity in the inferior temporal visual cortex

  • Leonardo Franco
  • Edmund T. Rolls
  • Nikolaos C. Aggelopoulos
  • Jose M. Jerez
Original Paper


The sparseness of the encoding of stimuli by single neurons and by populations of neurons is fundamental to understanding the efficiency and capacity of representations in the brain, and was addressed as follows. The selectivity and sparseness of firing to visual stimuli of single neurons in the primate inferior temporal visual cortex were measured to a set of 20 visual stimuli including objects and faces in macaques performing a visual fixation task. Neurons were analysed with significantly different responses to the stimuli. The firing rate distribution of 36% of the neurons was exponential. Twenty-nine percent of the neurons had too few low rates to be fitted by an exponential distribution, and were fitted by a gamma distribution. Interestingly, the raw firing rate distribution taken across all neurons fitted an exponential distribution very closely. The sparseness as or selectivity of the representation of the set of 20 stimuli provided by each of these neurons (which takes a maximal value of 1.0) had an average across all neurons of 0.77, indicating a rather distributed representation. The sparseness of the representation of a given stimulus by the whole population of neurons, the population sparseness ap, also had an average value of 0.77. The similarity of the average single neuron selectivity as and population sparseness for any one stimulus taken at any one time ap shows that the representation is weakly ergodic. For this to occur, the different neurons must have uncorrelated tuning profiles to the set of stimuli.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aggelopoulos NC, Franco L, Rolls ET (2005) Object perception in natural scenes: encoding by inferior temporal cortex simultaneously recorded neurons. J Neurophysiol 93:1342–1357CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Atick JJ (1992) Could information theory provide an ecological theory of sensory processing?. Nature 3:213–251Google Scholar
  3. Baddeley RJ, Abbott LF, Booth MJA, Sengpiel F, Freeman T, Wakeman EA, Rolls ET (1997) Responses of neurons in primary and inferior temporal visual cortices to natural scenes. Proc R Soc Lond B 264:1775–1783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barlow HB (1961) Possible principles underlying the transformation of sensory messages. In: Rosenblith W (ed) MIT Press, Sensory Communication. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  5. Barlow HB, Kaushal TP, Mitchison GJ (1989) Finding minimum entropy codes. Neural Comput 1:412–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Booth MCA, Rolls ET (1998) View-invariant representations of familiar objects by neurons in the inferior temporal visual cortex. Cereb Cortex 8:510–523CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Desimone R (1991) Face-selective cells in the temporal cortex of monkeys. J Cogn Neurosci 3:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Feigenbaum JD, Rolls ET (1991) Allocentric and egocentric spatial information processing in the hippocampal formation of the behaving primate. Psychobiology 19:21–40Google Scholar
  9. Field DJ (1994) What is the goal of sensory coding?. Neural Comput 6:559–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Field DJ (1999) Wavelets, vision, and the statistics of natural scenes. Philos Trans R Soc Lond A 357:2527–2542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Foldiak P (2003) Sparse coding in the primate cortex. In: Arbib MA (ed) The handbook of brain theory and neural networks. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 1064–1068Google Scholar
  12. Franco L, Rolls ET, Aggelopoulos NC, Treves A (2004) The use of decoding to analyze the contribution to the information of the correlations between the firing of simultaneously recorded neurons. Exp Brain Res 155:370–384CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Hopfield JJ (1982) Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 79:2554–2558CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Judge SJ, Richmond BJ, Chu FC (1980) Implantation of magnetic search coils for measurement of eye position: An improved method. Vis Res 20:535–538CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Lehky SR, Sejnowski TJ, Desimone R (2005) Selectivity and sparseness in the responses of striate complex cells. Vis Res 45:57–73CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Levy WB, Baxter RA (1996) Energy efficient neural codes. Neural Comput 8:531–543CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Masuda N, Aihara K (2003) Ergodicity of spike trains: when does trial averaging make sense? Neural Comput 15:1341–1372CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Olshausen BA, Field DJ (1997) Sparse coding with an overcomplete basis set: a strategy employed by V1. Vis Res 37:3311–3325CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Olshausen BA, Field DJ (2004) Sparse coding of sensory inputs. Curr Opin Neurobiol 14:481–487CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Panzeri S, Treves A (1996) Analytical estimates of limited sampling biases in different information measures. Network 7:87–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Perrett DI, Rolls ET, Caan W (1982) Visual neurons responsive to faces in the monkey temporal cortex. Exp Brain Res 47:329–342CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Rolls ET (1984) Neurons in the cortex of the temporal lobe and in the amygdala of the monkey with responses selective for faces. Human Neurobiol 3:209–222Google Scholar
  23. Rolls ET (2000) Functions of the primate temporal lobe cortical visual areas in invariant visual object and face recognition. Neuron 27:205–218CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Rolls ET (2005) Emotion Explained. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rolls ET (2007) The representation of information about faces in the temporal and frontal lobes. Neuropsychologia 45:125–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rolls ET (2008) Memory, attention, and decision-making: a unifying computational neuroscience approach. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  27. Rolls ET, Tovee MJ (1995) Sparseness of the neuronal representation of stimuli in the primate temporal visual cortex. J Neurophysiol 73:713–726PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Rolls ET, Deco G (2002) Computational neuroscience of vision. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  29. Rolls ET, Treves A (1998) Neural networks and brain function. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  30. Rolls ET, Treves A (1990) The relative advantages of sparse versus distributed encoding for associative neuronal networks in the brain. Network 1:407–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rolls ET, Sanghera MK, Roper-Hall A (1979) The latency of activation of neurons in the lateral hypthalamus and substantia innominata during feeding in the monkey. Brain Res 164:121–135CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Rolls ET, Treves A, Tovee MJ (1997a) The representational capacity of the distributed encoding of information provided by populations of neurons in the primate temporal visual cortex. Exp Brain Res 114:177–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rolls ET, Treves A, Tovee MJ, Panzeri S (1997b) Information in the neuronal representation of individual stimuli in the primate temporal visual cortex. J Comput Neurosci 4:309–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rolls ET, Franco L, Aggelopoulos NC, Reece S (2003) An information theoretic approach to the contributions of the firing rates and correlations between the firing of neurons. J Neurophysiol 89:2810–2822CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Rolls ET, Aggelopoulos NC, Franco L, Treves A (2004) Information encoding in the inferior temporal cortex: contributions of the firing rates and correlations between the firing of neurons. Biol Cybern 90:19–32CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Rolls ET, Franco L, Aggelopoulos NC, Perez JM (2006) Information in the first spike, the order of spikes, and the number of spikes provided by neurons in the inferior temporal visual cortex. Vis Res 46:4193–4205CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Tanaka K (1996) Inferotemporal cortex and object vision. Annu Rev Neurosci 19:109–139CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Tovee MJ, Rolls ET (1995) Information encoding in short firing rate epochs by single neurons in the primate temporal visual cortex. Vis Cogn 2:35–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tovee MJ, Rolls ET, Azzopardi P (1994) Translation invariance in the responses to faces of single neurons in the temporal visual cortical areas of the alert macaque. J Neurophysiol 72:1049–1060PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Tovee MJ, Rolls ET, Treves A, Bellis RP (1993) Information encoding and the responses of single neurons in the primate temporal visual cortex. J Neurophysiol 70:640–654PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Treves A (1990) Graded-response neurons and information encodings in autoassociative memories. Physical Review A 42:2418–2430CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Treves A, Rolls ET (1991) What determines the capacity of autoassociative memories in the brain? Network 2:371–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Treves A, Panzeri S (1995) The upward bias in measures of information derived from limited data samples. Neural Comput 7:399–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Treves A, Panzeri S, Rolls ET, Booth M, Wakeman EA (1999) Firing rate distributions and efficiency of information transmission of inferior temporal cortex neurons to natural visual stimuli. Neural Comput 11:611–641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Vinje WE, Gallant JL (2000) Sparse coding and decorrelation in primary visual cortex during natural vision. Science 287:1273–1276CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Vinje WE, Gallant JL (2002) Natural stimulation of the nonclassical receptive field increases information transmission efficiency in V1. J Neurosci 22:2904–2915PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Vogels R (1999) Categorization of complex visual images by rhesus monkeys. Part 2: single-cell study. Eur J Neurosci 11:1239–1255CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Willmore B, Tolhurst DJ (2001) Characterizing the sparseness of neural codes. Network 12:255–270PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Young MP, Yamane S (1992) Sparse population coding of faces in the inferotemporal cortex. Science 256:1327–1331CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leonardo Franco
    • 1
  • Edmund T. Rolls
    • 2
  • Nikolaos C. Aggelopoulos
    • 2
  • Jose M. Jerez
    • 1
  1. 1.Depto. de Lenguajes y Cs. de la ComputacionUniversidad de MalagaMalagaSpain
  2. 2.Department of Experimental PsychologyUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations