Biological Cybernetics

, Volume 96, Issue 5, pp 519–531 | Cite as

Depth, contrast and view-based homing in outdoor scenes

  • Wolfgang StürzlEmail author
  • Jochen Zeil
Original Paper


Panoramic image differences can be used for view-based homing under natural outdoor conditions, because they increase smoothly with distance from a reference location (Zeil et al., J Opt Soc Am A 20(3):450–469, 2003). The particular shape, slope and depth of such image difference functions (IDFs) recorded at any one place, however, depend on a number of factors that so far have only been qualitatively identified. Here we show how the shape of difference functions depends on the depth structure and the contrast of natural scenes, by quantifying the depth- distribution of different outdoor scenes and by comparing it to the difference functions calculated with differently processed panoramic images, which were recorded at the same locations. We find (1) that IDFs and catchment areas become systematically wider as the average distance of objects increases, (2) that simple image processing operations—like subtracting the local mean, difference-of-Gaussian filtering and local contrast normalization—make difference functions robust against changes in illumination and the spurious effects of shadows, and (3) by comparing depth-dependent translational and depth-independent rotational difference functions, we show that IDFs of contrast-normalized snapshots are predominantly determined by the depth-structure and possibly also by occluding contours in a scene. We propose a model for the shape of IDFs as a tool for quantitative comparisons between the shapes of these functions in different scenes.


Image Difference Natural Scene Local Contrast Motion Parallax Horizontal Slice 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Baddeley R (1997) The correlational structure of natural images and the calibration of spatial representations. Cogn Sci 21:351–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brünnert U, Kelber A, Zeil J (1994) Ground-nesting bees determine the distance of their nest from a landmark by other than angular size cues. J Comp Physiol A 175:363–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carandini M, Heeger D, Movshon J (1997) Linearity and normalization in simple cells of the macaque primary visual cortex. J Neurosci 17:8621–8644PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Cartwright B, Collett T (1983) Landmark learning in bees: experiments and models. J Comp Physiol 15:521–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cartwright B, Collett T (1987) Landmark maps for honeybees. Biol Cybern 57:85–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chahl J, Srinivasan M (1997) Reflective surfaces for panoramic imaging. Appl Optics 36:8275–8285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Collett T (1995) Making learning easy: the acquisition of visual information during the orientation flights of social wasps. J Comp Physiol A 177:737–747Google Scholar
  8. Collett T, Lehrer M (1993) Looking and learning: a spatial pattern in the orientation flight of the wasp Vespula vulgaris. Proc R Soc Lond B 252:129–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Collett T, Zeil J (1997a) Flights of learning. Curr Dir Psych Sci 5: 149–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Collett T, Zeil J (1997b) Selection and use of landmarks by insects. In: Lehrer M (ed) Orientation and communication in arthropods. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, pp 41–65Google Scholar
  11. Collett T, Zeil J (1998) Places and landmarks: an arthropod perspective. In: Healy S (ed) Spatial representation in animals. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 18–53Google Scholar
  12. Fleet D, Heeger D, Wagner H (1996) Modeling binocular neurons in primary visual cortex. In: Jenkin M, Harris L (eds) Computational and biological mechanisms of visual coding. Cambridge University Press, London, pp 103–130Google Scholar
  13. Franz M, Mallot H (2000) Biomimetic robot navigation. Rob Auton Syst 30:133–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Franz M, Schölkopf B, Mallot H, Bülthoff H (1998) Where did I take that snapshot? Scene based homing by image matching. Biol Cybern 79:191–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gaussier P, Joulain C, Banquet J, Leprêtre S, Revel A (2000) The visual homing problem: an example of robotics/biology cross fertilization. Rob Auton Syst 30:155–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Giurfa M, Capaldi E (1999) Vectors, routes and maps: new discoveries about navigation in insects. Trends Neurosci 22:237–242PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. van Hateren H (1992) Theoretical predictions of spatiotemporal receptive fields of fly LMCs. J Comp Physiol A 171:157–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. van Hateren H (1993) Three modes of spatiotemporal processing by eyes. J Comp Physiol A 172:583–591PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Junger W (1991) Waterstriders (Gerris paludum F.) compensate for drift with a discontinuously working visual position servo. J Comp Physiol A 169:633–639Google Scholar
  20. Lehrer M (1993) Why do bees turn back and look?. J Comp Physiol A 172:549–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lehrer M, Collett T (1994) Approaching and departing bees learn different cues to the distance of a landmark. J Comp Physiol A 175: 171–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Möller R (2002) Insects could exploit UV-green contrast for landmark navigation. J Theor Biol 214:619–663PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nicholson D, Judd S, Cartwritght B, Collett T (1999) Learning walks and landmark guidance in wood ants (Formica rufa). J Exp Biol 202:1831–1838PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Osorio D, Vorobyev M (2005) Photoreceptor spectral sensitivities in terrestrial animals: adaptations for luminance and colour vision. Proc R Soc B 272:1745–1752PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Srinivasan M, Laughlin S, Dubs A (1982) Predictive coding: a fresh view of inhibition in the retina. Proc R Soc Lond B 216:427–459PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Szenher M (2005) Visual homing in natural environments. In: Nehmzow U, Melhuish C, Witkowski M (eds) Towards autonomous robotic systems (TAROS-05), p 221Google Scholar
  27. Vardy A, Möller R (2005) Biologically plausible visual homing methods based on optical flow techniques. Connect Sci 17:47–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Vladusich T, Hemmi J, Srinivasan M, Zeil J (2005) Interactions of visual odometry and landmark guidance during food search in honeybees. J Exp Biol 208:4123–4135PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Voss R, Zeil J (1998) Active vision in insects: an analysis of object-directed zig-zag flights in a ground-nesting wasp (Odynerus spinipes, Eumenidae). J Comp Physiol A 182:377–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Zanker J, Zeil J (2005) Movement-induced motion signal distributions in outdoor scenes. Netw Comp Neural Syst 16:357–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zeil J (1993a) Orientation flights of solitary wasps (Cerceris; Sphecidae; Hymenoptera): I. Description of flight. J Comp Physiol A 172:189–205Google Scholar
  32. Zeil J (1993b) Orientation flights of solitary wasps (Cerceris; Sphecidae; Hymenoptera): II. Similarities between orientation and return flights and the use of motion parallax. J Comp Physiol A 172: 207–222Google Scholar
  33. Zeil J, Wittmann D (1993) Landmark orientation during the approach to the nest in the stingless bee Trigona (Tetragonisca) angustula (Apidae, Meliponinae). Insectes Sociaux 40:381–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zeil J, Kelber A, Voss R (1996) Structure and function of learning flights in bees and wasps. J Exp Biol 199:245–252PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Zeil J, Hofmann M, Chahl J (2003) Catchment areas of panoramic snapshots in outdoor scenes. J Opt Soc Am A 20(3):450–469Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ARC Centre of Excellence in Vision Science and Centre for Visual Sciences, Research School of Biological SciencesThe Australian National UniversityCanberraAustralia
  2. 2.Robotics and Embedded Systems, Computer Science DepartmentTechnical University MunichGarchingGermany

Personalised recommendations