Bayesian processing of vestibular information
- 283 Downloads
Complex self-motion stimulations in the dark can be powerfully disorienting and can create illusory motion percepts. In the absence of visual cues, the brain has to use angular and linear acceleration information provided by the vestibular canals and the otoliths, respectively. However, these sensors are inaccurate and ambiguous. We propose that the brain processes these signals in a statistically optimal fashion, reproducing the rules of Bayesian inference. We also suggest that this processing is related to the statistics of natural head movements. This would create a perceptual bias in favour of low velocity and acceleration. We have constructed a Bayesian model of self-motion perception based on these assumptions. Using this model, we have simulated perceptual responses to centrifugation and off-vertical axis rotation and obtained close agreement with experimental findings. This demonstrates how Bayesian inference allows to make a quantitative link between sensor noise and ambiguities, statistics of head movement, and the perception of self-motion.
KeywordsMotion Estimate Rotation Velocity Linear Acceleration Motion Perception Head Orientation
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Curthoys IS, Haslwanter T, Black RA, Burgess AM, Halmagyi GM, Topple AN, Todd MJ (1998) Off-center yaw rotation: effect of naso-occipital linear acceleration on the nystagmus response of normal human subjects and patients after unilateral vestibular loss. Exp Brain Res 123(4):425–438PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Droulez J, Darlot C (1989) The geometric and dynamic implications of the coherence constraints in three-dimensional sensorimotor interactions. In: Jeannerod M. (ed) Attention and Performance XIII. New York, Erlbaum, pp 495–526Google Scholar
- Droulez J, Cornilleau Perez V (1993) Application of the coherence scheme to the multisensory fusion problem. In: Jeannerod M (ed) Multisensory control of movement. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 485–501Google Scholar
- Glasauer S, Merfeld DM (1997) Modeling three dimensional vestibular responses during complex motion stimulations. In: Three-dimensional kinematics of eye, head and limb movements, Harwood Switzerland, pp 387–389Google Scholar
- Glasauer S (1992) Human spatial orientation during centrifuge experiments : non-linear interaction of semicircular canals and otoliths. In: Jerabek J Krejcova H (ed) Proceedings of the XVIIth Barany Society Meeting, pp 48–52Google Scholar
- Graybiel A and Clark B (1965) Validity of the oculogravic illusion as an indicator of otolith function. Aerospace Med 36: 1173–1181Google Scholar
- Guedry FE (1974) Psychophysics of vestibular sensation. In: Kornhuber H.H (ed) Handbook of sensory physiology, Chap. 1. Springer, Berlin, pp 3–154Google Scholar
- Hosman RJ, van der Vaart JC (1978) Vestibular models and thresehomds of motion perception. results of tests in a flight simulator. ReportGoogle Scholar
- Mayne R (1974) A system concept of the vestibular organs. In: Kornhuber H.H (ed) Handbook of Sensory Physiology, vol VI. Vestibular system Part 2: psychophysics, applied aspects and general interpretations. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 493–580Google Scholar
- Raphan T, Cohen B, Matsuo V (1977) A velocity-storage mechanism responsible for optokinetic nystagmus (okn), optokinetic after-nystagmus (okan) and vestibular nystagmus. In: Control of gaze by brainsteam neurons, Elsevier, Amsterdam pp 37–47Google Scholar
- Robinson DA (1977) Vestibular and optokinetic symbiosis: an example of explaining by modelling. In: Control of gaze by brainsteam neurons, Elsevier, Amsterdam pp 49–58Google Scholar