Response linearity determined by recruitment strategy in detailed model of nictitating membrane control
Many models of eyeblink conditioning assume that there is a simple linear relationship between the firing patterns of neurons in the interpositus nucleus and the time course of the conditioned response (CR). However, the complexities of muscle behaviour and plant dynamics call this assumption into question. We investigated the issue by implementing the most detailed model available of the rabbit nictitating membrane response (Bartha and Thompson in Biol Cybern 68:135–143, 1992a and in Biol Cybern 68:145–154, 1992b), in which each motor unit of the retractor bulbi muscle is represented by a Hill-type model, driven by a non-linear activation mechanism designed to reproduce the isometric force measurements of Lennerstrand (J Physiol 236:43–55, 1974). Globe retraction and NM extension are modelled as linked second order systems. We derived versions of the model that used a consistent set of SI units, were based on a physically realisable version of calcium kinetics, and used simulated muscle cross-bridges to produce force. All versions showed similar non-linear responses to two basic control strategies. (1) Rate-coding with no recruitment gave a sigmoidal relation between control signal and amplitude of CR, reflecting the measured relation between isometric muscle force and stimulation frequency. (2) Recruitment of similar strength motor units with no rate coding gave a sublinear relation between control signal and amplitude of CR, reflecting the increase in muscle stiffness produced by recruitment. However, the system response could be linearised by either a suitable combination of rate-coding and recruitment, or by simple recruitment of motor units in order of (exponentially) increasing strength. These plausible control strategies, either alone or in combination, would in effect present the cerebellum with the simplified virtual plant that is assumed in many models of eyeblink conditioning. Future work is therefore needed to determine the extent to which motor neuron firing is in fact linearly related to the nictitating membrane response.
Nictitating membrane response
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Cooper S, Eccles JC (1930) The isometric responses of mammalian muscles. J Physiol 69:375–385Google Scholar
- Disterhoft JF, Weiss C (1985) Motoneuronal control of eye retraction/nictitating membrane extension in rabbit. In: Alkon DL, Woody CD (eds) Neural mechanisms of conditioning, Plenum Press, New York, 197–208Google Scholar
- Eglitis I (1964) The glands. In: Prince JH (ed) The rabbit in eye research, Charles C Thomas, Springfield, Il, pp 38–56Google Scholar
- Evinger C, Manning KA, Sibony PA (1991) Eyelid movements. Mechanisms and normal data. Invest Ophthalmol Visual Sci 32:387–400Google Scholar
- Goldberg SJ (1990) Mechanical properties of extraocular motor units. In: Binder MD, Mendell LM (eds) The segmental motor system. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 222–238Google Scholar
- Hesslow G, Yeo CH (2002) The functional anatomy of skeletal conditioning. In: Moore JW (ed) A neuroscientist’s guide to classical conditioning. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 86–146Google Scholar
- Huxley AF (1957) Muscle structure and theories of contraction. Prog Biophys Biophys Chem 7:257–318Google Scholar
- Lepora NF, Mavritsaki E, Porrill J, Dean P, Yeo CH, Evinger LC (2005) Evidence for linearity in control of nictitating membrane responses by retractor bulbi motor units. In: 2005 Abstract Viewer/Itinerary Planner. Society for Neuroscience, Washington, Prog. No. 869.863Google Scholar
- Mavritsaki E, Porrill J, Ivarsson M, Yeo CH, Dean P (2001) Recruitment of retractor bulbi motor units in a population model of the nictitating membrane response. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts 27:Prog. no. 405.404Google Scholar
- Prince JH (1964) The rabbit in eye research. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IlGoogle Scholar
- Sanchez-Campusano R, Delgado-García JM, Gruart A (2003) A phenomenological model for the neuromuscular control of reflex and learned eyelid responses. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts Program No:78.72Google Scholar
- Shames DM, Baker AJ, Weiner MW, Camacho SA (1996) Ca2+-force relationship of frog skeletal muscle: a dynamics model for parameter estimation. Am J Physiol 271 (Cell Physiol 40):C2061–C2071Google Scholar