Advertisement

Biological Cybernetics

, Volume 95, Issue 4, pp 349–369 | Cite as

Linear and nonlinear causality between signals: methods, examples and neurophysiological applications

  • Boris GourévitchEmail author
  • Régine Le Bouquin-Jeannès
  • Gérard Faucon
Original Paper

Abstract

In this paper, we will present and review the most usual methods to detect linear and nonlinear causality between signals: linear Granger causality test (Geweke in J Am Stat Assoc 77:304–313, 1982) extended to direct causality in multivariate case (LGC), directed coherence (DCOH, Saito and Harashima in Recent advances in EEG and EMG data processing, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1981), partial directed coherence (PDC, Sameshima and Baccala 1999) and nonlinear Granger causality test of Baek and Brock (in Working Paper University of Iowa, 1992) extended to direct causality in multivariate case (partial nonlinear Granger causality, PNGC). All these methods are tested and compared on several ARX, Poisson and nonlinear models, and on neurophysiological data (depth EEG). The results show that LGC, DCOH and PDC are not very robust in relation to nonlinear linkages but they seem to correctly find linear linkages if only the autoregressive parts are nonlinear. PNGC is extremely dependent on the choice of parameters. Moreover, LGC and PNGC may give misleading results in the case of causality on a spectral band, which is illustrated by our neurophysiological database.

Keywords

Adjacency Matrix Granger Causality Planum Temporale Neurosci Method Directed Transfer Function 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Supplementary material

422_2006_98_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (83 kb)
Supplementary material

References

  1. Ashley R, Granger CWJ, Schmalensee R (1980) Advertising and aggregate consumption: an analysis of causality. Econometrica 48:1149–1168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Babloyantz A, Destexhe A (1986) Low-dimensional chaos in an instance of epilepsy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83(10):3513–3517PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baccala LA, Sameshima K (2001) Partial directed coherence: a new concept in neural structure determination. Biol Cybern 84(6):463–474PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baek E, Brock W (1992) A general test for nonlinear Granger causality. Working Paper University of IowaGoogle Scholar
  5. Bernasconi C, Konig P (1999) On the directionality of cortical interactions studied by structural analysis of electrophysiological recordings. Biol Cybern 81(3):199–210PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bernasconi C, von Stein A, Chiang C, Konig P (2000) Bi-directional interactions between visual areas in the awake behaving cat. Neuroreport 11(4):689–692PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Boudjellaba H, Dufour JM, Roy R (1992) Testing causality between two vectors in multivariate autoregressive moving average models. J Am Stat Assoc 87:1082–1090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brovelli A, Ding M, Ledberg A, Chen Y, Nakamura R, Bressler SL (2004) Beta oscillations in a large-scale sensorimotor cortical network: directional influences revealed by Granger causality. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101(26):9849–9854PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Caines P, Chan C (1975) Feedback between stationary stochastic processes. IEEE Trans Automat Control 20(4):498–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Casdagli MC, Iasemidis LD, Savit RS, Gilmore RL, Roper SN, Sackellares JC (1997) Non-linearity in invasive EEG recordings from patients with temporal lobe epilepsy. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 102(2):98–105PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cassidy M, Brown P (2003) Spectral phase estimates in the setting of multidirectional coupling. J Neurosci Methods 127(1):95–103PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chartrand G (1985) Introductory graph theory. Dover, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Chavez M, Martinerie J, Le Van Quyen M (2003) Statistical assessment of nonlinear causality: application to epileptic EEG signals. J Neurosci Methods 124(2):113–128PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chen Y, Rangarajan G, Feng J, Ding M (2004) Analyzing multiple nonlinear time series with extended Granger causality. Phys Lett A 324(1):26–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chen Y, Bressler SL, Ding M (2006) Frequency decomposition of conditional Granger causality and application to multivariate neural field potential data. J Neurosci Methods 150(2): 228–237PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dahlhaus R, Eichler M (2003) Causality and graphical models for time series. In: Green P, Hjort N, Richardson S (eds) Highly structured stochastic systems. University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  17. De Clercq W, Lemmerling P, Van Huffel S, Van Paesschen W (2003) Anticipation of epileptic seizures from standard EEG recordings. Lancet 361(9361):971; author reply 971Google Scholar
  18. Diks C, Panchenko V (2005) A note on the Hiemstra–Jones test for Granger non-causality. Stud Nonlinear Dynam Econometrics 9(2), art 4:1–7Google Scholar
  19. Diks CG, Degoede J (2001) A general nonparametric bootstrap test for Granger causality. In: Broer HW, Krauskopf W, Vegter G (eds) Global analysis of dynamical systems. Institute of Physics Publishing, BristolGoogle Scholar
  20. Ding M, Bressler SL, Yang W, Liang H (2000) Short-window spectral analysis of cortical event-related potentials by adaptive multivariate autoregressive modeling: data preprocessing, model validation, and variability assessment. Biol Cybern 83(1):35–45PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Elbert T, Ray WJ, Kowalik,ZJ, Skinner JE, Graf KE, Birbaumer N (1994) Chaos and physiology: deterministic chaos in excitable cell assemblies. Physiol Rev 74(1):1–47PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Frank GW, Lookman T, Nerenberg MAH, Essex C, Lemieux J, Blume W (1990) Chaotic time series analysis of epileptic seizures. Physica D 46:427–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Freiwald WA, Valdes P, Bosch J, Biscay R, Jimenez JC, Rodriguez LM, Rodriguez V, Kreiter AK, Singer W (1999) Testing non-linearity and directedness of interactions between neural groups in the macaque inferotemporal cortex. J Neurosci Methods 94(1):105–119PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Geweke J (1982) Measurement of linear dependence and feedback between multiple time series. J Am Stat Assoc 77:304–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Geweke J (1984) Measures of conditional linear dependence and feedback between time series. J Am Stat Assoc 79: 907–915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Geweke J, Meese R, Dent W (1983) Comparing alternative tests of causality in temporal systems: analytic results and experimental evidence. J Econometrics 21:161–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Granger CWJ (1969) Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica 37:424–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Granger CWJ, Newbold P (1977) Forecasting economic time series. Academic, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. Grassberger P (1988) Finite sample correction to entropy and dimension estimates. Phys Lett A 128:369–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Grassberger P, Procaccia I (1983) Measuring the strangeness of strange attractors. Physica D 9:189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Grassberger P, Schreiber T, Schaffrath C (1991) Non-linear time sequence analysis. Int J Bif Chaos 1:521–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Guéguin M, Le Bouquin-Jeannès R, Faucon F, Chauvel P, Liégeois-Chauvel C (2006) Evidence of functional connectivity between auditory cortical areas revealed by amplitude modulation sound processing. Cerebral Cortex doi:10.1093/cercor/bhj148Google Scholar
  33. Hesse W, Moller E, Arnold M, Witte H, Schack B (2002) Brief causal relations in EEG based on adaptive Granger causality. Biomed Tech (Berl) 47(Suppl 1 Pt 2):510–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hesse W, Moller E, Arnold M, Schack B (2003) The use of time-variant EEG Granger causality for inspecting directed interdependencies of neural assemblies. J Neurosci Methods 124(1):27–44PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hiemstra C, Jones J (1994) Testing for linear and nonlinear Granger causality in the stock price-volume relation. J Finance 49:1639–1664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hoekstra BP, Diks CG, Allessie MA, Degoede J (2001) Non-linear time series analysis: methods and applications to atrial fibrillation. Ann Ist Super Sanita 37(3):325–333PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Iasemidis LD, Sackellares JC (1996) Chaos theory and epilepsy. The Neuroscientist. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 118–208Google Scholar
  38. Jing H, Takigawa M (2000) Observation of EEG coherence after repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 111:1620–1631PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jing H, Takigawa M, Okamura H, Doi W, Fukuzako H (2001a) Comparisons of event-related potentials after repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. J Neurol 248(3):184–192PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Jing H, Takigawa M, Hamada K, Okamura H, Kawaika Y, Yonezawa T, Fukuzako H (2001b) Effects of high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on P300 event-related potentials. Clin Neurophysiol 112:304–313PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kaminski M, Blinowska K, Szelenberger W (1995) Investigation of coherence structure and EEG activity propagation during sleep. Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars) 55(3):213–219Google Scholar
  42. Kaminski M, Blinowska K, Szclenberger W (1997) Topographic analysis of coherence and propagation of EEG activity during sleep and wakefulness. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 102(3):216–227PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kaminski M, Ding M, Truccolo W, Bressler SL (2001) Evaluating relations in neural systems: Granger causality, directed transfer function and statistical assessment of significance. Biol Cybern 85:145–157PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kaminski MJ, Blinowska KJ (1991) A new method of the description of the information flow in the brain structures. Biol Cybern 65(3):203–210PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kanzler L (1998) A Study of the efficiency of the foreign exchange market through analysis of ultra-high frequency data. PhD Thesis, University of OxfordGoogle Scholar
  46. Kelly JP (1991) Hearing. Princ Neural SciGoogle Scholar
  47. Korzeniewska A, Kasicki S, Kaminski M, Blinowska KJ (1997) Information flow between hippocampus and related structures during various types of rat’s behavior. J Neurosci Methods 73(1):49–60PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Korzeniewska A, Manczak M, Kaminski M, Blinowska KJ, Kasicki S (2003) Determination of information flow direction among brain structures by a modified directed transfer function (dDTF) method. J Neurosci Methods 125(1-2):195–207PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. LeBaron B (1997) A fast algorithm for the BDS statistic. Stud Nonlinear Dynam Econometrics 2:53–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Liang H, Ding M, Nakamura R, Bressler SL (2000) Causal influences in primate cerebral cortex during visual pattern discrimination. Neuroreport 11(13):2875–2880PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Liégeois-Chauvel C, Lorenzi C, Trebuchon A, Régis J, Chauvel P (2004) Temporal envelope processing in the human left and right auditory cortices. Cereb Cortex 14:731–740PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ljung L (1999) System identification û theory for the user. Prentice Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  53. Lopes da Silva FH, Mars NJI (1987) Parametric methods in EEG analysis. In: Gevins AS, Remond A (eds) Methods of analysis of brain electrical and magnetic signals, EEG handbook, vol 1. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 243–260Google Scholar
  54. Martinerie J, Adam C, Le Van Quyen M, Baulac M, Clemenceau S, Renault B, Varela FJ (1998) Epileptic seizures can be anticipated by non-linear analysis. Nat Med 4(10):1173–1176PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. McSharry PE, Smith LA, Tarassenko L (2003a) Comparison of predictability of epileptic seizures by a linear and a nonlinear method. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 50(5):628–633PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. McSharry PE, Smith LA, Tarassenko L (2003b) Prediction of epileptic seizures: are nonlinear methods relevant? Nat Med 9(3):241–242; author reply 242Google Scholar
  57. Moller E, Schack B, Arnold M, Witte H (2001) Instantaneous multivariate EEG coherence analysis by means of adaptive high-dimensional autoregressive models. J Neurosci Methods 105(2):143–158PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Natarajan K, Acharya UR, Alias F, Tiboleng T, Puthusserypady SK (2004) Nonlinear analysis of EEG signals at different mental states. Biomed Eng Online 3(1):7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Olofsen E (1991) The identification of strange attractors using experimental time series PhD Thesis, Twente University, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  60. Palus M (1996) Nonlinearity in normal human EEG: cycles, temporal asymmetry, nonstationarity and randomness, not chaos. Biol Cybern 75(5):389–396PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Palus M (1999) Nonlinear dynamics in the EEG analysis: disappointments and perspectives. In: Pradhan N, Rapp PE, Sreenivasan R (ed) Nonlinear dynamics and brain functioning. Novascience, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  62. Parzen E (1962) On estimation of a probability density function and mode. Ann Math Stat 33:1065–1076Google Scholar
  63. Picton TW (1987) Human auditory steady state responses. In: Barber C, Blum T (eds) Evoked potentials, vol III. Butterworth, Boston, pp 117–124Google Scholar
  64. Pijn JPM (1990) Quantitative evaluation of EEG signals in epilepsy; nonlinear associations, time delays and nonlinear dynamics. PhD Thesis, University of AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  65. Rosenblatt M (1956) Remarks on some nonparametric estimates of a density function. Ann Math Stat 27(3):832–837Google Scholar
  66. Sabesan S, Narayanan K, Prasad A, Spanias A, Sackellares JC, Iasemidis LD (2003) Predictability of epileptic seizures: a comparative study using Lyapunov exponent and entropy based measures. Biomed Sci Instrum 39:129–135PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Saito Y, Harashima H (1981) Tracking of information within multichannel EEG record. In: Yamaguchi N, Fujisawa K (eds) Recent advances in EEG and EMG data processing. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 133–146Google Scholar
  68. Sameshima K, Baccala LA (1999) Using partial directed coherence to describe neuronal ensemble interactions. J Neurosci Methods 94:93–103PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Schack B, Grieszbach G, Arnold M, Bolten J (1995) Dynamic cross-spectral analysis of biological signals by means of bivariate ARMA processes with time-dependent coefficients. Med Biol Eng Comput 33(4):605–610PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Schelter B, Winterhalder M, Timmer J (2004a) Detection of coupling directions in multivariate oscillatory systems. In: 8th Experimental chaos conferenceGoogle Scholar
  71. Schelter B, Winterhalder M, Timmer J (2004b) Time varying causal influences in multivariate time series. In: Workshop “Recent advances in time series analysis”Google Scholar
  72. Schnider SM, Kwong RH, Lenz FA, Kwan HC (1989) Detection of feedback in the central nervous system using system identification techniques. Biol Cybern 60(3):203–212PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Schreiber T (2000) Measuring information transfer. Phys Rev Lett 85(2):461–464PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Silverman BW (1986) Kernel density estimation techniques for statistics and data analysis. Chapman Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  75. Sims CA (1972) Money, income, and causality. Am Econ Rev 62(4):540–553Google Scholar
  76. Supp GG, Schlgl A, Gunter TC, Bernard M, Pfurtscheller G, Petsche H (2004) Lexical memory search during N400: cortical couplings in auditory comprehension. Neuroreport 15(7):1209–1213PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Takigawa M (1988) Rhythmic light therapy for depression and data processing analysis of its effects by directed coherence. Act Nerv Super (Praha) 30(3):177–180Google Scholar
  78. Takigawa M, Wang H, Kawasaki H, Fukuzako H (1996) EEG analysis of epilepsy by directed coherence method. A data processing approach. Int J Psychophysiol 21(2/3):65–73Google Scholar
  79. Takigawa M, Wang H, Hamada K, Shiratani T, Takenouchi K (2000) Directed coherence of EEG on ICSS rats with methamphetamine-induced hyperactivity and stereotyped behavior. Ann N Y Acad Sci 914:311–315PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Theiler J (1986) Spurious dimension from correlation algorithms applied to limited time-series data. Phys Rev A 34(3):2427–2432PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Theiler J, Rapp PE (1996) Re-examination of the evidence for low-dimensional, nonlinear structure in the human electroencephalogram. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 98(3):213–222PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Theiler J, Eubank S, Longtin A, Galdrikian B, Farmer JD (1992) Testing for nonlinearity in time series: the method of surrogate data. Physica D 58:77–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Triacca U (2004) Feedback, causality and distance between arma models. Math Comput Simulat 64:679–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Wang G, Takigawa M (1992) Directed coherence as a measure of interhemispheric correlation of EEG. Int J Psychophysiol 13(2):119–128PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Wang G, Yunokuchi K (2002) Causality of frontal and occipital alpha activity revealed by directed coherence. IEICE Trans Inf Syst E85-D:1334–1340Google Scholar
  86. Wang G, Takigawa M, Matsushita T (1992) Correlation of alpha activity between the frontal and occipital cortex. Jpn J Physiol 42(1):1–13PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Wiener N, (1956) The theory of prediction. In: Beckenbach EF, editors. Modern Mathematics for Engineers. New York, McGraw-HillGoogle Scholar
  88. Winterhalder M, Schelter B, Maiwald T, Aschenbrenner- Scheibe R, Brandt A, Schulze-Bonhage A, Timmer J (2004) Nonlinear dynamics in EEG from epileptic patients: Is it possible to predict seizures?. In: Boccaletti S, Gluckman BJ, Kurths J et al (eds) Experimental chaos, vol AIP Conference Proceedings 742. AIP Press, FlorenceGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Boris Gourévitch
    • 1
    Email author
  • Régine Le Bouquin-Jeannès
    • 1
  • Gérard Faucon
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratoire Traitement du Signal et de l’ImageInserm U642, Université de Rennes 1Rennes CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations