Abstract
Riding uphill presents a challenge to competitive and recreational cyclists. Based on only limited evidence, some scientists have reported that tilting the saddle nose down improves uphill-cycling efficiency by as much as 6%. Purpose: here, we investigated if simply tilting the saddle nose down increases efficiency during uphill cycling, which would presumably improve performance. Methods: nineteen healthy, recreational cyclists performed multiple 5 min trials of seated cycling at ~ 3 W kg–1 on a large, custom-built treadmill inclined to 8° under two saddle-tilt angle conditions: parallel to the riding surface and 8° nose down. We measured subjects’ rates of oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide production using an expired-gas analysis system and then calculated their average metabolic power during the last two min of each 5 min trial. Results: we found that, compared to the parallel-saddle condition, tilting the saddle nose down by 8° improved gross efficiency from 0.205 to 0.208—an average increase of 1.4% ± 0.2%, t = 5.9, p < 0.001, CI95% [0.9 to 1.9], dz = 1.3. Conclusion: our findings are relevant to competitive and recreational cyclists and present an opportunity for innovating new devices and saddle designs that enhance uphill-cycling efficiency. The effect of saddle tilt on other slopes and the mechanism behind the efficiency improvement remain to be investigated.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- d z :
-
Cohen’s dz effect size
- f :
-
Frequency of breathing
- GE:
-
Gross efficiency
- RER:
-
Respiratory exchange ratio
- SEM:
-
Standard error of the mean
- UCI:
-
Union Cycliste Internationale
- \({\dot{\text{V}}\text{O}}_{{2}}\) :
-
Mean rate of oxygen uptake
- \({\dot{\text{V}}}_{{\text{E}}}\) :
-
Mean rate of pulmonary ventilation
- \({\overline{\text{V}}}_{{\text{T}}}\) :
-
Mean expired tidal volume
References
Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A-G, Buchner A (2007) G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 39:175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
Fonda B, Panjan A, Markovic G, Sarabon N (2011) Adjusted saddle position counteracts the modified muscle activation patterns during uphill cycling. J Electromyogr Kines 21:854–860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2011.05.010
Fonda B, Šarabon N (2012) Biomechanics and energetics of uphill cycling: A review. Kinesiology 44:5–17. https://core.ac.uk/reader/52485950
Gaesser GA, Brooks GA (1975) Muscular efficiency during steady-rate exercise: effects of speed and work rate. J Appl Physiol 38:1132–1139. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1975.38.6.1132
Gnehm P, Reichenbach S (1997) Influence of different racing positions on metabolic cost in elite cyclists. Med Sci Sports Exerc 29:818–823
Hintze JL, Nelson RD (1998) Violin plots: a box plot-density trace synergism. Am Stat 52:181. https://doi.org/10.2307/2685478
Kipp S, Byrnes WC, Kram R (2018) Calculating metabolic energy expenditure across a wide range of exercise intensities: the equation matters. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 43:639–642. https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2017-0781
Martin JC, Milliken DL, Cobb JE et al (1998) Validation of a mathematical model for road cycling power. J Appl Biomech 14:276–291. https://doi.org/10.1123/jab.14.3.276
Nordeen-Snyder K (1977) The effect of bicycle seat height variation upon oxygen consumption and lower limb kinematics. Med Sci Sports Exerc 9:113–117
PedalChile (2020) Best saddle angle for climbing. In: Pedal Chile. https://pedalchile.com/blog/climbing-saddle-tilt. Accessed 29 Jun 2021
Péronnet F, Massicotte D (1991) Table of nonprotein respiratory quotient: an update. Can J Sport Sci 16:23–29
PinkBike (2019) Opinion: why is everyone talking about seat tube angles? In: Pinkbike. https://www.pinkbike.com/news/opinion-why-is-everyone-talking-about-seat-tube-angles.html. (Accessed 29 Jun 2021)
Price D, Donne B (1997) Effect of variation in seat tube angle at different seat heights on submaximal cycling performance in man. J Sports Sci 15:395–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/026404197367182
Salai M, Brosh T, Blankstein A et al (1999) Effect of changing the saddle angle on the incidence of low back pain in recreational bicyclists. Brit J Sport Med 33:398–400. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.33.6.398
Šarabon N, Fonda B, Markovic G (2012) Change of muscle activation patterns in uphill cycling of varying slope. Eur J Appl Physiol 112:2615–2623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-011-2236-1
Sequenzia G, Fatuzzo G, Oliveri SM, Barbagallo R (2016) Interactive re-design of a novel variable geometry bicycle saddle to prevent neurological pathologies. Int J Interact Des Manuf 10:165–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-015-0293-0
Union Cycliste Internationale (2021) Clarification guide of the UCI technical regulation. Union Cycliste Internationale. https://www.uci.org/docs/default-source/equipment/clarificationguideoftheucitechnicalregulation-2018-05-02-eng_english.pdf?sfvrsn=fd56e265_92
Funding
Supported by an unrestricted gift from Koch-Bein, LLC.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
RDW and RK contributed to all aspects of this study.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Koch-Bein LLC have a patent pending for a saddle-related mechanism. Our laboratory also receives unrestricted financial gifts from Specialized Bicycle Components Inc., but they did not commission or fund this specific study.
Data availability
Data can be found at https://osf.io/56jxu/.
Code availability
Not applicable.
Additional information
Communicated by Jean - Rene Lacour.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wilkinson, R.D., Kram, R. Nose-down saddle tilt improves gross efficiency during seated-uphill cycling. Eur J Appl Physiol 122, 409–414 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-021-04841-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-021-04841-y