Advertisement

European Journal of Applied Physiology

, Volume 119, Issue 2, pp 399–407 | Cite as

Effect of different knee flexion angles with a constant hip and knee torque on the muscle forces and neuromuscular activities of hamstrings and gluteus maximus muscles

  • Yoshiki MotomuraEmail author
  • Hiroshige Tateuchi
  • Sayaka Nakao
  • Itsuroh Shimizu
  • Takehiro Kato
  • Yuta Kondo
  • Noriaki Ichihashi
Original Article
  • 123 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

This study examined the effect of different knee flexion angles with a constant hip and knee torque on the muscle force and neuromuscular activity of the hamstrings and gluteus maximus.

Methods

Twenty healthy males lay in prone position and held their lower limb with hip flexion at 45° and knee flexion at either 10° or 80°. At these angles, the hip and knee torques are identical. Under three load conditions: passive (referred to as Unloaded), active (Loaded), and active with 3-kg weight added to the shank (Loaded + 3 kg), the muscle stiffness (i.e., an indicator of muscle force) and neuromuscular activity of the hamstrings and gluteus maximus were measured using shear wave elastography and surface electromyography.

Results

The muscle stiffness and neuromuscular activity of the hamstrings and gluteus maximus increased significantly with the load. Muscle stiffness in the hamstrings was significantly lower at knee flexion of 80° than at 10° for Unloaded, but not for either Loaded or Loaded + 3 kg. The neuromuscular activity of the hamstrings was significantly greater at knee flexion of 80° than at 10° for both Loaded and Loaded + 3 kg. The muscle stiffness or neuromuscular activity of the gluteus maximus showed no significant differences between knee angles.

Conclusions

When the passive force in the hamstrings decreases with knee flexion, sufficient muscle force to maintain the hip and knee torques against an external load is generated by preferentially increasing the neuromuscular activity of the hamstrings, rather than increasing the synergetic muscle force.

Keywords

Muscle force Neuromuscular activity Shear wave elastography Electromyography Hamstrings Gluteus maximus 

Abbreviations

EMG

Electromyography

MVC

Maximal voluntary contraction

SWE

Shear wave elastography

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all participants involved in this study. This study was not funded by any institutions, agencies, or companies.

Author contributions

YM, HT, SN, and NI conceived and designed the research. YM, IS, TK, and YK conducted the experiments. YM, HT, and NI analyzed the data. YM, HT, SN, and NI wrote the manuscript. All the authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All the procedures performed in the studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants involved in the study.

References

  1. Alnahdi AH, Zeni JA, Snyder-Mackler L (2012) Muscle impairments in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Sports Health 4:284–292.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1941738112445726 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bercoff J, Tanter M, Fink M (2004) Supersonic shear imaging: a new technique for soft tissue elasticity mapping. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 51:396–409.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TUFFC.2004.1295425 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Botanlioglu H, Kantarci F, Kaynak G, Unal Y, Ertan S, Aydingoz O, Erginer R, Unlu MC, Mihmanli I, Babacan M (2013) Shear wave elastography properties of vastus lateralis and vastus medialis obliquus muscles in normal subjects and female patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome. Skelet Radiol 42:659–666.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-012-1520-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bouillard K, Nordez A, Hug F (2011) Estimation of individual muscle force using elastography. PLoS One 6:1–7.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0029261 Google Scholar
  5. Buford WL Jr, Ivey FM Jr, Malone JD, Patterson RM, Peare GL, Nguyen DK, Stewart AA (1997) Muscle balance at the knee - Moment arms for the normal knee and the ACL-minus knee. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 5:367–379.  https://doi.org/10.1109/86.650292 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chleboun GS, France AR, Crill MT, Braddock HK, Howell JN (2001) In vivo measurement of fascicle length and pennation angle of the human biceps femoris muscle. Cells Tissues Organs 169:401–409.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000047908 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Du LJ, He W, Cheng LG, Li S, Pan YS, Gao J (2016) Ultrasound shear wave elastography in assessment of muscle stiffness in patients with Parkinson’s disease: a primary observation. Clin Imaging 40:1075–1080.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2016.05.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dubois G, Kheireddine W, Vergari C, Bonneau D, Thoreux P, Rouch P, Tanter M, Gennisson JL, Skalli W (2015) Reliable protocol for shear wave elastography of lower limb muscles at rest and during passive stretching. Ultrasound Med Biol 41:2284–2291.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2015.04.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ekstrom RA, Donatelli RA, Carp KC (2007) Electromyographic analysis of core trunk, hip, and thigh muscles during 9 rehabilitation exercises. J Orthop Sport Phys Ther 37:754–762.  https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2007.2471 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fujisawa H, Suzuki H, Yamaguchi E, Yoshiki H, Wada Y, Watanabe A (2014) Hip muscle activity during isometric contraction of hip abduction. J Phys Ther Sci 26:187–190.  https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.26.187 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gennisson JL, Deffieux T, Macé E, Montaldo G, Fink M, Tanter M (2010) Viscoelastic and anisotropic mechanical properties of in vivo muscle tissue assessed by supersonic shear imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol 36:789–801.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2010.02.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kellis E, Baltzopoulos V (1999) In vivo determination of the patella tendon and hamstrings moment arms in adult males using videofluoroscopy during submaximal knee extension and flexion. Clin Biomech 14:118–124.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0268-0033(98)00055-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Koo TK, Guo JY, Cohen JH, Parker KJ (2013) Relationship between shear elastic modulus and passive muscle force: an ex-vivo study. J Biomech 46:2053–2059.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.05.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kwon YJ, Lee HO (2013) How different knee flexion angles influence the hip extensor in the prone position. J Phys Ther Sci 25:1295–1297.  https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.25.1295 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Le Sant G, Ates F, Brasseur JL, Nordez A (2015) Elastography study of hamstring behaviors during passive stretching. PLoS One 10:1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139272 Google Scholar
  16. Lewis CL, Sahrmann SA, Moran DW (2009) Effect of position and alteration in synergist muscle force contribution on hip forces when performing hip strengthening exercises. Clin Biomech 24:35–42.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2008.09.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lunnen JD, Yack J, LeVeau BF (1981) Relationship between muscle length, muscle activity and torque of the hamstring muscles. Phys Ther 61:190–195.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0268-0033(02)00070-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lyons K, Perry J, Gronley JK, Barnes L, Antonelli D (1983) Timing and relative intensity of hip extensor and abductor muscle action during level and stair ambulation. An EMG study. Phys Ther 63:1597–1605.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/63.10.1597 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Maïsetti O, Hug F, Bouillard K, Nordez A (2012) Characterization of passive elastic properties of the human medial gastrocnemius muscle belly using supersonic shear imaging. J Biomech 45:978–984.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.01.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Medda BK, Lang IM, Dodds WJ, Christl M, Kern M, Hogan WJ, Shaker R (1997) Correlation of electrical and contractile activities of the cricopharyngeus muscle in the cat. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 273:G470–G479.  https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpgi.1997.273.2.G470 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mohamed O, Perry J, Hislop H (2002) Relationship between wire EMG activity, muscle length, and torque of the hamstrings. Clin Biomech 17:569–579.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0268-0033(02)00070-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Moltubakk MM, Eriksrud O, Paulsen G, Seynnes OR, Bojsen-Møller J (2016) Hamstrings functional properties in athletes with high musculo-skeletal flexibility. Scand J Med Sci Sport 26:659–665.  https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.12488 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Morgan DL, Allen DG (1999) Early events in stretch-induced muscle damage. J Appl Physiol 87:2007–2015.  https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1999.87.6.2007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Moritani T, deVries HA (1978) Reexamination of the relationship between the surface integrated electromyogram (IEMG) and force of isometric contraction. Am J Phys Med 57:263–277Google Scholar
  25. Nordez A, Hug F (2010) Muscle shear elastic modulus measured using supersonic shear imaging is highly related to muscle activity level. J Appl Physiol 108:1389–1394.  https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.01323.2009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Park SJ, Kim CB, Park SC (1999) Anthropometric and biomechanical characteristics on body segments of Koreans. Appl Hum Sci 18:91–99.  https://doi.org/10.2114/jpa.18.91 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pranata A, Perraton L, El-Ansary D, Clark R, Fortin K, Dettmann T, Brandham R, Bryant A (2017) Lumbar extensor muscle force control is associated with disability in people with chronic low back pain. Clin Biomech 46:46–51.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2017.05.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rassier DE, Macintosh BR, Herzog W (1999) Length dependence of active force production in skeletal muscle. J Appl Physiol 86:1445–1457.  https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1999.86.5.1445 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schache MB, McClelland JA, Webster KE (2014) Lower limb strength following total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Knee 21:12–20.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2013.08.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shinohara M, Sabra K, Gennisson JL, Fink M, Tanter M (2010) Real-time visualization of muscle stiffness distribution with ultrasound shear wave imaging during muscle contraction. Muscle Nerve 42:438–441.  https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.21723 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tateuchi H, Shiratori S, Ichihashi N (2015) The effect of angle and moment of the hip and knee joint on iliotibial band hardness. Gait Posture 41:522–528.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.12.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tateuchi H, Shiratori S, Ichihashi N (2016) The effect of three-dimensional postural change on shear elastic modulus of the iliotibial band. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 28:137–142.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2016.04.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Worrell TW, Karst G, Adamczyk D, Moore R, Stanley C, Steimel B, Steimel S (2001) Influence of joint position on electromyographic and torque generation during maximal voluntary isometric contractions of the hamstrings and gluteus maximus muscles. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 31:730–740.  https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2001.31.12.730 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Human Health Sciences, Graduate School of MedicineKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
  2. 2.Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Fukui General ClinicNittazuka Medical Welfare CenterFukuiJapan

Personalised recommendations