Differences in elbow extensor muscle characteristics between resistance-trained men and women
Muscular strength is suggested to be dependent upon muscle characteristics. Yet, sex-specific relationships of muscle characteristics to strength in the resistance-trained require investigation. Therefore, the purpose was to evaluate sex differences in muscle characteristics and isometric strength in the elbow extensors, as well as their respective associations.
Resistance-trained men (n = 15, mean ± SD 22 ± 4 years, 87.5 ± 12.8 kg, 16.9 ± 2.9% body fat) and women (n = 15, mean ± SD 25 ± 5 years, 59.3 ± 7.3 kg, 22.4 ± 4.2% body fat) were tested. B-mode ultrasound images assessed muscle thickness, pennation angle, and echo intensity. Muscle volume and fascicle length were estimated from previously validated equations. Maximal voluntary isometric contraction measured elbow extensors isometric strength. Independent samples t-tests and Fisher’s r-to-z test examined differences between sexes.
Sex differences existed in all muscle characteristics (p < 0.05). Men’s absolute strength (27.86 ± 3.55 kg) was significantly greater than women (16.15 ± 3.15 kg), but no differences were noted when controlling for muscle volume (men 0.069 ± 0.017, women 0.077 ± 0.022 kg/cm3). Sex differences did not exist in the relationships of muscle characteristics to strength with muscle size having the largest correlations. However, the relationship between echo intensity and body fat was different in men (r = − 0.311) and women (r = 0.541, p = 0.0143).
Sex differences in isometric elbow extensor strength are eliminated when expressed relative to muscle volume. Relationships of echo intensity and body fat were different between men and women and may be indicative of greater adipose infiltration in women.
KeywordsEcho intensity Gender MVIC Strength Ultrasound
Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry
Lean body mass
There was no funding received for this work, nor relationships with companies or manufacturers who will benefit from the results of this study.
JM and MJ conceived and designed research. JM, JW, and EH conducted experiments. JO, JW, and JS analyzed data. JM, MJ, JW wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflict of interest.
- Bolsterlee B, Gandevia SC, Herbert RD (2016) Effect of transducer orientation on errors in ultrasound image-based measurements of human medial gastrocnemius muscle fascicle length and pennation. PLoS One 11:e0157273. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157273 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Earlbaum Associates. HilsdaleGoogle Scholar
- Fukumoto Y, Ikezoe T, Tateuchi H et al (2012a) Muscle mass and composition of the hip, thigh and abdominal muscles in women with and without hip osteoarthritis. Ultrasound Med Biol 38:1540–1545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2012.04.016 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kawakami Y, Abe T, Fukunaga T (1993) Muscle-fiber pennation angles are greater in hypertrophied than in normal muscles. J Appl Physiol Bethesda Md 1985 74:2740–2744Google Scholar
- Liu G, Li J, Zhou H et al (2016) A simple way to improve the relative and absolute reliability of handheld dynamometer measurements using learners. Int J Clin Exp Med 9:199–208Google Scholar
- Pillen S, Tak RO, Zwarts MJ et al (2009) Skeletal muscle ultrasound: correlation between fibrous tissue and echo intensity. Ultrasound Med Biol 35:443–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2008.09.016 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar