Cardio-pulmonary responses to incremental eccentric and concentric cycling tests to task failure
- 306 Downloads
This study compared cardio-pulmonary responses between incremental concentric and eccentric cycling tests, and examined factors affecting the maximal eccentric cycling capacity.
On separate days, nine men and two women (32.6 ± 9.4 years) performed an upright seated concentric (CON) and an eccentric (ECC) cycling test, which started at 75 W and increased 25 W min−1 until task failure. Gas exchange, heart rate (HR) and power output were continuously recorded during the tests. Participants also performed maximal voluntary contractions of the quadriceps (MVC), squat and countermovement jumps.
Peak power output was 53% greater (P < 0.001, g = 1.77) for ECC (449 ± 115 W) than CON (294 ± 61 W), but peak oxygen consumption was 43% lower (P < 0.001, g = 2.18) for ECC (30.6 ± 5.6 ml kg min−1) than CON (43.9 ± 6.9 ml kg min−1). Maximal HR was not different between ECC (175 ± 20 bpm) and CON (182 ± 13 bpm), but the increase in HR relative to oxygen consumption was 33% greater (P = 0.01) during ECC than CON. Moderate to strong correlations (P < 0.05) were observed between ECC peak power output and CON peak power (r = 0.84), peak oxygen consumption (r = 0.54) and MVC (r = 0.53), while no significant relationships were observed between ECC peak power output and squat as well as countermovement jump heights.
Unexpectedly, maximal HR was similar between CON and ECC. Although ECC power output can be predicted from CON peak power output, an incremental eccentric cycling test performed after 3–6 familiarisation sessions may be useful in programming ECC training with healthy and accustomed individuals.
KeywordsLengthening contraction Oxygen consumption Heart rate Peak power output Maximal voluntary contraction Graded exercise test
Incremental concentric cycling test
Incremental eccentric cycling test
Maximal voluntary isometric contraction
Rating of perceived exertion
Peak oxygen consumption
This study was supported by an International Postgraduate Research Scholarship that was awarded the first author.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
There was no conflict of interest.
- Bonde-Petersen F, Henriksson J, Knuttgen HG (1973) Effect of training with eccentric muscle contractions on skeletal muscle metabolites. Acta Physiol Scand 88:564–570. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-1716.1973.tb05485.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lastayo PC, Reich TE, Urquhart M et al (1999) Chronic eccentric exercise: improvements in muscle strength can occur with little demand for oxygen. Am J Physiol 276:R611-615Google Scholar
- LaStayo P, Pifer J, Pierotti D, Lindstedt S (2008) Electromyographic adaptations elicited by submaximal exercise in those naive to and in those adapted to eccentric exercise: a descriptive report. J Strength Cond Res 22:833–838. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e31816a5825 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pfeiffer JJ, Quintana R, Parker DL (2005) The influence of graded exercise test selection on Pmax and a subsequent single interval bout. J Exerc Physiol 8:10–17Google Scholar