Validity of the Polar V800 monitor for measuring heart rate variability in mountain running route conditions
- 503 Downloads
This study was conducted to test, in mountain running route conditions, the accuracy of the Polar V800™ monitor as a suitable device for monitoring the heart rate variability (HRV) of runners.
Eighteen healthy subjects ran a route that included a range of running slopes such as those encountered in trail and ultra-trail races. The comparative study of a V800 and a Holter SEER 12 ECG Recorder™ included the analysis of RR time series and short-term HRV analysis. A correction algorithm was designed to obtain the corrected Polar RR intervals. Six 5-min segments related to different running slopes were considered for each subject.
The correlation between corrected V800 RR intervals and Holter RR intervals was very high (r = 0.99, p < 0.001), and the bias was less than 1 ms. The limits of agreement (LoA) obtained for SDNN and RMSSD were (− 0.25 to 0.32 ms) and (− 0.90 to 1.08 ms), respectively. The effect size (ES) obtained in the time domain HRV parameters was considered small (ES < 0.2). Frequency domain HRV parameters did not differ (p > 0.05) and were well correlated (r ≥ 0.96, p < 0.001).
Narrow limits of agreement, high correlations and small effect size suggest that the Polar V800 is a valid tool for the analysis of heart rate variability in athletes while running high endurance events such as marathon, trail, and ultra-trail races.
KeywordsValidation Polar V800 heart rate monitor HRV Open field running conditions
Global positioning system
Power in the high-frequency band
Normalized HF power
Heart rate monitors
Heart rate variability
Power in the low-frequency band
Normalized LF power
Limits of agreement
Proportion of differences between adjacent NN intervals of more than 50 ms
Total power of the spectral density
Root mean square of differences of successive NN intervals
Standard deviation of all NN intervals
Error type 1 to 6b
Power in the very low-frequency band
Participated in research design: PC, PG, EG, LM, AP and NS. Conducted experiments: FS and NS. Performed data analysis: PC, PG, AP and FS. Wrote or contributed to the writing of the manuscript: PC, PG, EG, LM, AP, FS and NS.
This work was supported in part within the framework of the Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad (MINECO) Grant TEC2014–60337–R, the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under Grant Agreement No. 633196 (CATCH ME), and the Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red (CIBER) of Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine, an initiative of the Instituto de Salud“ Carlos III” (ISCIII).
Compliance with ethical standards
A group of 22 consecutively recruited volunteers gave their written informed consent to participate in this study.
The protocol was reviewed and approved by the Healthcare Ethics Committee of the Hospital Clínic of Barcelona (2013/8255).
Conflict of interest
Pere Caminal, Fuensanta Sola, Pedro Gomis, Eduard Guasch, Alexandre Perera, Núria Soriano, and Lluis Mont declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
- Burg JP (1975) Maximum entropy spectral analysis. Dissertation, Stanford UniversityGoogle Scholar
- Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Eribaum Associates, HillsdaleGoogle Scholar
- Mateo J, Serrano P, Bailón R et al (2001) Heart rate variability measurements during exercise test may improve the diagnosis of ischemic heart disease. Proc 23rd Ann Int Conf IEEE 503–506Google Scholar
- Melia U, Roca E, Brotons et al (2014) Heart rate variability in ultra-trail runners. Comput Cardiol 41:997–1000Google Scholar
- Rocha AP, Almeida R, Leite A, Silva MJ, Silva ME (2014) Long-term HRV in critically ill pediatric patients: coma versus brain death. Comput Cardiol 41:89–92Google Scholar
- Thomas JR, Nelson JK, Silverman SJ (2015) Research methods in physical activity. Human Kinetics Publishers, ChampaignGoogle Scholar