Effects of acute resistance training modality on corticospinal excitability, intra-cortical and neuromuscular responses
- 712 Downloads
Although neural adaptations from strength training are known to occur, the acute responses associated with heavy-strength (HST) and hypertrophy training (HYT) remain unclear. Therefore, we aimed to compare the acute behaviour of corticospinal responses following a single session of HST vs HYT over a 72-h period.
Fourteen participants completed a random counterbalanced, crossover study that consisted of a single HST session [5 sets × 3 repetition maximum (RM)], a HYT session (3 sets × 12 RM) of the leg extensors and a control session (CON). Single- and paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was used to measure changes in motor-evoked potential (MEP) amplitude, corticospinal silent period (CSP), intra-cortical facilitation (ICF), short-interval intra-cortical inhibition (SICI) and long-interval intra-cortical inhibition (LICI). Additionally, maximal muscle compound wave (M MAX) of the rectus femoris (RF) and maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) of the leg extensors were taken. All measures were taken at baseline, immediately post and 2, 6, 24, 48 and 72 h post-training.
A significant condition x time interaction was observed for MVIC (P = 0.001), M MAX (P = 0.003), MEP amplitude (P < 0.001) and CSP (P = 0.002). No differences were observed between HST and HYT for all neurophysiological measures. No changes in SICI, ICF and LICI were observed compared to baseline.
Our results suggest that: (1) the acute behaviour of neurophysiological measures is similar between HST and HYT; and (2) the increase in corticospinal excitability may be a compensatory response to attenuate peripheral fatigue.
KeywordsTranscranial magnetic stimulation Heavy-strength Hypertrophy Neurophysiological Fatigue Recovery
Corticospinal silent period
Transcranial magnetic stimulation
Long interval cortical inhibition
Motor evoked potential
Maximal voluntary isometric contraction
Maximal compound wave
Short interval cortical inhibition
We would like to thank all participants for their contribution to this study. CL is supported by an Australian Postgraduate Award. WPT is supported by an Alfred Deakin Postdoctoral Fellowship.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Bompa T, Haff G (2009) Periodization, theory and methodology of training, 5th edn. Human kinetic, ChampaignGoogle Scholar
- Brzycki M (1993) Strength testing—predicting a one-rep max from reps to fatigue. JOPERD 64:88–90Google Scholar
- Christ CB, Slaughter MH, Stillman RJ, Cameron J, Boileau RSA (1994) Reliability of selected parameters of isometric muscle function associated with testing 3 days × 3 trials in women. J Str Cond Res 8:65–71Google Scholar
- Deschenes M, Maresh C, Kraemer W (1994) The neuromuscular junction: structure, function, and its role in excitation of the muscle. J Strength Cond Res 8(2):103–109Google Scholar
- Field A (2013) Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics, 3rd edn. SAGE publications, London, p 459Google Scholar
- Gandevia SC, Butler JE, Allen GM, Taylor JL (1994) Prolongation of the ‘silent’ period following transcranial magnetic stimulation during human muscle fatigue. J Physiol 480:110Google Scholar
- Haff GG, Triplett TN (2016) Essentials of strength training and conditioning. NSCA-National Strength and Conditioning Association, 4th edn, 5th edn. Human kinetic, ChampaignGoogle Scholar
- Krustrup P, Soderlund K, Mohr M, Gonzalez-Alonso J, Bangsbo J (2004) Recruitment of fibre types and quadriceps muscle portions during repeated, intense knee-extensor exercise in humans. J Physiol 449(1):56–65Google Scholar
- Latella C, Hendy AM, Pearce AJ, VanderWesthuizen D, Teo W-P (2016) The time-course of acute changes in corticospinal excitability, intra-cortical inhibition and facilitation following a single-session heavy strength training of the biceps brachii. Front Hum Neurosci 10:607CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Rothwell JC, Hallett M, Berardelli A, Eisen A, Rossini P, Paulus W (1999) Magnetic stimulation: motor evoked potentials. The international federation of clinical neurophysiology. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol Suppl 52:97–103Google Scholar
- Verin E, Ross E, Demoule A, Hopkinson N, Nickol A, Fauroux B, Moxham J, Similowski T, Polkey MI (2004) Effects of exhaustive incremental treadmill exercise on diaphragm and quadriceps motor potentials evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation. J Appl Physiol 1:253–259Google Scholar