References
Balshaw TG, Massey GJ, Maden-Wilkinson TM et al (2017) Changes in agonist neural drive, hypertrophy and pre-training strength all contribute to the individual strength gains after resistance training. Eur J Appl Physiol 117:631–640
Buckner SL, Dankel SJ, Mattocks KT et al (2016) The problem of muscle hypertrophy: revisited. Muscle Nerve 54:1012–1014
Buckner SL, Dankel SJ, Mattocks KT et al (2017) Muscle size and strength: another study not designed to answer the question. Eur J Appl Physiol (accepted)
Erskine RM, Fletcher G, Folland JP (2014) The contribution of muscle hypertrophy to strength changes following resistance training. Eur J Appl Physiol 114:1239–1249
Narici MV, Hoppeler H, Kayser B et al (1996) Human quadriceps cross-sectional area, torque and neural activation during 6 months strength training. Acta Physiol Scand 157:175–186
Powell PL, Roy RR, Kanim P et al (1984) Predictability of skeletal muscle tension from architectural determinations in guinea pig hindlimbs. J Appl Physiol 57:1715–1721
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Communicated by Klaas R. Westerterp/Håkan Westerblad.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Balshaw, T.G., Massey, G.J., Maden-Wilkinson, T.M. et al. Muscle size and strength: debunking the “completely separate phenomena” suggestion. Eur J Appl Physiol 117, 1275–1276 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-017-3616-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-017-3616-y