The effect of transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex on exercise-induced pain
- 742 Downloads
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) provides a new exciting means to investigate the role of the brain during exercise. However, this technique is not widely used in exercise science, with little known regarding effective electrode montages. This study investigated whether tDCS of the motor cortex (M1) would elicit an analgesic response to exercise-induced pain (EIP).
Nine participants completed a VO2max test and three time to exhaustion (TTE) tasks on separate days following either 10 min 2 mA tDCS of the M1, a sham or a control. Additionally, seven participants completed 3 cold pressor tests (CPT) following the same experimental conditions (tDCS, SHAM, CON). Using a well-established tDCS protocol, tDCS was delivered by placing the anodal electrode above the left M1 with the cathodal electrode above dorsolateral right prefrontal cortex. Gas exchange, blood lactate, EIP and ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) were monitored during the TTE test. Perceived pain was recorded during the CPT.
During the TTE, no significant differences in time to exhaustion, RPE or EIP were found between conditions. However, during the CPT, perceived pain was significantly (P < 0.05) reduced in the tDCS condition (7.4 ± 1.2) compared with both the CON (8.6 ± 1.0) and SHAM (8.4 ± 1.3) conditions.
These findings demonstrate that stimulation of the M1 using tDCS does not induce analgesia during exercise, suggesting that the processing of pain produced via classic measures of experimental pain (i.e., a CPT) is different to that of EIP. These results provide important methodological advancement in developing the use of tDCS in exercise.
KeywordsFatigue Pain perception Performance tDCS Exercise
Blood lactate concentration
Cold pressor test
Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex
Experimental condition (tDCS intervention)
Rating of perceived exertion
Transcranial direct current stimulation
Time to exhaustion
Conflict of interest
- Amann M, Blain GM, Proctor LT, Sebranek JJ, Pegelow DF, Dempsey JA (2011) Implications of group III and IV muscle afferents for high-intensity endurance exercise performance in humans. J Physiol (1)589: 299–309Google Scholar
- Borg GA (1998) Borg’s perceived exertion and pain scales. Human Kinetics, ChampaignGoogle Scholar
- Brodal A (1981) Neurological anatomy, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Craig AD, Bushnell MC, Zhang ET, Blomqvist A (1994) A thalamic nucleus specific for pain and temperature sensation. Nature 22–29:372Google Scholar
- Lampropoulou SI, Nowicky AV (2013) The effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on perception of effort in an isolated isometric elbow flexion task. Mot Control 17(4):412–426Google Scholar
- Mauger AR (2013) Fatigue is a pain—the use of novel neurophysiological techniques to understand the fatigue-pain relationship. Front Physiol 13(4):104Google Scholar
- Mauger AR, Jones AM, Williams CA (2010) Influence of acetaminophen on performance during time trial cycling. J Appl Physiol 98(1):104Google Scholar
- Nijs J, Kosek E, Van Oosterwijck J, Meeus M (2012) Dysfunctional endogenous analgesia during exercise in patients with chronic pain: to exercise or not to exercise? Pain Physician 15(3):205–213Google Scholar
- Noakes TD (2012) Fatigue is a brain-derived emotion that regulates the exercise behavior to ensure the protection of whole body homeostasis. Front Physiol 11(3):82Google Scholar
- Okano AH, Fontes EB, Montenegro RA, Farinatti PD, Cyrino ES, Li LM, Bikson M, Noakes TD (2013) Brain stimulation modulates the autonomic nervous system, rating of perceived exertion and performance during maximal exercise. Br J Sports Med. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2012-091658