Fatigue development in the finger flexor muscle differs between keyboard and mouse use
- 330 Downloads
The aim of the present study was to determine whether there were any physiological changes in the muscle as a result of intensive computer use.
Using a repeated measures experimental design, eighteen subjects participated in four different 8-h conditions: a control (no exposure) condition and three exposure conditions comprised of 6 h of computer use (keyboard, mouse, and combined keyboard and mouse use) followed by 2 h of recovery. In each condition, using 2 Hz neuromuscular electrical stimulation, eight temporal measurements were collected to evaluate the fatigue state (twitch force, contraction time, and ½ relaxation time) of the right middle finger Flexor Digitorum Superficialis (FDS) muscle before, during, and after computer use.
The results indicated that 6 h of keyboard, mouse, and combined mouse and keyboard use all caused temporal fatigue-related changes in physiological state of the FDS muscle. Keyboard use resulted in muscle potentiation, which was characterized by approximately 30 % increase in twitch force (p < 0.0001) and 3 % decrease (p = 0.04) in twitch durations. Mouse use resulted in a combined state of potentiation and fatigue, which was characterized by an increase in twitch forces (p = 0.002) but a prolonging (11 %) rather than a shortening of twitch durations (p < 0.0001).
When comparing mouse and keyboard use, the more substantial change in the physiological state of the muscle with mouse use (potentiation and fatigue compared to just potentiation with keyboard use) provides some physiological evidence which may explain why mouse use has a greater association with computer-related injuries.
KeywordsElectrical stimulation Muscle fatigue Computer use Musculoskeletal disorders
This study was supported by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health under an R21 Grant (OH009088-02) and Washington State Medical Aid and Accident Fund. The authors would like to thank all the participants for taking part in this study.
Conflict of interest
No conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise, are declared by the authors.
- Andersen JH, Fallentin N, Thomsen JF, Mikkelsen S (2011) Risk factors for neck and upper extremity disorders among computers users and the effect of interventions: an overview of systematic reviews. PLoS ONE 6(5):11Google Scholar
- Enoka RM (2002) Neuromechanics of human movement. Human Kinetics, ChampaignGoogle Scholar
- Hanchard NCA, Williamson M, Caley RW, Cooper RG (1998) Electrical stimulation of human tibialis anterior: (A) contractile properties are stable over a range of submaximal voltages; (B) high- and low-frequency fatigue are inducible and reliably assessable at submaximal voltages. Clin Rehabil 12(5):413–427PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Light AR, Vierck CJ, Light KC (2010) Myalgia and fatigue: translation from mouse sensory neurons to fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndromes. In: Translational pain research: from mouse to man. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
- MacIntosh BR, Gardiner PF, McComas AJ (2006) Skeletal muscle: form and function. Human Kinetics, ChampaignGoogle Scholar
- Oleary DD, Hope K, Sale DG (1997) Posttetanic potentiation of human dorsiflexors. J Appl Physiol 83(6):2131–2138Google Scholar
- Tayyari F, Smith JL (1997) Occupational ergonomics: principles and applications. Manufacturing systems engineering series. Chapman & Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar