Kinematic, kinetic and electromyographic adaptation to speed and resistance in double poling cross country skiing
- 553 Downloads
This study incorporated variations in speed and the horizontal resistance acting upon elite female skiers during double poling (DP) on a treadmill and specifically analyzed biomechanical adaptations to these variations. Whole body kinematics and pole force data were recorded and used to calculate the moment of force acting on the shoulder and elbow joints. Data were obtained with a 3D optoelectronic system using reflective markers at given anatomical landmarks. Forces along the long axis of the right pole were measured with a piezoelectric force transducer. Surface electrodes were used to record EMG activity in the rectus femoris, rectus abdominis, latissimus dorsi and triceps brachii muscles. In a first set of recordings, the participants double poled with zero elevation at five different speeds from 8 to 17 km h−1. In a second set of recordings, horizontal resistance was added by weights (0.4–1.9 kg) attached to a pulley system pulling the skier posteriorly during DP at 14 km h−1. Results showed increasing relative duration of the thrust phase with increasing resistance, but not with speed. Significant kinematic differences occurred with increase in both speed and resistance. The mean (±SD) horizontal force components ranged between 1.7 (±1.3) and 2.8 (±1.1) percent (%) bodyweight (BW) in the speed adaptation and 3.1 (±0.6) and 4.0 (±1.3) % BW in the adaptation to horizontal resistance. Peak muscle activity showed a central to peripheral (proximo-distal) activation sequence. The temporal cycle phase pattern in the adaptation to speed and horizontal resistance differed.
KeywordsCross country skiing Double poling Resistance Speed Joint moments
The authors would like to thank Olga Tarassova for her assistance with data and statistical analysis.
Conflict of interest
The authors report no conflicts of interest relating to this study.
- Dempster W (1955) Space requirements of the seated operator. Geometrical, kinematic, and mechanical aspects of the body with special reference to the limbs. Technical Report WADC-TR-55-159, Wright-Patterson Air Force Bace, Dayton, OH, USAGoogle Scholar
- Komi P (1987) Force measurements during cross-country skiing. Int J Sport Biomech 3(4):370–381Google Scholar
- Nilsson J, Jakobsen V, Tveit P, Smith G (2004a) Poling force changes with speed in diagonal and double poling skiing techniques. Abstract. In: Proceedings of the international congress of skiing in science, Aspen, USAGoogle Scholar
- Rusko H (1989) Oxygen uptake and blood lactate concentration during diagonal skiing and double poling in cross-country skiers. In: Charles J. Dillman et al. (eds) Proceedings of the first IOC world congress on sport sciences. Colorado Springs. United States Olympic Committee, pp 108–109Google Scholar
- Smith GA (2002) Biomechanics of cross country skiing. In: Rusko H (ed) Handbook of sports medicine and science: cross country skiing. Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp 32–61Google Scholar
- Smith G, McNitt-Gray J, Nelson R (1988) Kinematic analysis of alternate stride skating in cross-country skiing. Int J Sport Biomech 4(1):49–58Google Scholar
- Smith G, Fewster J, Braudt S (1996) Double poling kinematics performance in cross-country skiing. J Appl Biomech 12(1):88–103Google Scholar
- Smith G, Nilsson J, Kvamme B, Ure J, Ingjer F (2005) Arm, trunk and leg contributions to double poling performance in cross-country skiing. Abstract to proceedings in: Americal College of Sports Medicine, St. LouisGoogle Scholar
- Tagliabue M, Canclini A, Pozzo R, Cotelli C, Bonomi R, Baroni G (2004) Ground reaction forces from poles and ski in cross-country skiing and 3-D kinematic analysis. In: Müller E, Bacharach D, Klika R, Lindinger S, Schwameder H (eds) Science and skiing III. Meyer & Meyer Sport, Oxford, pp 341–346Google Scholar
- Zatsiorsky V (2002) Kinetics of human movement. Human Kinetics, Champaigne, IL, USA. ISBN: 0-7360-3778-0Google Scholar