Attempting to better define “intensity” for muscular performance: is it all wasted effort?
- 462 Downloads
We read with interest the recent publication “Muscle activations under varying lifting speeds and intensities during bench press” (Sakamoto and Sinclair 2012). In the title and throughout this paper, the term intensity is used. We suggest that this usage is inaccurate, both here and more widely, with reference to the percentage of one repetition maximum (%1RM), e.g. the higher the %1RM, the higher the intensity (Sakamoto and Sinclair 2012). However, %1RM is simply a reference to load. Authors have attempted to justify this use (e.g. Fry 2004; Willardson and Burkett 2008) by pointing out that intensity is a common term for %1RM. A major problem with this argument is the inability of this term to accommodate effort, load, repetitions, inter-individual genetic influences such as muscle fiber type and repetition duration. This letter intends to address these issues and more accurately define potentially confusing terminology.
Within the area of cardiovascular or aerobic...
KeywordsMuscle Fiber Type Bench Press Motor Unit Recruitment Term Intensity Relative Load
Conflict of interest
The authors are not aware of any conflicts of interest.
- Carpinelli R, Otto RM, Winett RA (2004) A critical analysis of the ACSM position stand on resistance training: insufficient evidence to support recommended training protocols. J Exerc Physiol 7:1–60Google Scholar
- Hoeger WW, Barette SL, Hale DF et al (1987) Relationship between repetitions and selected percentages of one-repetition maximum. J Appl Sport Sci Res 1:11–13Google Scholar
- Hoeger WW, Hopkins DR, Barette SL et al (1990) Relationship between repetitions and selected percentages of one-repetition maximum: a comparison between untrained and trained males and females. J Strength Cond Res 4:46–54Google Scholar
- Lachance PF, Hortobagyi T (1994) Influence of cadence on muscular performance during push-up and pull-up exercises. J Strength Cond Res 8:76–79Google Scholar