Advertisement

European Journal of Applied Physiology

, Volume 112, Issue 12, pp 4163–4172 | Cite as

Relevance of hand dominance to the bilateral deficit phenomenon

  • Andrew CornwellEmail author
  • Nazareth Khodiguian
  • Eun Jung Yoo
Original Article

Abstract

During maximal voluntary contractions, the sum of forces exerted by homonymous muscles when activated unilaterally (UL) is, typically, larger than the sum of forces when activated bilaterally (BL). This phenomenon is known as the bilateral deficit (BLD). Our purpose was to determine if the dominant limb would be inhibited to a greater degree in the BL condition, thereby reducing any disparity in force output between the limbs. Maximum voluntary handgrip strength was measured in 40 left-handed and 40 right-handed individuals under both BL and UL conditions. The right-handers displayed 10.4 % greater right hand strength in both conditions; the left-handers exhibited 5.5 % greater left hand strength in the UL and 4.3 % in the BL condition. A BLD (−1.30 %) was present in the left-handed group only but a reduction in the force disparity between the hands was not evident. It was observed, however, that seven individuals from each group exhibited greater UL force with their non-dominant hand. Accordingly, we re-analyzed the data after rearranging the groups based on unilateral hand grip strength dominance. A significant reduction in force disparity between the hands occurred for the left-handed group only, the result of a significant inhibition of the stronger left hand. A trend towards a similar reduction occurred for the right-handers because of a significant force reduction of the stronger right hand. Consequently, it appears that for maximum handgrip contractions, the BLD may be related to preferential inhibition of the stronger hand, especially for individuals who are left-hand-strength-dominant in terms of unilateral force output.

Keywords

Bilateral deficit Hand dominance Handgrip strength 

Notes

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Armstrong CA, Oldham JA (1999) A comparison of dominant and non-dominant hand strengths. J Hand Surg 24(4):421–425Google Scholar
  2. Bazzuchi I, Riccio ME, Felici F (2008) Tennis players show a lower coactivation of the elbow antagonist muscles during isokinetic exercises. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 18:752–759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bazzuchi I, Sbriccoli P, Marzattinocci G, Felici F (2006) Coactivation of the elbow antagonist muscles is not affected by the speed of movement in isokinetic exercise. Muscle Nerve 33:191–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carolan B, Cafarelli E (1992) Adaptations in coactivation after isometric resistance training. J Appl Physiol 73:911–917PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Clerke A, Clerke J (2001) A literature review of the effect of handedness on isometric grip strength differences of the left and right hands. Am J Occup Ther 55:206–211PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Crosby CA, Wehbé MA, Mawr B (1994) Hand strength: normative values. J Hand Surg 19(4):665–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Häkkinen K, Pastinen UM, Karsikas R, Linnamo V (1995) Neuromuscular performance in voluntary bilateral and unilateral contraction and during electrical stimulation in men at different ages. Eur J Appl Physiol 70:518–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Häkkinen K, Kallinen M, Izquierdo M et al (1998) Changes in agonist-antagonist EMG, muscle CSA and force during strength training in middle-aged and older people. J Appl Physiol 84:1341–1349PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Häkkinen K, Kraemer WJ, Newton RU, Alen M (2001) Changes in electromyographic activity, muscle fiber and force production characteristics during heavy resistance/power strength training in middle-aged and older men and women. Acta Physiol Scand 171(1):51–62PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Henry FM, Smith LE (1961) Simultaneous vs. separate bilateral muscular contractions in relation to neural overflow theory and neuromotor specificity. Res Q Exerc Sport 32:42–46Google Scholar
  11. Howard JD, Enoka RM (1991) Maximum bilateral contractions are modified by neurally mediated interlimb effects. J Appl Physiol 70:306–316PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Incel NA, Ceceli E, Durukan PB, Erdem HR, Yorgancioglu ZR (2002) Grip strength: effect of hand dominance. Singap Med J 43(5):234–237Google Scholar
  13. Jakobi JM, Cafarelli E (1998) Neuromuscular drive and force production are not altered during bilateral contractions. J Appl Physiol 84:200–206PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Jakobi JM, Chilibeck PD (2001) Bilateral and unilateral contractions: possible differences in maximal voluntary force. Can J Appl Physiol 26:12–33PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kamarul T, Loh WYC, Ahmad TS (2006) Normal hand grip strength in the Malaysian population. J Orthop Surg 14:172–177Google Scholar
  16. Kawakami Y, Sale DG, MacDougall JD, Moroz JS (1998) Bilateral deficit in plantar flexion: relation to knee joint position, muscle activation, and reflex excitability. Eur J Appl Physiol 77:212–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Khodiguian N, Cornwell A, Lares E, DiCaprio PA, Hawkins SA (2003) Expression of the bilateral deficit during reflexively evoked contractions. J Appl Physiol 94:171–178PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Koh TJ, Grabiner MD, Clough CA (1993) Bilateral deficit is larger for step than for ramp isometric contractions. J Appl Physiol 74:1200–1205PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Kornecki S (1992) Mechanism of muscular stabilization process in joints. J Biomech 25(3):235–245PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Matkowski B, Martin A, Lepers R (2011) Comparison of maximal unilateral versus bilateral voluntary contraction force. Eur J Appl Physiol 111(8):1571–1578Google Scholar
  21. Mitsionis G, Pakos EE, Stafilas KS, Paschos N, Papakostas T, Beris AE (2009) Normative data on handgrip strength in a Greek adult population. Int Orthop 33(3):713–717PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Morehouse SA, Szeligo F, DiTommaso E (2000) Characteristics of the bimanual deficit using grip strength. Laterality 5(2):167–185PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Oda S, Moritani T (1994) Maximal isometric force and neural activity during bilateral and unilateral elbow flexion in humans. Eur J Appl Physiol 69:240–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Oda S, Moritani T (1995a) Cross-correlation of bilateral differences in fatigue during sustained maximal voluntary contraction. Eur J Appl Physiol 70:305–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Oda S, Moritani T (1995b) Movement-related cortical potentials during handgrip contractions with special reference to force and electromyogram bilateral deficit. Eur J Appl Physiol 72:1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ohtsuki T (1981) Decrease in grip strength induced by simultaneous bilateral exertion with reference to finger strength. Ergonomics 24:37–48PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Owings TM, Grabiner MD (1998) Fatigue effects on the bilateral deficit are speed dependent. Med Sci Sports Exerc 30:1257–1262PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Post M, van Duinen H, Steens A, Renken R, Kuipers B, Maurits N, Zijdewind I (2007) Reduced cortical activity during maximal bilateral contractions of the index finger. Neuroimage 35(1):16–27PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rejc E, Lazzer S, Antonutto G, Isola M, di Prampero PE (2010) Bilateral deficit and EMG activity during explosive lower limb contractions against different overloads. Eur J Appl Physiol 108(1):157–165PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Taniguchi Y (1998) Relationship between the modifications of bilateral deficit in upper and lower limbs by resistance training in humans. Eur J Appl Physiol 78:226–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Vandervoort AA, Sale DG, Moroz JR (1984) Comparison of motor unit activation during unilateral and bilateral leg extension. J Appl Physiol 56:46–51PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Vandervoort AA, Sale DG, Moroz JR (1987) Strength-velocity relationship and fatigability of unilateral versus bilateral arm extension. Eur J Appl Physiol 56:201–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Van Dieën JH, Ogita F, De Haan A (2003) Reduced Neural drive in bilateral exertions: a performance limiting factor? Med Sci Sports Exerc 35(1):111–118PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Van Soest AJ, Roebroeck ME, Robbert MJ, Huling PA, Van Ingen Schenau GJ (1985) A comparison of one-legged and two-legged countermovement jumps. Med Sci Sports Exerc 17:635–639PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zipp P (1982) Recommendations for the standardization of lead positions in surface electromyography. Eur J Appl Physiol 50:41–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrew Cornwell
    • 1
    Email author
  • Nazareth Khodiguian
    • 1
  • Eun Jung Yoo
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Kinesiology and Nutritional ScienceCalifornia State University, Los AngelesLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.College of Physical Education, Kyung Hee UniversityYongin-siKorea

Personalised recommendations