The influence of vibration type, frequency, body position and additional load on the neuromuscular activity during whole body vibration
- 1.5k Downloads
This study aimed to assess the influence of different whole body vibration (WBV) determinants on the electromyographic (EMG) activity during WBV in order to identify those training conditions that cause highest neuromuscular responses and therefore provide optimal training conditions. In a randomized cross-over study, the EMG activity of six leg muscles was analyzed in 18 subjects with respect to the following determinants: (1) vibration type (side-alternating vibration (SV) vs. synchronous vibration (SyV), (2) frequency (5–10–15–20–25–30 Hz), (3) knee flexion angle (10°–30°–60°), (4) stance condition (forefoot vs. normal stance) and (5) load variation (no extra load vs. additional load equal to one-third of the body weight). The results are: (1) neuromuscular activity during SV was enhanced compared to SyV (P < 0.05); (2) a progressive increase in frequency caused a progressive increase in EMG activity (P < 0.05); (3) the EMG activity was highest for the knee extensors when the knee joint was 60° flexed (P < 0.05); (4) for the plantar flexors in the forefoot stance condition (P < 0.05); and (5) additional load caused an increase in neuromuscular activation (P < 0.05). In conclusion, large variations of the EMG activation could be observed across conditions. However, with an appropriate adjustment of specific WBV determinants, high EMG activations and therefore high activation intensities could be achieved in the selected muscles. The combination of high vibration frequencies with additional load on an SV platform led to highest EMG activities. Regarding the body position, a knee flexion of 60° and forefoot stance appear to be beneficial for the knee extensors and the plantar flexors, respectively.
KeywordsElectromyography Parameters Vibration Training Exercise
This study was funded by the Federal Institute for Sports Science (BISp AZ 070608/10).
- Berschin G, Sommer H-M (2004) Vibrationstraining und Gelenkstabilität: EMG-Untersuchungen zur Wirkung von Vibrationsfrequenz und Körperhaltung auf Muskelaktivierung und—koaktivierung. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Sportmedizin 55:152–156Google Scholar
- Merriman HL, Brahler CJ, Jackson K (2011) Systematically controlling for the influence of age, sex, hertz and time post-whole-body vibration exposure on four measures of physical performance in community-dwelling older adults: a randomized cross-over study. Curr Gerontol Geriatr Res [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
- Moritani T (2002) Motor unit and motoneurone excitability during explosive movement. In: Komi P (ed) Strength and power in sport, 2nd edn. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 27–49Google Scholar
- Rauch F, Sievanen H, Boonen S, Cardinale M, Degens H, Felsenberg D, Roth J, Schoenau E, Verschueren S, Rittweger J (2010) Reporting whole-body vibration intervention studies: recommendations of the International Society of Musculoskeletal and Neuronal Interactions. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 10:193–198PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rittweger J, Ehrig J, Just K, Mutschelknauss M, Kirsch KA, Felsenberg D (2003) Oxygen uptake in whole-body vibration exercise: influence of vibration frequency, amplitude, and external load. Int J Sports Med 23:428–432Google Scholar
- Sañudo B, Feria A, Carrasco L, Hoyo MD, Santos R, Gamboa H (2011) Gender differences in knee stability in response to whole body vibration. J Strength Cond Res [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar