Advertisement

European Journal of Applied Physiology

, Volume 112, Issue 6, pp 2303–2312 | Cite as

Self-regulation of exercise intensity by estimated time limit scale

  • M. GarcinEmail author
  • J. Coquart
  • J. Salleron
  • N. Voy
  • R. Matran
Original Article

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity of the estimated time limit scale (ETL), which deals with a subjective prediction of how long the current exercise intensity can be maintained, for regulating exercise intensity using typical estimation–production procedure. Thirty-six male athletes performed a continuous incremental test and two discontinuous tests with randomized workloads (estimation tests at 65, 75, 85 and 95% of the maximal power output, and production tests: subjects have to use the ETL values which were collected for each power during the estimation test in order to manually product the corresponding workload). The intraclass correlation coefficient for the power output between estimation and production tests is good for exercises at 75, 85 and 95% MAP (0.81, 0.85 and 0.96, respectively). Moreover, mean differences both for power output and cardiorespiratory data were not significantly different between estimation and production tests for exercises at 85 and 95% MAP. Consequently, the validity to prescribe an exercise intensity from the ETL scale is attested in these athletes particularly for high exercise intensities on cycloergometer.

Keywords

Perceived exertion Prescription Validity Cycloergometer 

Notes

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abbiss CR, Peiffer JJ (2010) The influence of afferent feedback, perceived exertion and effort on endurance performance. J Appl Physiol 108:460–461PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Billat V (2001) Interval training for perfomance: a scientific and empirical practice Special recommendations for middle- and long-distance running. Part I: aerobic interval training. Sports Med 31:13–31PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bishop D (2003) Warm Up II Performance changes following active warm up and how to structure the warm up. Sports Med 33:483–498PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Borg GV (1970) Perceived exertion as an indicator of somatic stress. Scand J Rehabil Med 2:92–98PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Borg GA (1973) Perceived exertion: a note on “history” and methods. Med Sci Sports 5:90–93PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cafarelli E (1982) Peripheral contributions to the perception of effort. Med Sci Sports Exerc 14:382–389PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Ceci R, Hassmen P (1991) Self-monitored exercise at three different RPE intensities in treadmill vs field running. Med Sci Sports Exerc 23:732–738PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen MJ, Fan X, Moe ST (2002) Criterion-related validity of the Borg ratings of perceived exertion scale in healthy individuals: a meta-analysis. J Sports Sci 20:873–899PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cooke CB (2001) Maximal oxygen uptake, economy and efficiency. In: Eston RG, Reilly T (eds) Kinanthropometry and exercise physiology laboratory manual: tests, procedures and data. Exercise physiology, vol 2, 2nd edn. Routledge, London, pp 161–191Google Scholar
  10. Coquart JBJ, Garcin M (2007) Validity and reliability of perceptually-based scales during exhausting runs in trained male runners. Percept Mot Skills 104:254–266PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coquart JBJ, Legrand R, Robin S, Duhamel A, Matran R, Garcin M (2009) Influence of successive bouts of fatiguing exercise on perceptual and physiological markers during an incremental exercise test. Pychophysiology 46:209–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dishman RK (1994) Prescribing exercise intensity for healthy adults using perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc 26:1087–1094PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Dunbar CC, Robertson RJ, Baun R, Blandin MF, Metz K, Burdett R, Goss FL (1992) The validity of regulating exercise intensity by ratings of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc 24:94–99PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Dunbar CC, Goris C, Michielli DW, Kalinski MI (1994) Accuracy and reproducibility of an exercise prescription based on Ratings of Perceived Exertion for treadmill and cycle ergometer exercise. Percept Mot Skills 78(3Pt2):1335–1344PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Eston RG, Thompson M (1997) Use of ratings of perceived exertion for predicting maximal work rate and prescribing exercise intensity in patients taking atenolol. Br J Sports Med 31:114–119PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eston RG, Davies L, Williams JG (1987) Use of perceived effort ratings to control exercise intensity in young healthy adults. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 56:222–224PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Faulkner J, Parfitt G, Eston R (2007) Prediction of maximal oxygen uptake from the ratings of perceived exertion and heart rate during a perceptually-regulated sub-maximal exercise test in active and sedentary participants. Eur J Appl Physiol 101:397–407PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fleiss JL (1986) Design and analysis of clinical experiments. Wiley, New York, pp 1–32Google Scholar
  19. Garcin M, Billat V (2001) Perceived exertion scales attest to both intensity and exercise duration. Percept Mot Skills 93:661–671PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Garcin M, Vautier JF, Vandewalle H, Monod H (1998) Ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) as an index of aerobic endurance during local and general exercises. Ergonomics 41:1105–1114PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Garcin M, Vandewalle H, Monod H (1999) A new rating scale of perceived exertion based on subjective estimation of exhaustion time. Int J Sports Med 20:40–43PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Garcin M, Mille-Hamard L, Devillers S, Dufour S, Delattre E, Billat V (2003) Influence of the type of training sport practised on psychological and physiological parameters during exhausting endurance exercises. Percept Mot Skills 97(3Pt2):1150–1162PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Garcin M, Mille-Hamard L, Billat V (2004) Influence of aerobic fitness level on measured and estimated perceived exertion during exhausting runs. Int J Sports Med 25:270–277PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Garcin M, Fleury A, Mille-Hamard L, Billat V (2005) Sex-related differences in ratings of perceived exertion and estimated time limit. Int J Sports Med 26:675–681PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Garcin M, Coquart JBJ, Robin S, Matran R (2011) Prediction of time to exhaustion in competitive cyclists from a perceptually-based scale. J Strength Cond Res 25:1393–1399PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Glass SC, Knowlton RG, Becque MD (1992) Accuracy of RPE from graded exercise to establish exercise training intensity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 24(11):1303–1307PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Marcora S (2010a) Counterpoint: afferent feedback from fatigued locomotor muscles is not an important determinant of endurance exercise performance. J Appl Physiol 108:454–456 discussion 456–457PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Marcora S (2010b) Last Word on Point:Counterpoint: afferent feedback from fatigued locomotor muscles is not an important determinant of endurance exercise performance. J Appl Physiol 108:470 (letter to the editor)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Marcora SM, Bosio A, de Morree HM (2008) Locomotor muscle fatigue increases cardiorespiratory responses and reduces performance during intense cycling exercise independently from metabolic stress. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 294:R874–R883PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Marriott HE, Lamb KL (1996) The use of ratings of perceived exertion for regulating exercise levels in rowing ergometry. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 72:267–271PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Noakes TD, St Clair Gibon A, Lambert EV (2005) From catastrophe to complexity: a novel model of integrative central neural regulation of effort and fatigue during exercise in humans: summary and conclusions. Br J Sports Med 39:120–124PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Noble BJ, Metz KF, Pandolf KB, Bell CW, Cafarelli E, Sime WE (1973) Perceived exertion during walking and running. II. Med Sci Sports 5:116–120PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Pandolf KB (1983) Advances in the study and application of perceived exertion. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 11:118–158PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rejeski WJ (1981) The perception of exertion: a social psychophysiological integration. J Sport Psychol 4:305–320Google Scholar
  35. Robertson RJ (1982) Central signals of perceived exertion during dynamic exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 14:390–396PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Robertson RJ (2004) The OMNI picture system of perceived exertion. In: Robertson RJ (ed) Perceived exertion for practitioners; ratings effort with the OMNI picture system. Human Kinetics, Champaign, pp 9–20Google Scholar
  37. Robertson RJ, Noble BJ (1997) Perception of physical exertion: methods, mediators, and applications. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 25:407–452PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Robertson RJ, Goss FL, Bell JA, Dixon CB, Gallagher KI, Lagally KM, Timmer JM, Abt KL, Gallagher JD, Thompkins T (2002) Self-regulated cycling using the Children’s OMNI Scale of Perceived Exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc 34:1168–1175PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Robertson RJ, Goss FL, Nagle E, Andreacci J, Dube J, Rutkowski J, Crawford K (2009) Early phase overshoot strategy of children when self-regulating intermittent walking and running intensity using target RPE International Symposium of Pediatric Work Physiology, XXVth edn. Le Touquet, Paris Plage, p 73Google Scholar
  40. Skinner JS, Hutsler R, Bergteinova V, Buskirk ER (1973) The validity and reliability of a rating scale of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports 5:94–96PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Smutok MA, Skrinar GS, Pandolf KB (1980) Exercise intensity: subjective regulation by perceived exertion. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 61:569–574PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. St Clair Gibson A, Noakes TD (2004) Evidence for complex system integration and dynamic neural regulation of skeletal muscle recruitment during exercise in humans. Br J Sports Med 38:797–806PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Thomas TR, Ziogas G, Smith T, Smith T, Zhang Q, Londeree BR (1995) Physiological and perceived exertion responses to six modes of submaximal exercise. Res Q Exerc Sport 66:239–246PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Tucker R (2009) The anticipatory regulation of performance: the physiological basis for pacing strategies and the development of a perception-based model for exercise performance. Br J Sports Med 43:392–400PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ueda T, Kurokawa T (1995) Relationships between perceived exertion and physiological variables during swimming. Int J Sports Med 16:385–389PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ulmer HV (1996) Concept of an extracellular regulation of muscular metabolic rate during heavy exercise in humans by psychophysiological feedback. Experientia 52:416–420PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Watt B, Grove R (1993) Perceived exertion. Antecedents and applications. Sports Med 15:225–241PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Weiser PC, Wojciechowicz V, Funck A, Robertson RJ (2007) Perceived effort step-up procedure for self-regulating stationary cycle exercise intensity by patients with cardiovascular disease. Percept Mot Skills 104:236–253PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Garcin
    • 1
    • 2
    • 6
    Email author
  • J. Coquart
    • 3
  • J. Salleron
    • 4
  • N. Voy
    • 1
    • 2
  • R. Matran
    • 1
    • 5
  1. 1.Univ Lille Nord de FranceLilleFrance
  2. 2.UDSLEA4488RonchinFrance
  3. 3.EA 3832Faculty of Sports Sciences and Physical Education, Rouen UniversityMont Saint AignanFrance
  4. 4.Department of BiostatisticCHU LilleLilleFrance
  5. 5.Service of Respiratory Functional ExplorationsCHU LilleLilleFrance
  6. 6.EA4488Faculty of Sports Sciences and Physical EducationRonchinFrance

Personalised recommendations