Advertisement

European Journal of Applied Physiology

, Volume 112, Issue 5, pp 1709–1715 | Cite as

The energetics of ultra-endurance running

  • Stefano LazzerEmail author
  • Desy Salvadego
  • Enrico Rejc
  • Antonio Buglione
  • Guglielmo Antonutto
  • Pietro Enrico di Prampero
Original Article

Abstract

Our objective was to determine the effects of long-lasting endurance events on the energy cost of running (C r), and the role of maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max), its fractional utilisation (F) and C r in determining the performance. Ten healthy runners (age range 26–59 years) participated in an ultra-endurance competition consisting of three running laps of 22, 48 and 20 km on three consecutive days in the North–East of Italy. Anthropometric characteristics and VO2max by a graded exercise test on a treadmill were determined 5 days before and 5 days after the competition. In addition, C r was determined on a treadmill before and after each running lap. Heart rate (HR) was recorded throughout the three laps. Results revealed that mean C r of the individual laps did not increase significantly with lap number (P = 0.200), thus ruling out any chronic lap effect. Even so, however, at the end of lap 3, C r was 18.0% (P < 0.001) greater than before lap 1. In addition, a statistically significant acute lap effect on C r was observed at the end of the second and third laps (by 11.4 and 7.2%, respectively). The main factors determining performance were VO2max, F, as estimated from the average HR, and the average C r-mean throughout the three laps; the grand average speed over the three laps being described by v end-mean = F × VO2max × C r-mean −1 . We concluded that (1) the substantial increase of C r-mean during the competition yields to marked worsening of the performance, and (2) the three variables F, VO2max and C r-mean combined as described above explaining 87% of the total competition time variance.

Keywords

Maximal oxygen uptake Energy cost Ultramarathon Gas exchange threshold Efficiency 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the athletes for their kind collaboration, to Mr A. Iossa, Mr P. Tedeschi, and the A.S.D. Triathlon Team – Pordenone, Italy, for their qualified assistance during the study. We are grateful to Dr. M. Isola for his advises for statistical analyses. The financial support of the Lions Club, Udine-Duomo, Italy, is gratefully acknowledged.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Beaver WL, Wasserman K, Whipp BJ (1986) A new method for detecting anaerobic threshold by gas exchange. J Appl Physiol 60:2020–2027PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Beneke R, Hutler M (2005) The effect of training on running economy, performance in recreational athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc 37(10):1794–1799PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Billat V, Demarle A, Paiva M, Koralsztein JP (2002) Effect of training on the physiological factors of performance in elite marathon runners (males and females). Int J Sports Med 23(5):336–341PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brueckner JC, Atchou G, Capelli C, Duvallet A, Barrault D, Jousselin E, Rieu M, di Prampero PE (1991) The energy cost of running increases with the distance covered. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 62(6):385–389PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Conley DL, Krahenbuhl GS (1980) Running economy and distance running performance of highly trained athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc 12(5):357–360PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjostrom M, Bauman AE, Booth ML, Ainsworth BE, Pratt M, Ekelund U, Yngve A, Sallis JF, Oja P (2003) International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 35(8):1381–1395PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Daniels JT (1985) A physiologist’s view of running economy. Med Sci Sports Exerc 17(3):332–338PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Davies CT, Thompson MW (1986) Physiological responses to prolonged exercise in ultramarathon athlete. J Appl Physiol 61(2):611–617PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. di Prampero PE (2003) Factors limiting maximal performance in humans. Eur J Appl Physiol 90(3-4):420–429PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. di Prampero PE, Atchou G, Brueckner JC, Moia C (1986) The energetics of endurance running. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 55(3):259–266PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. di Prampero PE, Capelli C, Pagliaro P, Antonutto G, Girardis M, Zamparo P, Soule RG (1993) Energetics of best performances in middle-distance running. J Appl Physiol 74(5):2318–2324PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Holloszy JO, Coyle EF (1984) Adaptations of skeletal muscle to endurance exercise and their metabolic consequences. J Appl Physiol 56(4):831–838PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Jones AM (1998) A five year physiological case study of an Olympic runner. Br J Sports Med 32(1):39–43PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jones AM, Doust JH (1996) A 1% treadmill grade most accurately reflects the energetic cost of outdoor running. J Sports Sci 14(4):321–327PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Joyner MJ (1991) Modeling: optimal marathon performance on the basis of physiological factors. J Appl Physiol 70(2):683–687PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Laursen PB, Rhodes EC (2001) Factors affecting performance in an ultra endurance triathlon. Sports Med 31(3):195–209PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lukaski HC, Bolonchuk WW, Hall CB, Siders WA (1986) Validation of tetrapolar bioelectrical impedance method to assess human body composition. J Appl Physiol 60(4):1327–1332PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Maughan RJ, Leiper JB (1983) Aerobic capacity and fractional utilisation of aerobic capacity in elite and non-elite male and female marathon runners. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 52(1):80–87PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Millet GY, Morin JB, Degache F, Edouard P, Feasson L, Verney J, Oullion R (2009) Running from Paris to Beijing: biomechanical and physiological consequences. Eur J Appl Physiol 107(6):731–738PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sjodin B, Svedenhag J (1985) Applied physiology of marathon running. Sports Med 2(2):83–99PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stefano Lazzer
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Desy Salvadego
    • 1
    • 2
  • Enrico Rejc
    • 1
    • 2
  • Antonio Buglione
    • 3
    • 4
  • Guglielmo Antonutto
    • 1
    • 2
  • Pietro Enrico di Prampero
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Medical and Biological SciencesUniversity of UdineUdineItaly
  2. 2.School of Sport Sciences, University of UdineUdineItaly
  3. 3.Human Performance Training and Lab “Carmelo Bosco”University Tor VergataRomeItaly
  4. 4.School of Sport and Exercise Sciences, University Tor VergataRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations