European Journal of Applied Physiology

, Volume 111, Issue 8, pp 1879–1887 | Cite as

Reliability and accuracy of segmental bioelectrical impedance analysis for assessing muscle and fat mass in older Europeans: a comparison with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry

  • Katharina Mally
  • Jens Trentmann
  • Martin Heller
  • Manuela Dittmar
Original Article

Abstract

Segmental determination of muscle and fat mass (MM, FM) attains growing importance for judging effects of training and malnutrition in older people. This study evaluated the reliability and accuracy of segmental bioelectrical impedance analysis (sBIA) for use in older people. In 72 (40 men, 32 women) healthy elderly (mean age 69.0 ± 4.8 years), the MM and FM of right and left arm (RA, LA), right and left leg (RL, LL), and trunk were determined by sBIA (BC-418-MA, Tanita) and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) as a reference method. The sBIA provided in both sexes reliable values for limb and truncal MM and FM, except for MM of RL in women. The accuracy of sBIA displayed sex-specific bias. For MM, accurate values were noted for men’s trunk and women’s limbs (except LA). By contrast, MM was significantly underestimated in men’s limbs by 6–18% and overestimated in women’s LA (13%) and trunk (14%). Estimates of FM were accurate for men’s arms as well as women’s legs and trunk. However, FM was significantly overestimated in men’s legs (34–37%) and trunk (60%), but underestimated in women’s arms (27–35%). The proportional deviations of sBIA estimates from DXA values for limbs and trunk were significantly related to the respective MM or FM. The sBIA tends to underestimate MM in men and to overestimate in women. The reverse occurs for FM. The actual equations of the Tanita device may not completely represent the European older population and should be partly revised.

Keywords

Muscle mass Fat mass Segmental bioelectrical Impedance analysis Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry Limbs Trunk 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are greatly indebted to the participants for taking part in this study. They wish to thank Jutta Krause, Saedeeh Abdan and Claudia Vorderbrügge, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital of Schleswig–Holstein, Campus Kiel, for technical assistance in DXA measurements.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Aaron R, Esper GJ, Shiffman CA, Bradonjic K, Lee KS, Rutkove SB (2006) Effects of age on muscle as measured by electrical impedance myography. Physiol Meas 27:953–959PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307–310PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bracco D, Thiébaud D, Chioléro RL, Landry M, Burckhardt P, Schutz Y (1996) Segmental body composition assessed by bioelectrical impedance analysis and DEXA in humans. J Appl Physiol 81:2580–2587PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Cha K, Shin S, Shon C, Choi S, Wilmore DW (1997) Evaluation of segmental bioelectrical impedance analysis (SBIA) for measuring muscle distribution. J ICHPER SD-Asia 1:11–14Google Scholar
  5. Demura S, Sato S, Kitabayashi T (2004) Percentage of total body fat as estimated by three automatic bioelectrical impedance analyzers. J Physiol Anthropol Appl Human Sci 23:93–99PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Demura S, Sato S, Kitabayashi T (2005) Estimation accuracy of percent total body fat and percent segmental fat measured by single-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis with 8 electrodes: the effect of difference in adiposity. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 45:68–76PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Després JP, Lemieux I (2006) Abdominal obesity and metabolic syndrome. Nature 444:881–887PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Drewnowski A, Evans WJ (2001) Nutrition, physical activity, and quality of life in older adults: summary. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 56(2):89–94PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gallagher D, Visser M, DeMeersman RE, Sepúlveda D, Baumgartner RN, Pierson RN, Harris T, Heymsfield SB (1997) Appendicular skeletal muscle mass: effects of age, gender, and ethnicity. J Appl Physiol 83:229–239PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Graham AC, Willett WC, Rotnitzky A, Manson AE (1995) Weight gain as a risk factor for clinical diabetes mellitus in women. Ann Intern Med 122:481–486Google Scholar
  11. Haapala I, Hirvonen A, Niskanen L, Uusitupa M, Kröger H, Alhava E, Nissinen A (2002) Anthropometry, bioelectrical impedance and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the assessment of body composition in elderly Finnish women. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 22:383–391PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hansen RD, Raja C, Aslani A, Smith RC, Allen BJ (1999) Determination of skeletal muscle and fat-free mass by nuclear and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry methods in men and women aged 51–84 years. Am J Clin Nutr 70:228–233PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Knussmann R (1988) Somatometrie. In: Knussmann R (ed) Anthropologie. Handbuch der vergleichenden Biologie des Menschen. Vol. 1: Wesen und Methoden der Anthropologie. Part 1. Wissenschaftstheorie, Geschichte, morphologische Methoden. Fischer, Stuttgart, New York, pp 232–285Google Scholar
  14. Kriemler S, Puder J, Zahner L, Roth R, Braun-Fahrländer C, Bedogni G (2009) Cross-validation of bioelectrical impedance analysis for the assessment of body composition in a representative sample of 6- to 13-year-old children. Eur J Clin Nutr 63:619–626PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Malavolti M, Mussi C, Poli M, Fantuzzi AL, Salvioli G, Battistini N, Bedogni G (2003) Cross-calibration of eight-polar bioelectrical impedance analysis versus dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for the assessment of total and appendicular body composition in healthy subjects aged 21–82 years. Ann Hum Biol 30:380–391PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Neovius M, Hemmingsson E, Freyschuss B, Uddén J (2006) Bioelectrical impedance underestimates total and truncal fatness in abdominally obese women. Obesity 14:1731–1738PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Organ LW, Bradham GB, Gore DT, Lozier SL (1994) Segmental bioelectrical impedance analysis: theory and application of a new technique. J Appl Physiol 77:98–112PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Pietrobelli A, Morini P, Battistini N, Chiumello G, Nuñez C, Heymsfield SB (1998) Appendicular skeletal muscle mass: prediction from multiple frequency segmental bioimpedance analysis. Eur J Clin Nutr 52:507–511PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pietrobelli A, Rubiano F, St-Onge M-P, Heymsfield SB (2004) New bioimpedance analysis system: improved phenotyping with whole-body analysis. Eur J Clin Nutr 58:1479–1484PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rance M, Morio B, Courteix D, Bedu M, van Praagh E, Duché P (2006) Lower-limb and whole-body tissue composition assessment in healthy active older women. Ann Hum Biol 33:89–99PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Reed RL, Pearlmutter L, Yochum K, Meredith KE, Mooradian AD (1991) The relationship between muscle mass and muscle strength in the elderly. J Am Geriatr Soc 39:555–561PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Sato S, Demura S, Kitabayashi T, Noguchi T (2007) Segmental body composition assessment for obese Japanese adults by single-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis with 8-point contact electrodes. J Physiol Anthropol 26:533–540PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Snead DB, Birge SJ, Kohrt WM (1993) Age related differences in body composition by hydrodensitometry and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. J Appl Physiol 74:770–775PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Tagliabue A, Andreoli A, Commelli M, Bertoli S, Testolin G, Oriani G, de Lorenzo A (2001) Prediction of lean body mass from multifrequency segmental impedance: influence of adiposity. Acta Diabetol 38:93–97PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. WHO (2000) Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO Consultation. WHO Technical Report Series 894. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  26. Wu CH, Heshka S, Wang J, Pierson NJ, Heymsfield SB, Laferrère B, Wang Z, Albu JB, Pi-Sunyer X, Gallagher D (2007) Truncal fat in relation to total body fat; influence of age, sex, ethnicity and fatness. Int J Obes 31:1384–1391CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katharina Mally
    • 1
  • Jens Trentmann
    • 2
  • Martin Heller
    • 2
  • Manuela Dittmar
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Human Biology, Zoological InstituteChristian-Albrechts-University KielKielGermany
  2. 2.Department of Diagnostic RadiologyUniversity Hospital Schleswig–Holstein Campus KielKielGermany

Personalised recommendations