Advertisement

European Journal of Applied Physiology

, Volume 111, Issue 7, pp 1533–1539 | Cite as

Bilateral deficit phenomenon and the role of antagonist muscle activity during maximal isometric knee extensions in young, athletic men

  • Usha Kuruganti
  • Tiernan Murphy
  • Trevor Pardy
Short Communication

Abstract

The bilateral limb deficit (BLD) phenomenon is the difference in maximal or near maximal force generating capacity of muscles when they are contracted alone or in combination with the contralateral muscles. A deficit occurs when the summed unilateral force is greater than the bilateral force. The BLD has been observed by a number of researchers in both upper and lower limbs, in isometric and in dynamic contractions. The underlying cause of the deficit remains unknown. One possible explanation is that the deficit occurs due to differences in antagonist muscle coactivation between unilateral and bilateral contractions. In order to examine this potential cause, this research examined torque and electromyography (EMG) during isometric bilateral and unilateral knee extension under three different joint angles (0°, 45°, and 90°) in a group of young, athletic males (n = 10, mean age of 24.5 ± 2.7 years, height = 180 ± 4.71 cm, and weight = 82.5 ± 17.8 kg). Torque and EMG data were collected from three superficial muscles of the quadriceps (vastus lateralis, vastus medialis, and rectus femoris) as well as two muscles of the antagonist hamstrings (biceps femoris and semitendinosus) during maximal isometric knee extensions. The BLD was only observed during the 45° contractions. Further examination of the data found that the antagonist muscle activity was similar during both bilateral and unilateral contractions suggesting that the deficit is not due to alterations in antagonist muscle patterns between unilateral and bilateral contractions.

Keywords

Bilateral limb deficit Isometric knee extension Electromyography Torque Antagonist muscle 

References

  1. Archontides C, Fazey JA (1993) Inter-limb interactions and constraints in the expression of maximum force: a review, some implications and suggested underlying mechanisms. J Sports Sci 11:145–158PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Farina D, Merletti R, Enoka R (2004) The extraction of neural strategies from the surface EMG. J Appl Physiol 96:1486–1495PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Henry FM, Smith LE (1961) Simultaneous vs separate bilateral muscular contractions in relation to neural overflow theory and neuromotor specificity. Res Q Exerc Sport 32:42–46Google Scholar
  4. Hernandez JP, Nelson-White NL, Franke WD, McLean SP (2003) Bilateral index expressions and iEMG activity in older versus younger adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 58:M536–M541Google Scholar
  5. Howard JD, Enoka RM (1991) Maximum bilateral contractions are modified by neurally mediated interlimb effects. J Appl Physiol 70:306–316PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Jakobi J, Cafarelli E (1998) Neuromuscular drive and force production are not altered during bilateral contractions. J Appl Physiol 84:200–206PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Jakobi J, Chilibeck P (2001) Bilateral and unilateral contractions: possible differences in maximal voluntary force. Can J Appl Physiol 26:12–33PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kawakami Y, Sale DG, MacDougall JD, Moroz JR (1998) Bilateral deficit in plantar flexion: relation to knee joint position, muscle activation, and reflex excitability. Eur J Appl Physiol 77:212–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Koh T, Grabiner M, Clough C (1993) Bilateral deficit is larger for step than for ramp isometric contractions. J Appl Physiol 74:1200–1205PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Kubo K, Tsunoda N, Kanehisa H, Fukunaga T (2004) Activation of agonist and antagonist muscles at different joint angles during maximal isometric efforts. Eur J Appl Physiol 91:349–352PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kuruganti U, Murphy T (2008) Bilateral deficit expressions and myoelectric signal activity during submaximal and maximal isometric knee extensions in young, athletic males. Eur J Appl Physiol 102:721–726PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lieber RL, Loren GJ, Fridén J (1994) In vivo measurement of human wrist extensor muscle sarcomere length changes. J Neurophysiol 71:874–881PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. McLean SP, Vint PF, Stember AJ (2006) Submaximal expression of the bilateral deficit. Res Q Exerc Sport 77:340–350PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Oda S, Moritani T (1994) Maximal isometric force and neural activity during bilateral and unilateral elbow flexion in humans. Eur J Appl Physiol 69:240–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ohtsuki T (1981) Inhibition of individual fingers during grip strength exertion. Ergonomics 24:21–36PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ohtsuki T (1983) Decrease in human voluntary isometric arm strength induced by simultaneous bilateral exertion. Behav Brain Res 7:165–178PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ohtsuki T (1994) Changes in strength, speed and reaction time induced by simultaneous bilateral muscular activity. In: Swinnen SP, Heurer H, Massion J, Casaer P (eds) Interlimb coordination: neural dynamic and cognitive constraints. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 259–274Google Scholar
  18. Owings T, Grabiner M (1998) Normally aging older adults demonstrate the bilateral deficit during ramp and hold contractions. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 53A:B425–B429Google Scholar
  19. Rube N, Secher NH (1990) Effect of training on central factors in fatigue following two-and one-leg static exercise in man. Acta Physiol Scand 141:87–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schantz PG, Moritanti T, Karlson E, Johansson E, Lundh A (1989) Maximal voluntary force of bilateral and unilateral leg extension. Acta Physiol Scand 136:185–192PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sexsmith JR, Woods BA (1997) Effects of knee angle and randomization on dynamic knee extension bilateral ratios. Med Sci Sports Exerc 29:S39Google Scholar
  22. Steger J, Denoth J (1996) Das Bilaterale Defizit: analysen anhand von Kraft-,EMG-und EEG-Messungen. Schweizerische-Zeitschrift-fuer-Medizin-und-Tramatologie/Revue-suisse-pour-medecine-et-traumatologie-(Bern) 44:155–159Google Scholar
  23. Van Soest AJ, Roebroeck ME, Bobbert JF, Huijing PA, Van Ingen Schenau GJ (1985) A comparison of one-legged and two-legged countermovement jumps. Med Sci Sports Exerc 17:635–639PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Vandervoort AA, Sale DG, Moroz JR (1984) Comparison of motor unit activation during unilateral and bilateral leg extension. J Appl Physiol 56:46–51PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of KinesiologyUniversity of New BrunswickFrederictonCanada

Personalised recommendations