Advertisement

European Journal of Applied Physiology

, Volume 111, Issue 6, pp 1157–1166 | Cite as

Cardiorespiratory, neuromuscular and kinematic responses to stationary running performed in water and on dry land

  • Cristine Lima AlbertonEmail author
  • Eduardo Lusa Cadore
  • Stephanie Santana Pinto
  • Marcus Peikriszwili Tartaruga
  • Eduardo Marczwski da Silva
  • Luiz Fernando Martins Kruel
Original Article

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze the cardiorespiratory, neuromuscular and kinematic responses obtained during the stationary running in aquatic and dry land environments. Twelve women took part in the experimental protocol. Stationary running was performed for 4 min at three submaximal cadences and for 15 s at maximal velocity, with the collection of kinematic (peak hip angular velocity (AV)), cardiorespiratory (oxygen uptake (VO2)) and neuromuscular variables (electromyographic (EMG) signal from the rectus femoris (RF), vastus lateralis (VL), semitendinosus (ST) and short head of the biceps femoris (BF) muscles) in land-based and water-based test protocols. Factorial ANOVA was used, with an alpha level of 0.05. AV was significantly higher when the exercise was performed on land, and became significantly higher as the execution cadence increased. Similarly, VO2 was significantly higher in the land-based exercise and rose as cadence increased. With the increase in the submaximal execution cadences, there was no corresponding increase in the EMG signal from the VL, BF, RF and ST muscles in either environment, though such a significantly increase was seen between the submaximal cadences and the maximal velocity. Dry land presented significantly greater EMG signal responses for all muscles at the submaximal cadences, except for the ST muscle. However, at the maximal velocity, all the analyzed muscle groups showed similar responses in both environments. In summary, for both environments, cardiorespiratory responses can be maximized by increasing the submaximal cadences, while neuromuscular responses are only optimized by using maximal velocity.

Keywords

Aquatic exercise Electromyography Heart rate Oxygen uptake Angular velocity 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by CAPES and CNPq. The authors wish to thank MIOTEC and INBRAMED companies for their invaluable contribution to this study.

Conflict of interest

We wish to confirm that there are no known conflicts of interest associated with this publication and there has been no significant financial support for this work that could have influenced its outcome.

References

  1. Alberton CL, Coertjens M, Figueiredo PAP, Kruel LFM (2005) Behavior of oxygen uptake in water exercises performed at different cadences in and out of water. Med Sci Sports Exerc 37(5):S103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alberton CL, Olkoski MM, Becker ME, Pinto SS, Kruel LFM (2007a) Cardiorespiratory responses of post-menopause women to different hydrogymnastic exercises. Int J Aquat Res Educ 1:363–372Google Scholar
  3. Alberton CL, Silva EM, Tartaruga MP, Cadore EL, Becker ME, Brentano MA, Kruel LFM (2007b) Electromiographic signal reliability analysis during isometric and dynamic actions performed in different environments. Rev Bras Biomec 8:81–88 (In Portuguese)Google Scholar
  4. Alberton CL, Silva EM, Cadore EL, Coertjens M, Beyer PO, Marocco LF, Kruel LFM (2008) Electromyographic responses induced by superficial electrodes isolation and by immersion. Rev Port Cienc Desp 8(3):330–336 (In Portuguese)Google Scholar
  5. Alberton CL, Tartaruga MP, Pinto SS, Cadore EL, Silva EM, Kruel LFM (2009) Cardiorespiratory responses to stationary running at different cadences in water and on land. J Sports Med Phys Fit 49:142–151Google Scholar
  6. Alexander R (1977) Mechanics and energetic of animal locomotion. In: Alexander R, Goldspink G (eds) Swimming. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 222–248Google Scholar
  7. Black GL, Müller E, Tartaruga MP, Brentano MA, Figueiredo PAP, Kruel LFM (2006) Electromyography in aquatic exercise with different resistances and velocities. In: Vilas-Boas JP, Alves F, Marques AS (eds) Xth international symposium biomechanics and medicine in swimming. Port J Sport Sci 6(Suppl. 1):75Google Scholar
  8. Carvalho RGS, Amorim CF, Perácio LHR, Coelho HF, Vieira AC, Karl Menzel HJ, Szmuchrowski LA (2010) Analysis of various conditions in order to measure electromyography of isometric contractions in water and on air. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 20:988–993. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2009.12.002 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cassady SL, Nielsen DH (1992) Cardiorespiratory responses of healthy subjects to calisthenics performed on land versus in water. Phys Ther 75:532–5382Google Scholar
  10. Cooke CB (1996) Metabolic rate and energy balance. In: Eston R, Reilly T (eds) Kinanthropometry and exercise physiology laboratory manual. E & FN Spon, London, pp 175–195Google Scholar
  11. DeLuca CJ (1997) The use of surface electromyography in biomechanics. J Appl Biomec 13:135–163Google Scholar
  12. Figueiredo PAP, Borges NG Jr, Tartaruga LAP, Kruel LFM (2006) Methodology of isolate the system to collect EMG signal in the water. Aquat Fit Res J 3(1):32Google Scholar
  13. Hall J, McDonald IA, Maddison PJ, O’Hare JP (1998) Cardiorespiratory responses to underwater treadmill walking in healthy females. Eur J Appl Physiol 77:278–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Harrisson RA, Hillman M, Bulstrode S (1992) Loading of the lower limb when walking partially immersed: implications for clinical practice. Physiotherapy 78:164–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Heithold K, Glass SC (2002) Variations in the heart rate and perception of effort during land and water aerobics in older women. J Exerc Physiol 5(4):22–28Google Scholar
  16. Hof AL, Elzinga H, Grimmius W, Halbertsma JPK (2002) Speed dependence of averaged EMG profiles in walking. Gait Posture 16:78–86PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Howley ET, Basset DR Jr, Welch HG (1995) Criteria for maximal oxygen uptake: review and commentary. Med Sci Sports Exerc 27:1292–1301PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Hug F, Decherchi P, Narqueste T, Jammes Y (2004) EMG versus oxygen uptake during cycling exercise in trained and untrained subjects. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 14:187–195PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kaneda K, Sato D, Wakabayashi H, Nomura T (2009) EMG activity of hip and trunk muscles during deep-water running. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 19:1064–1070PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kelly BT, Roskin LA, Kirkendall DT, Speer KP (2000) Shoulder muscle activation during aquatic and dry land exercises in nonimpaired subjects. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 30(4):204–210PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. King GA, McLaughlin JE, Howley ET, Basset DR Jr, Ainsworth BE (1999) Validation of Aerosport KB1-C portable metabolic system. Int J Sports Med 20:304–308PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Knutson LM, Soderberg GL, Ballantyne BT, Clarke WR (1994) A study of various normalization procedures for within day electromyographic data. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 4(1):47–59PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kruel LFM (1994) Hydrostatic weight and heart rate in subjects immersed at different water depths. Unpublished master dissertation. Santa Maria. Federal University of Santa Maria, Brazil (In Portuguese)Google Scholar
  24. Kruel LFM (2000) Physiological and biomechanical alterations in individuals practicing water exercises inside and outside of the water. Unpublished doctoral thesis. Santa Maria. Federal University of Santa Maria, Brazil (In Portuguese)Google Scholar
  25. Kruel LFM, Tartaruga LAP, Tartaruga MP, Larronda ACC, Loss JF (2002) Kinematic analysis of middle-distance runners during treadmill running in deep water running. In: XX International symposium on biomechanics in sports. Cáceres, Spain, pp 88–91Google Scholar
  26. Masumoto K, Takasugi S, Hotta N, Fujishima K, Iwamoto Y (2004) Electromyographic analysis of walking in water in healthy humans. J Physiol Anthropol Appl Human Sci 23(4):119–127PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Masumoto K, Tomoki S, Hotta N, Fujishima K (2008) Muscle activation, cardiorespiratory response, and rating of perceived exertion in older subjects while walking in water and on dry land. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 18(4):581–590PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Masumoto K, Delion D, Mercer JA (2009) Insight into muscle activity during deep water running. Med Sci Sports Exerc 41(10):1958–1964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McIntosh BR, Neptune RR, Horton JF (2000) Cadence, power, and muscle activation in cycle ergometry. Med Sci Sports Exerc 32(7):1281–1287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Miyoshi T, Shirota T, Yamamoto S, Nakazawa K, Akai M (2004) Effect of the walking speed to the lower limb joint angular displacements, joint moments and ground reaction forces during walking in water. Disabil Rehabil 26(12):724–732PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Miyoshi T, Nakazawa K, Tanizaki M, Sato T, Akai M (2006) Altered activation pattern in synergistic ankle plantarflexor muscles in a reduced-gravity environment. Gait Posture 24:94–99PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Müller ESM, Black GL, Figueiredo PAP, Kruel LFM, Hanish C, Appel HJ (2005) Electromyographic comparison of abdominal exercises in and out of water. Rev Port Cienc Desp 5(3):255–265 (In Portuguese)Google Scholar
  33. Pinto SS, Liedtke GV, Alberton CL, da Silva EM, Cadore EL, Kruel LFM (2010) Electromyographic signal and force comparisons during maximal voluntary isometric contraction in water and on dry land. Eur J Appl Physiol 110:1075–1082. doi: 10.1007/s00421-010-1598-0 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rainoldi A, Cescon C, Bottin A, Casale R, Caruso I (2004) Surface EMG alterations induced by underwater recording. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 14:325–331PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Shono T, Fujishima K, Hotta N, Ogaki T, Ueda T, Otoki K, Teramoto K, Shimizu T (2000) Physiological responses and RPE during underwater treadmill walking in women of middle and advanced age. J Physiol Anthropol Appl Human Sci 19(4):195–200PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shono T, Masumoto K, Fujishima K, Hotta N, Ogaki T, Adachi T (2007) Gait patterns and muscle activity in the lower extremities of elderly women during underwater treadmill walking against water flow. J Physiol Anthropol 26(6):579–586PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cristine Lima Alberton
    • 1
    Email author
  • Eduardo Lusa Cadore
    • 1
  • Stephanie Santana Pinto
    • 1
  • Marcus Peikriszwili Tartaruga
    • 1
  • Eduardo Marczwski da Silva
    • 1
  • Luiz Fernando Martins Kruel
    • 1
  1. 1.Exercise Research Laboratory, room 208, Physical Education SchoolFederal University of Rio Grande do SulPorto AlegreBrazil

Personalised recommendations