Progression of volume load and muscular adaptation during resistance exercise
- 1.1k Downloads
Volume load (VL) is suggested to influence the adaptation of muscle to resistance exercise (RE). We sought to examine the independent association between total VL and hypertrophy and strength following a progressive RE protocol of equated sets and intensity. Total VL was calculated in 83 subjects (n = 43 males, n = 40 females; age = 25.12 ± 5.5 years) who participated in unilateral arm RE for 12 weeks. Subjects were tested for biceps muscle volume (MRI of the upper arm), isometric maximal voluntary contraction (MVC), and dynamic biceps strength (1RM), at baseline and following RE. Linear regression analysis revealed that sex was a significant predictor of hypertrophy (β = 0.06; p = 0.01) and strength (β = 0.14; p = 0.04), and that males had greater increases. Total VL was independently associated with hypertrophy only among females (β = 0.12; p < 0.01). For males, only baseline strength was (inversely) related to hypertrophy (β = −0.12; p = 0.04). VL was strongly associated with changes in 1RM strength improvement for both males (β = 0.66; p < 0.01) and females (β = 0.26; p = 0.02), but only related to MVC among females (β = 0.20; p = 0.02). Findings reveal that VL was independently associated with hypertrophy only among females. For males baseline strength was independently and inversely related to changes in muscle mass. Conversely, VL was found to be strongly associated with changes in 1RM for both males and females, controlling for age, body mass, and baseline strength.
KeywordsStrength training Volume load FAMuSS Muscle mass Periodization
We acknowledge Ms. Pheobe Stapleton and Mr. Mathew Kampert for their assistance with this investigation. This research was supported by the NIH, NICHD, NCMRR Grant #5-T32-HD007422. No financial disclosures were reported by the authors of this paper. The results of the present study do not constitute endorsement by ACSM.
- Aagaard P, Andersen JL, Dyhre-Poulsen P, Leffers AM, Wagner A, Magnusson SP, Halkjaer-Kristensen J, Simonsen EB (2001) A mechanism for increased contractile strength of human pennate muscle in response to strength training: changes in muscle architecture. J Physiol 534:613–623PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Baechle T, Earle R, Wathen D (2008) Resistance Training. In: Baechle T, Earle R (eds) Essentials of strength training and conditioning. Human Kinetics, Champaign, pp 381–412Google Scholar
- Campos GE, Luecke TJ, Wendeln HK, Toma K, Hagerman FC, Murray TF, Ragg KE, Ratamess NA, Kraemer WJ, Staron RS (2002) Muscular adaptations in response to three different resistance-training regimens: specificity of repetition maximum training zones. Eur J Appl Physiol 88:50–60PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Haff GG, Jackson JR, Kawamori N, Carlock JM, Hartman MJ, Kilgore JL, Morris RT, Ramsey MW, Sands WA, Stone MH (2008) Force–time curve characteristics and hormonal alterations during an eleven-week training period in elite women weightlifters. J Strength Cond Res 22:433–446PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hubal MJ, Gordish-Dressman H, Thompson PD, Price TB, Hoffman EP, Angelopoulos TJ, Gordon PM, Moyna NM, Pescatello LS, Visich PS, Zoeller RF, Seip RL, Clarkson PM (2005) Variability in muscle size and strength gain after unilateral resistance training. Med Sci Sports Exerc 37:964–972PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar