European Journal of Applied Physiology

, Volume 110, Issue 1, pp 191–198 | Cite as

Reference change values of blood analytes from physically active subjects

  • Lázaro Alessandro S. Nunes
  • René Brenzikofer
  • Denise Vaz de Macedo
Original Article

Abstract

The analysis of blood constituents allows the detection of various physiological or pathological states when their values are increased or decreased in relation to a well-defined reference group or to themselves if monitored longitudinally. In the latter case, it is important to know the reference change value (RCV) or critical difference, which defines the percentage change that should be exceeded—given the analytical and biological variations inherent to a particular test, in that there is a significant difference between the two consecutive measurements. Our objective was to calculate the biological variation, analytical variation and RCV of the biochemical and hematological parameters in subjects undergoing 4 months of regular aerobic training. Blood samples (10 mL) were collected monthly from 56 male subjects (17–19 years old). Creatine kinase and aspartate aminotransferase activities, total cholesterol, triglycerides, uric acid, C-reactive protein, alpha-1-acid glycoprotein, creatinine and urea concentrations were measured in sera using an Autolab Boehringer analyzer. Hemogram were obtained from total blood using KX-21 N SYSMEX® equipment. The RCV values for leukocytes and all biochemical analytes were elevated compared to the literature values of sedentary subjects. On the other hand, the RCV values for red blood cell count were slightly lower in physically active than in sedentary individuals. Knowledge of analyte RCV values within physically active subjects should improve the sensitivity/specificity of the hematological and biochemical alterations induced by training or the use of recombinant form of erythropoietin through blood parameter analysis, particularly in cases of longitudinal monitoring.

Keywords

Critical difference Training Exercise Biological variation Index of individuality 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the biomedical Ana Porto and the researchers Madla Adami dos Passos and Lucas Samuel Tessuti for their assessment of the given technique. We also thank Dr. Per Hyltoft Petersen for his comments about RCV. This study was financed by the Brazilian agencies Fapesp (03/09923-2P), Funcamp (BIO100) and CNPq. Lázaro Alessandro S. Nunes was a CNPq scholarship holder.

References

  1. Banfi G, Del Fabbro M, Lippi G (2009) Serum creatinine concentration and creatinine-based estimation of glomerular filtration rate in athletes. Sports Med 39(4):331–337CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Biosca C, Ricós C, Lauzurica R, Galimany R (2001) Reference change value concept combining two delta values to predict crises in renal post transplantation. Clin Chem 47:2146–2148PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Costongs GMPJ, Janson PCW, Bas BM, Hermans J, Brombacher PJ, van Wersch JWJ (1985) Short-term and long-term intra-individual variations and critical differences of hematological laboratory parameters. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 23:69–76PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Demacker PNM, Schade RWB, Jansen RTP, Van’t Laar A (1982) Intra-individual variation of serum cholesterol, triglycerides and high density lipoprotein cholesterol in normal humans. Atherosclerosis 45:259–266CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Dot D, Miró J, Fuentes-Arderiu X (1992) Within-subject biological variation of hematological quantities and analytical goals. Arch Pathol Lab Med 116:825–826PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Eckfeldt JH, Chambless LE, Shen Y (1994) Short-term, within-person variability in clinical chemistry test results. Arch Pathol Lab Med 118:496–500PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Finaud J, Lac G, Filaire E (2006) Oxidative stress. Relationship with exercise and training. Sports Med 36(4):327–358CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Fraser CG (2001) Biological variation: from principles to practice. AACC Press, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  9. Fraser CG (2004) Inherent biological variation and reference values. Clin Chem Lab Med 42(7):758–764CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Fraser CG, Harris EK (1989) Generation and application of data on biological variation in clinical chemistry. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci 27(5):409–437CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Fraser CG, Petersen PH (1999) Analytical performance characteristics should be judged against objective quality specifications. Clin Chem 45(3):321–323PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Fraser CG, Wilkinson SP, Neville RG et al (1989) Biologic variation of common hematologic laboratory quantities in the elderly. Am J Clin Pathol 92:465–470PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Fraser CG, Hyltoft Petersen P, Libeer JC et al (1997) Proposals for setting generally applicable quality goals solely based on biology. Ann Clin Biochem 34:8–12PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Harris EK (1974) Effects of intra and interindividual variation on the appropriate use of normal ranges. Clin Chem 20(12):1535–1542PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Harris EK, Yasaka T (1983) On the calculation of a “reference change” or comparing two consecutive measurements. Clin Chem 29:25–30PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Iglesias N, Petersen PH, Ricós C (2005) Power functions of the reference change value in relation to cut-off points, reference intervals and index of individuality. Clin Chem Lab Med 43(4):441–448CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Jones AR, Twedt D, Swaim W, Gottfried E (1996) Diurnal change of blood count analytes in normal subjects. Am J Clin Pathol 106:723–727PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Lac G, Maso F (2004) Biological markers for the follow-up of athletes throughout the training season. Pathol Biol 52:43–49CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Lazarim FL, Antunes-Neto JMF, Oliveira da Silva FC et al (2009) The upper values of creatine kinase of professional soccer players during a brazilian national championship. J Sci Med Sport 12(1):85–90CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Lippi G, Montagnana M, Franchini M, Favaloro EJ, Targher G (2008) The paradoxical relationship between serum uric acid and cardiovascular disease. Clin Chim Acta 392:1–7CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Macy EM, Hayes TE, Tracy RP (1997) Variability in the measurement of C-reactive protein in healthy subjects: implications for reference intervals and epidemiological applications. Clin Chem 43(1):52–58PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Malcovati L, Pascutto C, Cazzola M (2003) Hematologic passport for athletes competing in endurance sports: a feasibility study. Haematologica 88:570–581PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Omar F, van der Watt GF, Pillay TS (2008) Reference change values: how useful are they? J Clin Pathol 61:426–427CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Pattwell DM, McArdle A, Morgan JE, Patridge TA, Jackson MJ (2004) Release of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species from contracting skeletal muscle cells. Free Radic Biol Med 37(7):1064–1072CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Peake JM, Suzuki K, Coombee JS (2007) The influence of antioxidant supplementation on markers of inflammation and relationship to oxidative stress after exercise. J Nutr Biochem 18(6):357–371CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Petersen PH, Fraser CG, Sandberg S et al (1999) The index of individuality is often a misinterpreted quantity characteristic. Clin Chem Lab Med 37(6):655–661CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Ricós C, Alvarez V, Cava F et al. (1999) Current databases on biologic variation: pros, cons and progress. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 59:491–500. Available via DIALOG. http://www.westgard.com/biodatabase1.htm Accessed 20 September 2009Google Scholar
  28. Ricós C, Cava F, Garcia-Lario JV et al (2004) The reference change value: a proposal to interpret laboratory reports in serial testing based on biological variation. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 64:175–184CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Ricós C, Iglesias N, Garcia-Lario JV et al (2007) Within-subject biological variation in disease: collated data and clinical consequences. Ann Clin Biochem 44:343–352CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Rifai N, Warnick GR (2004) Quality specifications and the assessment of the biochemical risk of atherosclerosis. Clin Chim Acta 346:55–64CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Robinson N, Sottas PE, Mangin P, Saugy M (2007) Bayesian detection of abnormal hematological values to introduce a no-start rule for heterogeneous populations of athletes. Haematologica 92(8):1142–1144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ross SM, Fraser CG (1998) Biological variation of cardiac markers: analytical and clinical considerations. Ann Clin Biochem 35:80–84PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Sawka MN, Convertino VA, Eichner RE, Schnieder SM, Young AJ (2000) Blood volume: importance and adaptations to exercise training, environmental stresses, and trauma/sickness. Med Sci Sports Exerc 32(2):332–348CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Smith SJ, Cooper GR, Myers GL, Sampson EJ (1993) Biological variability in concentrations of serum lipids: sources of variation among results from published studies and composite predicted values. Clin Chem 39(6):1012–1022PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Solberg HE (2004) The IFCC recommendations on estimation of reference intervals. The RefVal Program. Clin Chem Lab Med 42(7):710–714CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Statland BE, Winkel P, Harris SC, Burdsall MJ, Saunders AM (1978) Evaluation of biologic sources of variation of leukocyte counts and other hematologic quantities using very precise automated analyzers. Am J Clin Pathol 69(1):48–54PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Talwar DK, Azharuddin MK, Williamson C et al (2005) Biological variation of vitamins in blood of healthy individuals. Clin Chem 51:2145–2150CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Trujillo-Ortiz A, Hernandez-Walls R (2003) Cochtest: Cochran’s test for homogeneity of variances for equal or unequal sample sizes. Available via DIALOG. http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/loadFile.do?objectId=3292&objectType=FILE. Accessed 20 September 2009
  39. Weight LM, Byrne MJ, Jacobs P (1991) Haemolytic effects of exercise. Clin Sci (Lond) 81(2):147–152Google Scholar
  40. Wu AHB, Lu QA, Todd J, Moecks J, Wians F (2009a) Short- and long-term biological variation in cardiac troponin I measured with a high-sensitivity assay: implications for clinical practice. Clin Chem 55:52–58CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Wu AHB, Smith A, Wians F (2009b) Interpretation of creatine kinase and aldolase for statin-induced myopaty: reliance on serial testing based on biological variation. Clin Chim Acta 399:109–111CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Zar JH (1999) Biostatistical analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lázaro Alessandro S. Nunes
    • 1
  • René Brenzikofer
    • 2
  • Denise Vaz de Macedo
    • 1
  1. 1.Departamento de Bioquímica, Laboratório de Bioquímica do Exercício–LABEX, Instituto de BiologiaUniversidade de Campinas–Unicamp, Cidade Universitária Zeferino VazCampinasBrazil
  2. 2.Laboratório de Instrumentação em Biomecânica, Faculdade de Educação FísicaUniversidade de Campinas–UnicampCampinasBrazil

Personalised recommendations