Enhancing the weight training experience: a comparison of limb kinematics and EMG activity on three machines
- 594 Downloads
The aim of the study was to compare the kinematics and the timing and amount of electromyographic (EMG) activity during the lat-pull down exercise performed on machines that afforded one, two, or three degrees of freedom for the movement. Seven healthy men (age 29.4 ± 5.6 years) participated in the study. The exercise was performed with a 30% 1-RM load. Three types of machines with varying degrees of freedom were used: Type 1, the conventional device that restricted the movement to a frontal plane; Type 2, the addition of forearm supination–pronation; Type 3, the addition of forearm supination–pronation and horizontal extension–flexion about the shoulder. All exercises involved a technique known as beginning movement load (BML) training in which light loads are lifted with a relaxation-lengthening-shortening sequence of muscle activation. The Type-3 machine showed: (1) the greatest vertical displacement of the wrist (p < 0.05); (2) the greatest abduction–adduction displacement about the shoulder (p < 0.01); (3) the least flexion–extension displacement about the elbow joint (p < 0.01); (4) a peak vertical velocity for the shoulder that preceded (p < 0.01) those for the elbow and then wrist during the pull-down phase; (5) a progressive proximal-to-distal sequence of EMG activation involving the serratus anterior, posterior deltoid, latissimus dorsi, and triceps brachii muscles; (6) a reversal of the roles for biceps and triceps brachii during the pull-down phase. These results suggest that BML exercises with greater degrees of freedom can enhance the association between training actions and functional activities.
KeywordsEMG activity Kinematics Beginning movement load training Dodge movement
We are grateful to the staff members of BMLT Foundation of Research, who helped this study. The present study was partly supported by grants from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan (2008–2010, No: 20500561 for SS), the Academic Frontier Project (Waseda University, 2005–2010) of the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan.
- Alexander NB, Galecki AT, Grenier ML, Nyquist LV, Hofmeyer MR, Grunawalt JC, Medell JL, Fry-Welch D (2001) Task-specific resistance training to improve the ability of activities of daily living-impaired older adults to rise from a bed and from a chair. J Am Geriatr Soc 49:1418–1427CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Barry BK, Riek S, Carson RG (2005a) Muscle coordination during rapid force production by young and older adults. J Gerontol 60A:232–240Google Scholar
- Basmajian JV, Latif A (1957) Integrated actions and functions of the chief flexors of the elbow. J Bone Joint Surg 39A:1106–1118Google Scholar
- Elliott B, Marshall R, Noffal G (1995) Contributions of upper limb segment rotations during the power serve in tennis. J Appl Biomech 11:433–442Google Scholar
- Feltner ME (1989) Three-dimensional interactions in a two-segment kinetic chain. Part II: Application to the throwing arm in baseball pitching. Int J Sports Biomech 5:420–450Google Scholar
- Freedman L, Munro RR (1966) Abduction of the arm in the scapular plane: scapular and glenohumeral movements. J Bone Joint Surg 48A:1503–1510Google Scholar
- Koyama Y (1994) The training revolution (in Japanese). Kodansha Ltd, TokyoGoogle Scholar
- Koyama Y (1999) The baseball training revolution by BML theory (in Japanese). Baseball Magazine Ltd, TokyoGoogle Scholar
- Koyama Y (2004) ‘Miraculous’ training—BML training changes the world (in Japanese). Kodansha Ltd, TokyoGoogle Scholar
- Miszko TA, Cress ME, Slade JM, Covey CJ, Agrawal SK, Doerr CE (2003) Effect of strength and power training on physical function in community-dwelling older adults. J Gerontol 58A:171–175Google Scholar
- Suzuki S, Fujimori T, Yoshida M, Koyama Y (2005) Biomechanics and neuromuscular control of the beginning movement load training. Jap J Biomech Sports Exerc 9:26–33 (in Japanese)Google Scholar