Advertisement

Influence of crank length on cycle ergometry performance of well-trained female cross-country mountain bike athletes

  • Paul William Macdermid
  • Andrew M. Edwards
Original Article

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the differential effects of three commonly used crank lengths (170, 172.5 and 175 mm) on performance measures relevant to female cross-country mountain bike athletes (n = 7) of similar stature. All trials were performed in a single blind and balanced order with a 5- to 7-day period between trials. Both saddle height and fore-aft position to pedal axle distance at a crank angle of 90° was controlled across all trials. The laboratory tests comprised a supra-maximal (peak power-cadence); an isokinetic (50 rpm) test; and a maximal test of aerobic capacity. The time to reach supra-maximal peak power was significantly (P < 0.05) shorter in the 170 mm (2.57 ± 0.79 s) condition compared to 175 mm (3.29 ± 0.76 s). This effect represented a mean performance advantage of 27.8% for 170 mm compared to 175 mm. There was no further inter-condition differences between performance outcome measurements derived for the isokinetic (50 rpm) maximum power output, isokinetic (50 rpm) mean power output or indices of endurance performance. The decreased time to peak power with the greater rate of power development in the 170 mm condition suggests a race advantage may be achieved using a shorter crank length than commonly observed. Additionally, there was no impediment to either power output produced at low cadences or indices of endurance performance using the shorter crank length and the advantage of being able to respond quickly to a change in terrain could be of strategic importance to elite athletes.

Keywords

Propulsion Cranks Bike position Levers 

References

  1. Bell W, Cobner DM (2007) Effect of individual time to peak power output on the expression of peak power output in the 30-s Wingate anaerobic test. Int J Sports Med 28:135–139CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Borg G, Ljunggren G, Ceci R (1985) The increase in perceived exertion, aches and pain in the legs, heart rate and blood lactate during exercise on a bicycle ergometer. Eur J Appl Physiol 54:343–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Conrad DP (1983) Bicycle crank arm length and oxygen consumption in trained cyclists. Med Sci Sports Exerc 15(2):111–112Google Scholar
  4. Gregor RJ, Rugg SG (1986) Effects of saddle height and pedaling cadence on power output and efficiency. In: Burke ER (ed) Science of cycling. Human Kinetics, Champaign, pp 69–90Google Scholar
  5. Hamley EJ, Thomas V (1976) Physiological and postural factors in calibration of bicycle ergometer. J Physiol 191:55–57Google Scholar
  6. Hull ML, Gonzalez H (1988) Bivariate optimization of pedalling rate and crank arm length in cycling. J Biomech 21(10):839–849CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Impellizzeri FM, Marcora SM (2007) The physiology of mountain biking. Sports Med 37(1):59–71CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Impellizzeri FM, Marcora SM, Rampinini E, Mognoni P, Sassi A (2005) Correlations between physiological variables and performance in high level cross country off road cyclists. Br J Sports Med 39:747–751CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Inbar O, Dotan R, Trousil T, Dvir Z (1983) The effect of bicycle crank length variation upon power performance. Ergonomics 26(12):1139–1146CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Lucia A, Hoyos J, Perez M, Chicharro JL (2000) Heart rate and performance parameters in elite cyclists: a longitudinal study. Med Sci Sports Exerc 32:1777–1782CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Martin JC, Spirduso WW (2001) Determinants of maximal cycling power: crank length, pedalling rate and pedal speed. Eur J Appl Physiol 84:413–418CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Morris DM, Londeree BR (1997) The effects of bicycle arm length on oxygen consumption. Can J Appl Physiol 22(5):429–438PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Neptune RR, Herzog W (2000) Adaptation of muscle coordination to altered task mechanics during steady-state cycling. J Biomech 33:165–172CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Nordeen-Snyder KS (1977) The effect of bicycle seat height variation upon oxygen consumption and lower limb kinematics. Med Sci Sports Exerc 9:113–117Google Scholar
  15. Stapelfeldt B, Schirtz A, Schumacher YO, Hillebretch M (2004) Workload demands in mountain bike racing. Int J Sports Med 25:294–300CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Too D (1994) The effect of trunk angle on power production in cycling. Res Q Exerc Sport 65(4):308–315PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Too D, Landwer GE (2000) The effect of pedal crank arm length on joint angle and power production in upright cycle ergometry. J Sports Sci 18:153–161CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Wooles A, Keen P, Palfreeman R (2003) Protocols used for the physiological testing of the Great Britain cycling team. Version 1.6 British cycling test methods manual, 22 SeptemberGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universal College of LearningPalmerston NorthNew Zealand
  2. 2.James Cook UniversityTownsvilleAustralia

Personalised recommendations