Advertisement

European Journal of Applied Physiology

, Volume 107, Issue 2, pp 235–241 | Cite as

Comparison between electrically evoked and voluntary isometric contractions for biceps brachii muscle oxidative metabolism using near-infrared spectroscopy

  • Makii Muthalib
  • Marc Jubeau
  • Guillaume Y. Millet
  • Nicola A. Maffiuletti
  • Kazunori NosakaEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

This study compared voluntary (VOL) and electrically evoked isometric contractions by muscle stimulation (EMS) for changes in biceps brachii muscle oxygenation (tissue oxygenation index, ∆TOI) and total haemoglobin concentration (∆tHb = oxygenated haemoglobin + deoxygenated haemoglobin) determined by near-infrared spectroscopy. Twelve men performed EMS with one arm followed 24 h later by VOL with the contralateral arm, consisting of 30 repeated (1-s contraction, 1-s relaxation) isometric contractions at 30% of maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) for the first 60 s, and maximal intensity contractions thereafter (MVC for VOL and maximal tolerable current at 30 Hz for EMS) until MVC decreased ~30% of pre-exercise MVC. During the 30 contractions at 30% MVC, ∆TOI decrease was significantly (P < 0.05) greater and ∆tHb was significantly (P < 0.05) lower for EMS than VOL, suggesting that the metabolic demand for oxygen in EMS is greater than VOL at the same torque level. However, during maximal intensity contractions, although EMS torque (~40% of VOL) was significantly (P < 0.05) lower than VOL, ∆TOI was similar and ∆tHb was significantly (P < 0.05) lower for EMS than VOL towards the end, without significant differences between the two sessions in the recovery period. It is concluded that the oxygen demand of the activated biceps brachii muscle in EMS is comparable to VOL at maximal intensity.

Keywords

Electrical muscle stimulation Muscle oxygenation Fatigue Oxygen supply Maximal voluntary contraction Oxygen consumption 

Notes

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to thank Prof. Marco Ferrari for his constructive feedback in the revision of the manuscript.

References

  1. Bax L, Staes F, Verhagen A (2005) Does neuromuscular electrical stimulation strengthen the quadriceps femoris? A systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Sports Med 35:191–212PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boushel R, Langberg H, Olesen J, Gonzales-Alonzo J, Bulow J, Kjaer M (2001) Monitoring tissue oxygen availability with near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) in health and disease. Scand J Med Sci Sports 11:213–222PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Colson SS, Martin A, Van Hoecke J (2008) Effects of electromyostimulation versus voluntary isometric training on elbow flexor muscle strength. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2008.05.009
  4. DeLorey DS, Kowalchuk JM, Paterson DH (2003) Relationship between pulmonary O2 uptake kinetics and muscle deoxygenation during moderate-intensity exercise. J Appl Physiol 95:113–120PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Felici F, Quaresima V, Fattorini L, Sbriccoli P, Filligoi GC, Ferrari M (2009) Biceps brachii myoelectric and oxygenation changes during static and sinusoidal isometric exercises. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 92:e1–e11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gregory CM, Bickel CS (2005) Recruitment patterns in human skeletal muscle during electrical stimulation. Phys Ther 85:358–364PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Hamaoka T, McCully KK, Quaresima V, Yamamoto K, Chance B (2007) Near-infrared spectroscopy/imaging for monitoring muscle oxygenation and oxidative metabolism in healthy and diseased humans. J Biomed Opt 12:062105PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jubeau M, Zory R, Gondin J, Martin A, Maffiuletti NA (2006) Late neural adaptations to electrostimulation resistance training of the plantar flexor muscles. Eur J Appl Physiol 98:202–211PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jubeau M, Gondin J, Martin A, Sartorio A, Maffiuletti NA (2007a) Random motor unit activation by electrostimulation. Int J Sports Med 28:901–904PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jubeau M, Zory R, Gondin J, Martin A, Maffiuletti NA (2007b) Effect of electrostimulation training-detraining on neuromuscular fatigue mechanisms. Neurosci Lett 424:41–46PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kime R, Hamaoka T, Sako T, Murakami M, Homma T, Katsumura T, Chance B (2003) Delayed reoxygenation after maximal isometric handgrip exercise in high oxidative capacity muscle. Eur J Appl Physiol 89:34–41PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kooistra RD, de Ruiter CJ, de Haan A (2008) Knee angle-dependent oxygen consumption of human quadriceps muscles during maximal voluntary and electrically evoked contractions. Eur J Appl Physiol 102:233–242PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lutjemeier BJ, Ferreira LF, Poole DC, Townsend D, Barstow TJ (2008) Muscle microvascular hemoglobin concentration and oxygenation within the contraction-relaxation cycle. Respir Physiol Neurobiol 160:131–138PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Maffiuletti NA, Cometti G, Amiridis IG, Martin A, Pousson M, Chatard JC (2000) The effects of electromyostimulation training and basketball practice on muscle strength and jumping ability. Int J Sports Med 21:437–443PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Maffiuletti NA, Pensini M, Martin A (2002) Activation of human plantar flexor muscles increases after electromyostimulation training. J Appl Physiol 92:1383–1392PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. McCully KK, Hamaoka T (2000) Near-infrared spectroscopy: what can it tell us about oxygen saturation in skeletal muscle? Exerc Sport Sci Rev 28:123–127PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. McNeil CJ, Murray BJ, Rice CL (2006) Differential changes in muscle oxygenation between voluntary and stimulated isometric fatigue of human dorsiflexors. J Appl Physiol 100:890–895PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Theurel J, Lepers R, Pardon L, Maffiuletti NA (2007) Differences in cardiorespiratory and neuromuscular responses between voluntary and stimulated contractions of the quadriceps femoris muscle. Respir Physiol Neurobiol 157:341–347PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Vanderthommen M, Duchateau J (2007) Electrical stimulation as a modality to improve performance of the neuromuscular system. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 35:180–185PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Vanderthommen M, Depresseux JC, Bauvir P, Degueldre C, Delfiore G, Peters JM, Sluse F, Crielaard JM (1997) A positron emission tomography study of voluntarily and electrically contracted human quadriceps. Muscle Nerve 20:505–507PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Vanderthommen M, Duteil S, Wary C, Raynaud JS, Leroy-Willig A, Crielaard JM, Carlier PG (2003) A comparison of voluntary and electrically induced contractions by interleaved 1H- and 31P-NMRS in humans. J Appl Physiol 94:1012–1024PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Makii Muthalib
    • 1
  • Marc Jubeau
    • 1
    • 2
  • Guillaume Y. Millet
    • 1
    • 3
  • Nicola A. Maffiuletti
    • 4
  • Kazunori Nosaka
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.School of Exercise, Biomedical and Health SciencesEdith Cowan UniversityJoondalupAustralia
  2. 2.Laboratory INSERM U887, Faculty of Sport SciencesUniversity of BurgundyDijonFrance
  3. 3.Exercise Physiology LaboratoryJean Monnet UniversitySaint-EtienneFrance
  4. 4.Neuromuscular Research LaboratorySchulthess ClinicZürichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations