Do we really need a central governor to explain brain regulation of exercise performance?
Letter to the Editor
- 1.7k Downloads
In this paper two different models of brain regulation of exercise performance are critically compared: the central governor model proposed by Noakes and colleagues, and an alternative psycholobiological model based on motivational intensity theory.
KeywordsPerception of effort Exercise performance Brain Central governor Motivation Psychobiology
- Marcora SM (2007) Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem. J Physiol 578:371Google Scholar
- Marcora SM (2008) Perception of effort during exercise is independent of afferent feedback from skeletal muscles heart and lungs. J Appl Physiol, 10.1152/japplphysiol.90378.2008
- Marcora SM, Bosio A, de Morree HM (2008) Locomotor muscle fatigue increases cardiorespiratory responses and reduces performance during intense cycling exercise independently from metabolic stress. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 294:R874–R883. doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00678.2007 PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wright RA (1996) Brehm’s theory of motivation as a model of effort and cardiovascular response. In: Gollwitzer PM, Bargh JA (eds), The psychology of action: Linking cognition and motivation to behavior. Guilford, New York, pp 424–453Google Scholar
© Springer-Verlag 2008