Do we really need a central governor to explain brain regulation of exercise performance?

Letter to the Editor

Abstract

In this paper two different models of brain regulation of exercise performance are critically compared: the central governor model proposed by Noakes and colleagues, and an alternative psycholobiological model based on motivational intensity theory.

Keywords

Perception of effort Exercise performance Brain Central governor Motivation Psychobiology 

References

  1. Crewe H, Tucker R, Noakes TD (2008) The rate of increase in rating of perceived exertion predicts the duration of exercise to fatigue at a fixed power output in different environmental conditions. Eur J Appl Physiol 103:569–577. doi:10.1007/s00421-008-0741-7 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Gandevia SC (2001) Spinal and supraspinal factors in human muscle fatigue. Physiol Rev 81:1725–1789PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Marcora SM (2007) Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem. J Physiol 578:371Google Scholar
  4. Marcora SM (2008) Perception of effort during exercise is independent of afferent feedback from skeletal muscles heart and lungs. J Appl Physiol, 10.1152/japplphysiol.90378.2008
  5. Marcora SM, Bosio A, de Morree HM (2008) Locomotor muscle fatigue increases cardiorespiratory responses and reduces performance during intense cycling exercise independently from metabolic stress. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 294:R874–R883. doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00678.2007 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Noakes TD (2000) Physiological models to understand exercise fatigue and the adaptations that predict or enhance athletic performance. Scand J Med Sci Sports 10:123–145. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0838.2000.010003123.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Noakes TD (2007) Determining the extent of neural activation during maximal effort. Med Sci Sports Exerc 39:2092. doi:10.1249/mss.0b013e3180337dc2 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. St Clair Gibson A, Noakes TD (2004) Evidence for complex system integration and dynamic neural regulation of skeletal muscle recruitment during exercise in humans. Br J Sports Med 38:797–806. doi:10.1136/bjsm.2003.009852 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Taylor JL, Gandevia SC (2008) A comparison of central aspects of fatigue in submaximal and maximal voluntary contractions. J Appl Physiol 104:542–550. doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.01053.2007 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Wright RA (1996) Brehm’s theory of motivation as a model of effort and cardiovascular response. In: Gollwitzer PM, Bargh JA (eds), The psychology of action: Linking cognition and motivation to behavior. Guilford, New York, pp 424–453Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Sport, Health and Exercise SciencesBangor UniversityBangorUK

Personalised recommendations