European Journal of Applied Physiology

, Volume 102, Issue 6, pp 685–694 | Cite as

Role of muscle mass on sprint performance: gender differences?

  • Jorge Perez-Gomez
  • German Vicente Rodriguez
  • Ignacio Ara
  • Hugo Olmedillas
  • Javier Chavarren
  • Juan Jose González-Henriquez
  • Cecilia Dorado
  • José A. L. Calbet
Original Article

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine if gender differences in muscle mass explain the gender differences in running and cycling sprint performance. Body composition (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry), and running (30 and 300 m test) and cycling (Wingate test) sprint performance were assessed in 123 men and 32 women. Peak power (PP) output in the Wingate test expressed per kg of lower extremities lean mass (LM) was similar in males and females (50.4 ± 5.6 and 50.5 ± 6.2 W kg−1, P = 0.88). No gender differences were observed in the slope of the linear relation between LM and PP or mean power output (MP). However, when MP was expressed per kg of LM, the males attained a 22% higher value (26.6 ± 3.4 and 21.9 ± 3.2 W kg−1, P < 0.001). The 30 and 300-m running time divided by the relative lean mass of the lower extremities (RLM = LM × 100/body mass) was significantly lower in males than in females. Although, the slope of the linear relationship between RLM and 300-m running time was not significantly different between genders, the males achieved better performance in the 300-m test than the females. The main factor accounting for gender differences in peak and mean power output during cycling is the muscle mass of the lower extremities. Although, the peak power generating capability of the muscle is similar in males and females, muscle mass only partially explains the gender difference in running sprints, even when expressed as a percentage of the whole body mass.

Keywords

Anaerobic capacity Cycle ergometry Short sprint Gender Exercise 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank José Navarro de Tuero for his excellent technical assistance and to Fiona Wong for her wonderful editorial skills. This study was supported by grants from the Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia (BFI2003-09638, DEP2006-56076-C06-04/ACTI and FEDER) and the Gobierno de Canarias (PI2005/177). Special thanks are given to all subjects who volunteered for these experiments.

References

  1. Abe T, Brechue WF, Fujita S, Brown JB (1998) Gender differences in FFM accumulation and architectural characteristics of muscle. Med Sci Sports Exerc 30:1066–1070PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abe T, Fukashiro S, Harada Y, Kawamoto K (2001) Relationship between sprint performance and muscle fascicle length in female sprinters. J Physiol Anthropol Appl Human Sci 20:141–147PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alway SE, Grumbt WH, Gonyea WJ, Stray-Gundersen J (1989) Contrasts in muscle and myofibers of elite male and female bodybuilders. J Appl Physiol 67:24–31PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Ara I, Vicente-Rodriguez G, Perez-Gomez J, Jimenez-Ramirez J, Serrano-Sanchez J, Dorado C, Calbet J (2006) Influence of extracurricular sport activities on body composition and physical fitness in boys: a 3-year longitudinal study. Int J Obes (Lond) 30:1062–1071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baker D, Nance S (1999) The relation between running speed and measures of strength and power in professional rugby league players. J Strength Cond Res 13:230–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bamman MM, Newcomer BR, Larson-Meyer DE, Weinsier RL, Hunter GR (2000) Evaluation of the strength–size relationship in vivo using various muscle size indices. Med Sci Sports Exerc 32:1307–1313PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bar-Or O (1987) The Wingate anaerobic test. An update on methodology, reliability and validity. Sports Med 4:381–394PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blackburn JT, Riemann BL, Padua DA, Guskiewicz KM (2004) Sex comparison of extensibility, passive, and active stiffness of the knee flexors. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 19:36–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blackburn JT, Padua DA, Weinhold PS, Guskiewicz KM (2006) Comparison of triceps surae structural stiffness and material modulus across sex. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 21:159–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Booth FW, Thomason DB (1991) Molecular and cellular adaptation of muscle in response to exercise: perspectives of various models. Physiol Rev 71:541–585PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Borges O, Essen-Gustavsson B (1989) Enzyme activities in type I and II muscle fibres of human skeletal muscle in relation to age and torque development. Acta Physiol Scand 136:29–36PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Bottinelli R (2001) Functional heterogeneity of mammalian single muscle fibres: do myosin isoforms tell the whole story? Pflugers Arch 443:6–17PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Calbet JA, Chavarren J, Dorado C (1997) Fractional use of anaerobic capacity during a 30- and a 45-s Wingate test. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 76:308–313PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Calbet JA, Dorado C, Diaz-Herrera P, Rodriguez-Rodriguez LP (2001) High femoral bone mineral content and density in male football (soccer) players. Med Sci Sports Exerc 33:1682–1687PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Calbet JA, De Paz JA, Garatachea N, Cabeza de Vaca S, Chavarren J (2003) Anaerobic energy provision does not limit Wingate exercise performance in endurance-trained cyclists. J Appl Physiol 94:668–676PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Cavagna GA, Komarek L, Mazzoleni S (1971) The mechanics of sprint running. J Physiol 217:709–721PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Costill DL, Daniels J, Evans W, Fink W, Krahenbuhl G, Saltin B (1976) Skeletal muscle enzymes and fiber composition in male and female track athletes. J Appl Physiol 40:149–154PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Cronin J, Sleivert G (2005) Challenges in understanding the influence of maximal power training on improving athletic performance. Sports Med 35:213–234PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chelly SM, Denis C (2001) Leg power and hopping stiffness: relationship with sprint running performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc 33:326–333PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Cheuvront SN, Carter R, Deruisseau KC, Moffatt RJ (2005) Running performance differences between men and women:an update. Sports Med 35:1017–1024PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Chleboun GS, Howell JN, Conatser RR, Giesey JJ (1997) The relationship between elbow flexor volume and angular stiffness at the elbow. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 12:383–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Driss T, Vandewalle H, Monod H (1998) Maximal power and force–velocity relationships during cycling and cranking exercises in volleyball players. Correlation with the vertical jump test. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 38:286–293PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Essen-Gustavsson B, Henriksson J (1984) Enzyme levels in pools of microdissected human muscle fibres of identified type. Adaptive response to exercise. Acta Physiol Scand 120:505–515PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ford LE, Detterline AJ, Ho KK, Cao W (2000) Gender- and height-related limits of muscle strength in world weightlifting champions. J Appl Physiol 89:1061–1064PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Gajdosik RL, Giuliani CA, Bohannon RW (1990) Passive compliance and length of the hamstring muscles of healthy men and women. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 5:23–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Granata KP, Padua DA, Wilson SE (2002a) Gender differences in active musculoskeletal stiffness. Part II. Quantification of leg stiffness during functional hopping tasks. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 12:127–135PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Granata KP, Wilson SE, Padua DA (2002b) Gender differences in active musculoskeletal stiffness. Part I. Quantification in controlled measurements of knee joint dynamics. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 12:119–126PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Green S (1995) Measurement of anaerobic work capacities in humans. Sports Med 19:32–42PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Green HJ, Fraser IG, Ranney DA (1984) Male and female differences in enzyme activities of energy metabolism in vastus lateralis muscle. J Neurol Sci 65:323–331PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hill DW, Smith JC (1993) Gender difference in anaerobic capacity: role of aerobic contribution. Br J Sports Med 27:45–48PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Jaworowski A, Porter MM, Holmback AM, Downham D, Lexell J (2002) Enzyme activities in the tibialis anterior muscle of young moderately active men and women: relationship with body composition, muscle cross-sectional area and fibre type composition. Acta Physiol Scand 176:215–225PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Komi PV, Bosco C (1978) Utilization of stored elastic energy in leg extensor muscles by men and women. Med Sci Sports 10:261–265PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Komi PV, Karlsson J (1978) Skeletal muscle fibre types, enzyme activities and physical performance in young males and females. Acta Physiol Scand 103:210–218PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Korhonen MT, Mero A, Suominen H (2003) Age-related differences in 100-m sprint performance in male and female master runners. Med Sci Sports Exerc 35:1419–1428PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kubo K, Kanehisa H, Fukunaga T (2003) Gender differences in the viscoelastic properties of tendon structures. Eur J Appl Physiol 88:520–526PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kumagai K, Abe T, Brechue WF, Ryushi T, Takano S, Mizuno M (2000) Sprint performance is related to muscle fascicle length in male 100-m sprinters. J Appl Physiol 88:811–816PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Leger LA, Mercier D, Gadoury C, Lambert J (1988) The multistage 20 metre shuttle run test for aerobic fitness. J Sports Sci 6:93–101PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Lewis DA, Kamon E, Hodgson JL (1986) Physiological differences between genders. Implications for sports conditioning. Sports Med 3:357–369PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lucia A, Olivan J, Gomez-Gallego F, Santiago C, Montil M, Foster C (2007) Citius and longius (faster and longer) with no alpha-actinin-3 in skeletal muscles? Br J Sports Med 41:616–617PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Luhtanen P, Komi PV (1980) Force-, power-, and elasticity–velocity relationships in walking, running, and jumping. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 44:279–289PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. MacArthur DG, North KN (2004) A gene for speed? The evolution and function of alpha-actinin-3. Bioessays 26:786–795PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Macarthur DG, Seto JT, Raftery JM, Quinlan KG, Huttley GA, Hook JW, Lemckert FA, Kee AJ, Edwards MR, Berman Y, Hardeman EC, Gunning PW, Easteal S, Yang N, North KN (2007) Loss of ACTN3 gene function alters mouse muscle metabolism and shows evidence of positive selection in humans. Nat Genet 39:1261–1265PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Madsen OR, Lauridsen UB, Hartkopp A, Sorensen OH (1997) Muscle strength and soft tissue composition as measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in women aged 18–87 years. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 75:239–245PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Malisoux L, Francaux M, Nielens H, Theisen D (2006) Stretch-shortening cycle exercises: an effective training paradigm to enhance power output of human single muscle fibers. J Appl Physiol 100:771–779PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mayhew JL, Hancock K, Rollison L, Ball TE, Bowen JC (2001) Contributions of strength and body composition to the gender difference in anaerobic power. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 41:33–38PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Meckel Y, Atterbom H, Grodjinovsky A, Ben-Sira D, Rotstein A (1995) Physiological characteristics of female 100 metre sprinters of different performance levels. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 35:169–175PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Medbo JI, Tabata I (1993) Anaerobic energy release in working muscle during 30 s to 3 min of exhausting bicycling. J Appl Physiol 75:1654–1660PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Mero A, Luhtanen P, Viitasalo JT, Komi PV (1981) Relationship between the maximal running velocity, muscle fiber characteristics, force production and force relaxation of sprinters. Scand J Sports Sci 3:16–22Google Scholar
  49. Miller AE, MacDougall JD, Tarnopolsky MA, Sale DG (1993) Gender differences in strength and muscle fiber characteristics. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 66:254–262PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Nesser TW, Latin RW, Berg K, Prentice E (1996) Physiological determinants of 40-meter sprint performance in young male athletes. J Strength Cond Res 10:263–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Niemi AK, Majamaa K (2005) Mitochondrial DNA and ACTN3 genotypes in Finnish elite endurance and sprint athletes. Eur J Hum Genet 13:965–969PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Oatis CA (1993) The use of a mechanical model to describe the stiffness and damping characteristics of the knee joint in healthy adults. Phys Ther 73:740–749PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Parolin ML, Chesley A, Matsos MP, Spriet LL, Jones NL, Heigenhauser GJ (1999) Regulation of skeletal muscle glycogen phosphorylase and PDH during maximal intermittent exercise. Am J Physiol 277:E890–E900PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Prince FP, Hikida RS, Hagerman FC (1977) Muscle fiber types in women athletes and non-athletes. Pflugers Arch 371:161–165PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Riemann BL, DeMont RG, Ryu K, Lephart SM (2001) The effects of sex, joint angle, and the gastrocnemius muscle on passive ankle joint complex stiffness. J Athl Train 36:369–375PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Russell B, Motlagh D, Ashley WW (2000) Form follows function: how muscle shape is regulated by work. J Appl Physiol 88:1127–1132PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Sale DG, MacDougall JD, Alway SE, Sutton JR (1987) Voluntary strength and muscle characteristics in untrained men and women and male bodybuilders. J Appl Physiol 62:1786–1793PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Schantz P, Randall-Fox E, Hutchison W, Tyden A, Astrand PO (1983) Muscle fibre type distribution, muscle cross-sectional area and maximal voluntary strength in humans. Acta Physiol Scand 117:219–226PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Simoneau JA, Bouchard C (1989) Human variation in skeletal muscle fiber-type proportion and enzyme activities. Am J Physiol 257:E567–E572PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Simoneau JA, Bouchard C (1995) Genetic determinism of fiber type proportion in human skeletal muscle. FASEB J 9:1091–1095PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Tesch P, Karlsson J (1978) Isometric strength performance and muscle fibre type distribution in man. Acta Physiol Scand 103:47–51PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. van Ingen Schenau GJ, de Koning JJ, de Groot G (1994) Optimisation of sprinting performance in running, cycling and speed skating. Sports Med 17:259–275PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. van Langendonck L, Claessens AL, Lysens R, Koninckx PR, Beunen G (2004) Association between bone, body composition and strength in premenarcheal girls and postmenopausal women. Ann Hum Biol 31:228–244PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Vandewalle H, Peres G, Monod H (1987) Standard anaerobic exercise tests. Sports Med 4:268–289PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Vicente-Rodriguez G, Dorado C, Perez-Gomez J, Gonzalez-Henriquez J, Calbet J (2004) Enhanced bone mass and physical fitness in young female handball players. Bone 35:1208–1215PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Weber CL, Schneider DA (2000) Maximal accumulated oxygen deficit expressed relative to the active muscle mass for cycling in untrained male and female subjects. Eur J Appl Physiol 82:255–261PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Weber CL, Chia M, Inbar O (2006) Gender differences in anaerobic power of the arms and legs––a scaling issue. Med Sci Sports Exerc 38:129–137PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Weyand PG, Cureton KJ, Conley DS, Higbie EJ (1993) Peak oxygen deficit during one- and two-legged cycling in men and women. Med Sci Sports Exerc 25:584–591PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Weyand PG, Sternlight DB, Bellizzi MJ, Wright S (2000) Faster top running speeds are achieved with greater ground forces not more rapid leg movements. J Appl Physiol 89:1991–1999PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jorge Perez-Gomez
    • 1
  • German Vicente Rodriguez
    • 1
  • Ignacio Ara
    • 1
  • Hugo Olmedillas
    • 1
  • Javier Chavarren
    • 1
  • Juan Jose González-Henriquez
    • 2
  • Cecilia Dorado
    • 1
  • José A. L. Calbet
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Physical EducationUniversity of Las Palmas de Gran CanariaLas Palmas de Gran CanariaSpain
  2. 2.Department of MathematicsUniversity of Las Palmas de Gran CanariaLas Palmas de Gran CanariaSpain
  3. 3.Departamento de Educación FísicaCampus Universitario de TafiraLas Palmas de Gran CanariaSpain

Personalised recommendations