European Journal of Applied Physiology

, Volume 98, Issue 4, pp 402–410

The effects of varying time under tension and volume load on acute neuromuscular responses

Original Article

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of different methods of measuring training volume, controlled in different ways, on selected variables that reflect acute neuromuscular responses. Eighteen resistance-trained males performed three fatiguing protocols of dynamic constant external resistance exercise, involving elbow flexors, that manipulated either time-under-tension (TUT) or volume load (VL), defined as the product of training load and repetitions. Protocol A provided a standard for TUT and VL. Protocol B involved the same VL as Protocol A but only 40% concentric TUT; Protocol C was equated to Protocol A for TUT but only involved 50% VL. Fatigue was assessed by changes in maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC), interpolated doublet (ID), muscle twitch characteristics (peak twitch, time to peak twitch, 0.5 relaxation time, and mean rates of force development and twitch relaxation). All protocols produced significant changes (P ≤ 0.05) in the measures considered to reflect neuromuscular fatigue, with the exception of ID. Fatigue was related to an increase in either TUT or VL with greater fatigue, as reflected by MVIC and peripheral measures, being associated with differences in TUT. The lack of change in ID suggests that fatigue was more related to peripheral than central mechanisms. It was concluded that the load and contraction velocities of the repetitions have different effects on acute neuromuscular responses and should, therefore, be clearly calculated when describing training volume for dynamic constant external resistance exercise training.

Keywords

Contractile properties Contraction velocity Central Peripheral Fatigue 

References

  1. Allen GM, McKenzie DK, Gandevia SC (1998) Twitch interpolation of the elbow flexor muscles at high forces. Muscle Nerve 21:318–328PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Behm DG, Reardon G, Fitzgerald J, Drinkwater E (2002) The effect of 5, 10, and 20 repetition maximums on the recovery of voluntary and evoked contractile properties. J Strength Cond Res 16:209–218PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Behm DG, St-Pierre DM (1997) Effects of fatigue duration on muscle type and voluntary and evoked contractile properties. J Appl Physiol 82:1654–1661PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Behm DG, St-Pierre DM, Perez D (1996) Muscle inactivation: assessment of the interpolated twitch technique. J Appl Physiol 81:2267–2273PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Benson C, Docherty D, Brandenburg J (2006) Acute neuromuscular responses to resistance training performed at 100% and 90% of 10RM. J Sc Med Sports 9:135–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Byrd SK, Tarpenning KM, Marino FE (2005) Designing resistance training programmes to enhance muscular fitness. Sports Med 35:841–851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carpinelli RN, Otto RM (1998) Strength training: single set versus multiple sets. Sports Med 26:73–84PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. de Ruiter CJ, Elzinga MJH, Verdijk PWL, van Mechelen W, de Haan A (2005) Changes in force, surface and motor unit EMG during post-exercise development of low frequency fatigue in vastus lateralis muscle. Eur J Appl Physiol 94:659–559PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gandevia SC (2001) Spinal and supraspinal factors in human muscle fatigue. Physiol Rev 81:1725–1789PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Gandevia SC, Herbert RD, Leeper JB (1998) Voluntary activation of human elbow flexor muscles during maximal concentric contractions. J Physiol 512:595–602PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Garland SJ, Walton D, Ivanova TD (2003) Effect of force level and training status on contractile properties following fatigue. Can J Appl Physiol 28:93–101PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Hass CJ, Garzarella L, De Hoyos D, Pollock ML (2000) Single versus multiple sets in long-term recreational weightlifters. Med Sci Sports Exer 32:235–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ingalls CP, Warren GL, Williams JH, Ward CW, Armstrong RB (1998) E-C coupling failure in mouse EDL muscle after in vivo eccentric contractions. J Appl Physiol 85:58–67PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Jones DA (1996) High- and low-freqeuency fatgue revisited. Acta Physiol Scand 156:265–270PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Keeler LK, Finkelstein LH, Miller W, Fernhall B (2001) Early-phase adaptations of traditional-speed vs. superslow resistance training on strength and aerobic capacities in sedentary individuals. J Strength Cond Res 15:309–314PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. MacIntosh BR, Rassier DE (2002) What is fatigue? Can J Appl Physiol 27:42–55PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. McKenzie DK, Gandevia SC (1991) Recovery from fatigue of human diaphragm and limb muscles. Resp Physiol 84:49–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Munn J, Herbert RD, Hancock MJ, Gandevia SC (2005) Resistance training for strength: effect of number of sets and contraction speed. Med Sci Sports Exer 37:1622–1626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ørtenblad N, Sjøgaard G, Madsen K (2000) Impaired sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ release rate after fatiguing stimulation in rat skeletal muscle. J Appl Physiol 89:210–217PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Plaskett CJ, Cafarelli E (2001) Caffeine increases endurance and attenuates force sensation during submaximal isometric contractions. J Appl Physiol 91:1535–1544PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Rooney KJ, Herbert RD, Balnave RJ (1994) Fatigue contributes to the strength training stimulus. Med Sci Sports Exer 26:1160–1164Google Scholar
  22. Schott J, McCully K, Rutherford OM (1995) The role of metabolites in strength training II. Short versus long isometric contractions. Eur J Appl Physiol 71:337–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Schlumberger A, Stec J, Schmidtbleicher D (2001) Single-vs. multiple-set strength training in women. J Strength Cond Res 15:284–289PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Stone MH, O’Bryant HS, Schilling BK, Johnson RL, Pierce KC, Haff GG et al (1999) Periodization: effects of manipulating volume and intensity. Part 1. Strength Cond J 21:56–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Westcott WL, Winett RA, Anderson ES, Wojcik JR, Loud RL, Cleggett E et al (2001) Effects of regular and slow tempo resistance training on muscle strength. J Sports Med Phys Fit 41:154–158Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia
  2. 2.School of Physical EducationUniversity of VictoriaVictoriaCanada
  3. 3.Memorial UniversitySt Johns’Canada

Personalised recommendations