Advertisement

European Journal of Applied Physiology

, Volume 98, Issue 4, pp 363–372 | Cite as

The influence of sampling site and assay method on lactate concentration in response to rock climbing

  • Nick DraperEmail author
  • Simon Brent
  • Beverley Hale
  • Ian Coleman
Original Article

Abstract

The sport of rock climbing has increased in popularity and as a focus for research. Previous studies have examined the physiological determinants for successful performance. Variation is evident between studies over lactate sampling sites and assay methods. The aim of this study was to examine the limits of agreement between the YSI 2300 analyser and the Lactate Pro for finger and ear capillary blood samples in a climbing context. Forty-five (31 males and 14 females) participants volunteered to complete the climbing trial. Blood samples were collected simultaneously from finger and ear pre, post and 5 min post climb. The repeatability results indicated a good agreement across samples. Modelling analysis indicated the use of a −0.175 mmol l−1 adjustment to move from Lactate Pro to YSI finger concentrations. To move from finger to ear concentrations, using the Lactate Pro, modelling analysis suggested a regression equation of Y = 0.827x + 0.769 adjustment for pre climb samples and Y = 0.955x + 0.566 for post climb concentrations. To better understand the physiological demands of climbing further research on natural rock is required. Results from this study suggest the Lactate Pro and blood sampling from the ear lobe could be of benefit to future rock climbing field studies.

Keywords

Rock climbing Lactate concentration Sampling site Assay method Level of agreement 

References

  1. Ahlborg G, Hagenfeldt L, Wahren J (1975) Substrate utilization by the inactive leg during one-leg or arm exercise. J Appl Physiol 39:718–723PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Altman DG, Bland JM (1983) Measurement in medicine: the analysis of method comparison studies. The Statistician 32:307–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. BMC (2004) Annual Report. British Mountaineering Council: ManchesterGoogle Scholar
  4. Billat V, Palleja P, Charlaix T, Rizzardo P, Janel N (1995) Energy specificity of rock climbing and aerobic capacity in competitive sport rock climbers. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 35:20–24PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bishop PA, Smith JF, Kime JC, Mayo JM, Tin YH (1992) Comparison of a manual and an automated enzymatic technique for determining blood lactate concentrations. Int J Sports Med 13:36–39PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bland JM, Altman DG (1986). Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. The Lancet 8476:307–310Google Scholar
  7. Booth J, Marino F, Hill C, Gwinn T (1999) Energy cost of sport rock climbing in elite performers. Br J Sports Med 33:14–18PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. British Standards Institute (1994) Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results. General principles and definitions. BS ISO 5725:1. British Standards Institute, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Carlson LA, Pernow B (1959) Oxygen utilization and lactic acid formation in the legs at rest and during exercise in normal subjects and in patients with arteriosclerosis obliterans. Acta Medica Scandinavica 164:39–52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cole AT (1990). Fingertip injuries in rock climbers. Br J Sports Med 24:14PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Dassonville J, Beillot J, Lessard Y, Jan J, Andre AM, LePourcelet C, Rochcongar P, Carre F (1998) Blood lactate concentrations during exercise: effect of sampling site and exercise mode. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 38:39–46PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Draper N, Bird E, Coleman I, Hodgson C (2006) Effects of active recovery on lactate concentration, heart rate and RPE in climbing. J Sports Sci Med 5:97–105Google Scholar
  13. Feliu J, Ventura JL, Segura R, Rodas G, Riera J, Estruch A, Zamora A, Capdevila L (1999) Differences between lactate concentration of samples from ear lobe and the fingertip. J Physiol Biochem 55:333–340PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Forsyth JJ, Farrally MR (2000). A comparison of lactate concentration in plasma collected from toe, ear, and fingertip after simulated rowing exercise. Br J Sports Med 34:35–38PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Foxdal P, Bergqvist Y, Eckerbom S, Sandhagen B (1992). Improving lactate analysis with the YSI 2300 GL: hemolyzing blood samples makes results comparable with those for deproteinized whole blood. Clin Chem 38:2110–2114PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Gerbert W, Werner I (1999). Blood lactate response to competitive climbing. Communication to the 1st International Conference on Science and Technology in Climbing and Mountaineering, Leeds, UK, AprilGoogle Scholar
  17. Grant S, Hynes V, Whittaker A, Aitchison T (1996). Anthropometric, strength, endurance and flexibility characteristics of elite and recreational climbers. J Sports Sci 14:301–309PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grant S, Hasler T, Davies C, Aitchison TC, Wilson J, Whittaker A (2001) A comparison of the anthropometric, strength, endurance and flexibility characteristics of female elite and recreational climbers and non-climbers. J Sports Sci 19:499–505PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Heller J, Bunc V, Novotny V (1991) Effect of site of capillary blood sampling on lactate concentrations during exercise and recovery. Acta Univ Carol Gymnica 27:29– 38Google Scholar
  20. Hermansen L, Stensvold I (1972). Production and removal of lactate during exercise in man. Acta Physiol Scand 86:191–201PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. MedbØ JI, Mamen A, Holt-Olsen O, Evertsen F (2000) Examination of four different instruments for measuring blood lactate concentration. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 60:367–380PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mermier CM, Robergs RA, Mcminn SM, Heyward VH (1997) Energy expenditure and physiological responses during indoor rock climbing. Br J Sports Med 31:224–228PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mermier CM, Janot JM, Parker DL, Swan JG (2000). Physiological and anthropometric determinants of sport climbing performance. Br J Sports Med 34:359–366PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pyne DB, Boston T, Martin DT, Logan A (2000). Evaluation of the Lactate Pro blood analyser. Eur J Appl Physiol 82:112–116PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Van Hall G, Jensen-Urstad M, Rosdahl H, Holmberg HC, Saltin B, Calbet JAL (2002). Leg and arm lactate and substrate kinetics during exercise. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 284:E193–205PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Watts PB (2004) Physiology of difficult rock climbing. Eur J Appl Physiol 91:361–372PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Watts PB, Drobish KP (1998) Physiological responses to simulated rock climbing at different angles. Med Sci Sports Exerc 30:1118–1122PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Watts PB, Daggett M, Gallagher P, Wilkins B (2000) Metabolic response during sport rock climbing and the effect of active versus passive recovery. Int J Sports Med 21:185–190PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Williams JR, Armstrong N, Kirby BJ (1992) The influence of the site of sampling and assay medium upon the measurement and interpretation of blood lactate responses to exercise. J Sports Sci 10:95–107PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nick Draper
    • 1
    Email author
  • Simon Brent
    • 1
  • Beverley Hale
    • 2
  • Ian Coleman
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Adventure Science ResearchUniversity of ChichesterChichester, West SussexUK
  2. 2.Centre for Sports Science and MedicineUniversity of ChichesterChichesterUK

Personalised recommendations