Advertisement

European Journal of Applied Physiology

, Volume 98, Issue 1, pp 56–61 | Cite as

Physiological responses to nordic walking, walking and jogging

  • Thorsten SchifferEmail author
  • Axel Knicker
  • Uwe Hoffman
  • Brigitte Harwig
  • Wildor Hollmann
  • Heiko K. Strüder
Original Article

Abstract

The goal of this study was to evaluate the physiological responses during incremental field tests (FT) in nordic walking (NW), walking (W) and jogging (J). Fifteen healthy middle-aged women participated in three FT. Heart rate (HR) and oxygen uptake \({\left( {\ifmmode\expandafter\dot\else\expandafter\.\fi{V}{\text{O}}_{2} } \right)} \) were monitored continuously by portable analyzers. Capillary blood lactate (La) was analyzed at rest and after every stage of the FT. The disciplines showed differences during stage 1.8 and 2.1 m s−1 for \( \ifmmode\expandafter\dot\else\expandafter\.\fi{V}{\text{O}}_{2} \) between NW and W (< 0.05). The maximum value was measured at 1.8 m s−1 (8%). In accordance with La, \( \ifmmode\expandafter\dot\else\expandafter\.\fi{V}{\text{CO}}_{2} \) was higher in NW compared with W during all stages (< 0.05) and even higher in NW compared with J during 2.1 and 2.4 m s−1. While there were higher HR for NW and W at 2.4 m s−1 than in J (< 0.01), there were increases for HR at fixed values of 2 (La2) and 4 (La4) mmol l−1 lactate for J compared with NW and W (< 0.01). Although the speed of NW was slower than that of W at La2 and La4 (< 0.05), there were no differences for the HR and the \( \ifmmode\expandafter\dot\else\expandafter\.\fi{V}{\text{O}}_{2} . \) Our results demonstrate that metabolic responses are a helpful instrument to assess the intensity during bipedal exercise. As NW speed at submaximal lactate levels is lower than in W and J, W and J test measures of HR and \( \ifmmode\expandafter\dot\else\expandafter\.\fi{V}{\text{O}}_{2} \) are not suitable for NW training recommendations. Additionally, the \( \ifmmode\expandafter\dot\else\expandafter\.\fi{V}{\text{O}}_{2} \) formed by performing NW is not as high as previously reported.

Keywords

Endurance field test Incremental exercise Oxygen consumption Nordic walking 

References

  1. ACSM written by Pollock ML, Gaesser GA, Butcher JD, Després JP, Dishman RK, Franklin BA, Garber CE (1998) Position stand. The recommended quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory and muscular fitness, and flexibility in healthy adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 30:975–991Google Scholar
  2. Butts NK, Knox KM, Foley TS (1995) Energy costs of walking on a dual-action treadmill in men and women. Med Sci Sports Exerc 27:121–125PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Cavagna GA, Saibene FP, Margaria R (1964) Mechanical work in running. J Appl Physiol 19:249–256PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Church TS, Earnest CP, Morss M (2002) Field testing of physiological responses associated with Nordic Walking. Res Q Exerc Sport 73:296–300PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Di Prampero PE, Pendergast DR, Wilson DW, Rennie DW (1978) Blood lactic acid concentrations in high velocity swimming. In: Eriksson B, Furberg B (eds) Swimming medicine IV. University Park Press, Baltimore, pp 249–261Google Scholar
  6. Doyon KH, Perrey S, Abe D, Hughson RL (2001) Field testing of \( \ifmmode\expandafter\dot\else\expandafter\.\fi{V}{\text{O}}_{2} \) peak in cross-country skiers with portable breath-by-breath system. Can J Appl Physiol 26:1–11Google Scholar
  7. Graves JE, Pollock ML, Montain SJ, Jackson AS, O`Keefe JM (1987) The effect of hand-held weights on the physiological responses to walking exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 19:260–265PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Greiwe JS, Kohrt WM (2000) Energy expenditure during walking and jogging. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 40:297–302PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Heck H, Mader A, Hess G, Mücke S, Müller R, Hollmann W (1985) Justification of the 4-mmol/l lactate threshold. Int J Sports Med. 6:117–130PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hollmann W (1963) Maximal and endurance performance capacity in athletes (German). München, Barth 1963Google Scholar
  11. Johnson MA, Polgar J, Weightman D, Appleton D (1973) Data on the distribution of fibre types in thirty-six human muscles: An autopsy study. J Neurol Sci 18:111–129PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jones AM, Doust JH (1996) A 1% treadmill grade most accurately reflects the energetic cost of outdoor running. J Sports Sci 14:321–327PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lee IM, Paffenbarger RS Jr (1998) Physical activity and stroke incidence: the Harvard alumni health study. Stroke 29:2049–2054PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Margaria R, Cerretelli P, Aghemo P, Sassi G (1963) Energy cost of running. J Appl Physiol 18:367–370PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Meyer T, Welter J-P, Scharhag J, Kindermann W (2003) Maximal oxygen uptake during field running does not exceed that measured during treadmill exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol 88:387–389PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Nigg BM, De Boer RW, Fisher V (1995) A kinematic comparison of overground and treadmill running. Med Sci Sports Exerc 27:98–105PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Pate RR, Pratt M, Blair SN, Haskell WL, Macera CA, Bouchard C, Buchner D, Ettinger W, Heath GW, King AC, Kriska A, Leon AS, Marcus BH, Morris J, Paffenbarger RS Jr, Patrick K, Pollock M, Rippe JM, Sallis J, Wilmore JH (1995) Physical activity and public health: a recommendation from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Sports Medicine. J Am Med Assoc 273:402–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Porcari JP, Hendrickson TL, Walter PR, Terry L, Walsko G (1997) The physiological responses to walking with and without Power PolesTM on treadmill exercise. Res Q Exerc Sport 68:161–166PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Ralston HJ (1958) Energy–speed relation and optimal speed during level walking. Int Z Angew Physiol 17:277–283PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Rippe JM, Ward A, Porcari JP, Freedson PS (1988) Walking for health and fitness. JAMA 259:2720–2724PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rodgers CD, VanHeest JL, Schachter CL (1995) Energy expenditure during submaximal walking with Exerstriders®. Med Sci Sports Exerc 27:607–611PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Saibene F, Minetti AE (2002) Biomechanical and physiological aspects of legged locomotion in humans. Eur J Appl Physiol 88:297–316PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Strömme SB, Ingjer F, Meen HD (1997) Assessment of maximal aerobic power in specifically trained athletes. J Appl Physiol 6:833–837Google Scholar
  24. Susheela AK, Walton JN (1969) Note on the distribution of histochemical fibre types in some normal human muscles: a study on autopsy material. J Neurol Sci 8:201–207PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wank V, Frick U, Schmidtbleicher D (1998) Kinematics and electromyography of lower limb muscles in overground and treadmill running. Int J Sports Med 19:455–461PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Weltman A (1995) The blood lactate response to exercise. Current issues in exercise science. Monograph no. 4. Human Kinetics, ChampaignGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thorsten Schiffer
    • 1
    Email author
  • Axel Knicker
    • 1
  • Uwe Hoffman
    • 2
  • Brigitte Harwig
    • 1
  • Wildor Hollmann
    • 3
  • Heiko K. Strüder
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Motor Control and Movement TechniqueGerman Sport University CologneCologneGermany
  2. 2.Institute of Physiology and AnatomyGerman Sport University CologneCologneGermany
  3. 3.Institute of Cardiology and Sports MedicineGerman Sport University CologneCologneGermany

Personalised recommendations