Advertisement

European Journal of Applied Physiology

, Volume 94, Issue 3, pp 310–316 | Cite as

Applying a mathematical model to training adaptation in a distance runner

  • Rachel Elise WoodEmail author
  • Scott Hayter
  • David Rowbottom
  • Ian Stewart
Original Article

Abstract

This study investigated physiological and psychological correlates of the positive and negative components of a systems model in a well-trained male middle-distance runner. In the systems model, performance at any given point in time is seen as the difference between two antagonistic components, fitness and fatigue, which represent the positive and negative adaptation to training, respectively. Each component comprises a set of parameters unique to the individual, which were estimated by fitting model-predicted performance to performance measured weekly throughout a 12-week training period. The model fitness component was correlated with extrapolated VO2max (ml.kg−1.min−1), running economy (RE) (VO2 at 17 km.h−1), and running speed (km.h-1) at ventilatory threshold (VTRS). The model fatigue component was correlated with the fatigue subset of the profile of mood states (POMS). The fit between model and actual performance was significant (r2=0.92, P< 0.01). In the case of fitness, both VTRS (r=0.94, P=0.0001) and RE (r=−0.61, P=0.04) were significantly correlated with the model fitness component. There was also a moderate correlation between the fatigue subset of the POMS and the fatigue component (r=0.75, p< 0.05). In summary, this is the first time VTRS and the POMS have been used in an attempt to validate the model components. The findings of the present study support previous validation attempts using biochemical and hormonal markers of fitness and fatigue.

Keywords

Mathematical model Adaptation Fitness Fatigue Performance 

References

  1. Banister EW, Hamilton CL (1985) Variations in iron status with fatigue modelled from training in female distance runners. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 54:16–23Google Scholar
  2. Banister EW, Calvert TW, Savage MV, Bach TM (1975) A systems model of training for athletic performance. Aust J Sports Med 7:57–61Google Scholar
  3. Banister EW, Morton RH, Fitz-Clarke J (1992) Dose/response effects of exercise modeled from training: physical and biochemical measures. Ann Physiol Anthropol 11:345–356Google Scholar
  4. Banister EW, Morton RH, Fitz-Clarke J (1996) Clinical dose-response effects of exercise. In: Steinacker JM, Ward SA (eds) The physiology and pathophysiology of exercise tolerance. Plenum Press, New York, pp 297–309Google Scholar
  5. Banister EW, Carter JB, Zarkadas PC (1999) Training theory and taper: validation in triathlon athletes. Eur J Appl Physiol 79:182–191Google Scholar
  6. Bassett DR Jr, Howley ET (2000) Limiting factors for maximum oxygen uptake and determinants of endurance performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc 32:70–84CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Booth FW, Holloszy JO (1977) Cytochrome c turnover in rat skeletal muscles. J Biol Chem 252:416–419Google Scholar
  8. Busso T (2003) Variable dose-response relationship between exercise training and performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc 35:1188–1195Google Scholar
  9. Busso T, Hakkinen K, Pakarinen A, Carasso C, Lacour JR, Komi PV, Kauhanen H (1990) A systems model of training responses and its relationship to hormonal responses in elite weight-lifters. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 61:48–54Google Scholar
  10. Busso T, Carasso C, Lacour JR (1991) Adequacy of a systems structure in the modeling of training effects on performance. J Appl Physiol 71:2044–2049Google Scholar
  11. Busso T, Candau R, Lacour JR (1994) Fatigue and fitness modelled from the effects of training on performance. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 69:50–54Google Scholar
  12. Busso T, Denis C, Bonnefoy R, Geyssant A, Lacour JR (1997) Modeling of adaptations to physical training by using a recursive least squares algorithm. J Appl Physiol 82:1685–1693Google Scholar
  13. Cockerill IM, Nevill AM, Lyons N (1991) Modelling mood states in athletic performance. J Sports Sci 9:205–212Google Scholar
  14. Coyle EF (1999) Physiological determinants of endurance exercise performance. J Sci Med Sport 2:181–189Google Scholar
  15. Fleg JL, Pina IL, Balady GJ, Chaitman BR, Fletcher B, Lavie C, Limacher MC, Stein RA, Williams M, Bazzarre T (2000) Assessment of functional capacity in clinical and research applications: an advisory from the Committee on Exercise, Rehabilitation, and Prevention, Council on Clinical Cardiology, American Heart Association. Circulation 102:1591–1597PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Grant S, Craig I, Wilson J, Aitchison T (1997) The relationship between 3 km running performance and selected physiological variables. J Sports Sci 15:403–10Google Scholar
  17. Hebestreit H, Staschen B, Hebestreit A (2000) Ventilatory threshold: a useful method to determine aerobic fitness in children? Med Sci Sports Exer 32:1964–1969Google Scholar
  18. Hooper S, Mackinnon LT, Hanrahan S (1997) Mood states as an indication of staleness and recovery. Int J Sport Psychol 28:1–12Google Scholar
  19. Liederbach M, Gleim GW, Nicholas JA (1992) Monitoring training status in professional ballet dancers. J Sports Med Phy Fitness 32:187–195Google Scholar
  20. Maffulli N, Capasso G, Lancia A (1991) Anaerobic threshold and performance in middle and long distance running. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 31:332–338Google Scholar
  21. Martin A, Andersen MB, Gates W (2000) Using the Profile of Mood States (POMS) to monitor high-intensity training in cyclists: group versus case studies. Sport Psychol 14:138–156Google Scholar
  22. Morton RH (1997) Modeling training and overtraining. J Sports Sci 15:335–340Google Scholar
  23. Morton RH, Fitz-Clarke JR, Banister EW (1990) Modeling human performance in running. J Appl Physiol 69:1171–1177Google Scholar
  24. Mujika I, Busso T, Lacoste L, Barale F, Geyssant A, Chatard JC (1996) Modeled responses to training and taper in competitive swimmers. Med Sci Sports Exerc 28:251–258Google Scholar
  25. Raglin JS, Morgan WP (1994) Development of a scale for use in monitoring training-induced distress in athletes. Int J Sports Med 15:84–88Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rachel Elise Wood
    • 1
    Email author
  • Scott Hayter
    • 1
  • David Rowbottom
    • 1
  • Ian Stewart
    • 1
  1. 1.Queensland University of TechnologyKelvin GroveAustralia

Personalised recommendations