European Journal of Applied Physiology

, Volume 94, Issue 1–2, pp 158–167 | Cite as

A comparison of muscular activity during single and double mouse clicks

Original Article

Abstract

Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) in the neck/shoulder region and the upper extremities are a common problem among computer workers. Occurrences of motor unit (MU) double discharges with very short inter-firing intervals (doublets) have been hypothesised as a potential additional risk for overuse of already exhausted fibres during long-term stereotyped activity. Doublets are reported to be present during double-click mouse work tasks. A few comparative studies have been carried out on overall muscle activities for short-term tasks with single types of actions, but none on occurrences of doublets during double versus single clicks. The main purpose of this study was to compare muscle activity levels of single and double mouse clicks during a long-term combined mouse/keyboard work task. Four muscles were studied: left and right upper trapezius, right extensor digitorum communis (EDC) and right flexor carpi ulnaris. Additionally, MU activity was analysed through intramuscular electromyography in the EDC muscle for a selection of subjects. The results indicate that double clicking produces neither higher median or 90th percentile levels in the trapezius and EDC muscles, nor a higher disposition for MU doublets, than does single clicking. Especially for the 90th percentile levels, the indications are rather the opposite (in the EDC significantly higher during single clicks in 8 of 11 subjects, P<0.05). Although it cannot be concluded from the present study that double clicks are harmless, there were no signs that double clicks during computer work generally constitute a larger risk factor for WMSDs than do single clicks.

Keywords

Computer mouse Muscle activity Motor units Doublets 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge Dr. Quixia Zhang for invaluable support during the iEMG recordings and Professor Roland Kadefors for fruitful discussions. This work was supported by the Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research.

References

  1. Aarås A, Ro O (1997) Workload when using a mouse as an input device. Int J Hum Comp Interact 9(2):105–118Google Scholar
  2. Abbate F, Bruton JD, De Haan A, Westerblad H (2002) Prolonged force increase following a high-frequency burst is not due to a sustained elevation of [Ca2+]i. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 283:C42–C47Google Scholar
  3. Bawa P, Calancie B (1983) Repetitive doublets in human flexor carpi radialis muscle. J Phys [E] 339:123–132Google Scholar
  4. Bernard BP, Putz-Anderson V, Burt SE, Cole LL, Fairfield-Estill C, Fine LJ, Grant KA, Gjessing C, Jenkins L, Hurrell JJ, Nelson N, Pfirman D, Roberts R, Stetson D, Haring-Sweeney M, Tanaka S (1997) In: Bernard BP (ed) Musculoskeletal disorders and workplace factors. A critical review of epidemiologic evidence for work-related musculoskeletal disorders of the neck, upper extremity, and low back. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/pdfs/97–141.pdf. DHHS (NIOSH) Publ No 97–141, chap 2Google Scholar
  5. Birch L, Juul-Kristensen B, Jensen C, Finsen L, Christensen H (2000) Acute response to precision, time pressure and mental demand during simulated computer work. Scand J Work Environ Health 26(4):299–305Google Scholar
  6. Blangsted AK, Olsen HB, Søgaard K (2001) Motor unit firing behaviour in human trapezius muscle during double clicking of computer mouse. In: Movement and sensation, International Symposium, Cairns, 3–6 September 2001Google Scholar
  7. Blatter BM, Bongers PM (2002) Duration of computer use and mouse use in relation to musculoskeletal disorders of neck or upper limb. Int J Ind Ergonom 30(4):295–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. BLS—Bureau of Labor Statistics/U.S. Department of Labor (1999) Occupational injuries and illnesses: industry data. Available at: http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/osh/case/ostb0911.pdf
  9. Broberg E, Bastin M (2002) Arbetsmiljön 2001. In: Öberg S (ed) Sveriges officiella statistik, Statistiska meddelanden. ISSN 0082–0237, AM 68 SM 0201. Available at: http://www.av.se/statistik/dok/0000173.pdf. Arbetsmiljöverket/Statistiska Centralbyrån, pp 49–50
  10. Cutsem M van , Duchateau J, Hainaut K (1998) Changes in single motor unit behaviour contribute to the increase in contraction speed after dynamic training in humans. J Phys [E] 513(1):295–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Denslow JS (1948) Double discharges in human motor units. J Neurophysiol 11:209–215Google Scholar
  12. Desmedt JE, Godaux E (1977) Ballistic contractions in man: characteristic recruitment pattern of single motor units of the tibialis anterior muscle. J Phys [E] 264:673–693Google Scholar
  13. Fogleman M, Lewis RJ (2002) Factors associated with self-reported musculoskeletal discomfort in video display terminal (VDT) users. Int J Ind Ergonom 29:311–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Forsman M, Kadefors R, Zhang Q, Birch L, Palmerud G (1999) Motor-unit recruitment in the trapezius muscle during arm movements and in VDU precision work. Int J Ind Ergonom 24:619–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Forsman M, Birch L, Zhang Q, Kadefors R (2001) Motor-unit recruitment in the trapezius muscle with special reference to coarse arm movements. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 11:207–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Forsman M, Taoda K, Thorn S, Zhang Q (2002) Motor-unit recruitment during long-term isometric and wrist motion contractions: a study concerning muscular pain development in computer operators. Int J Ind Ergonom 30(4–5):237–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Freriks B, Hermens H, Disselhorst-Klug C, Rau G (1999) The recommendations for sensors and sensor placement procedures for surface electromyography. In: Hermens H, Freriks B, Merletti R, Stegeman D, Blok J, Rau G, Disselhorst-Klug C and Hägg G (eds) SENIAM—deliverable 8—European recommendations for surface electromyography. Roessingh Research and Development, Enschede, pp 15–54Google Scholar
  18. Garland SJ, Griffin L (1999) Motor unit double discharges: statistical anomaly or functional entity? Can J Appl Physiol 24(2):113–130Google Scholar
  19. Gerr F, Marcus M, Ensor C, Kleinbaum D, Cohen S, Edwards A, Gentry E, Ortiz DJ, Monteilh C (2002) A prospective study of computer users. 1. Study design and incidence of musculoskeletal symptoms and disorders. Am J Ind Med 41:221–235CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Griffin L, Garland SJ, Ivanova T (1998) Discharge patterns in human motor units during fatiguing arm movements. J Appl Physiol 85(5):1684–1692Google Scholar
  21. Gustafsson E, Hagberg M (2003) Computer mouse ue in two different hand positions: exposure, comfort, exertion and productivity. Int J Ind Ergonom 34:107–113Google Scholar
  22. Hägg GM (1991) Static work loads and occupational myalgia—a new explanation model. In: Anderson P A, Hobart DJ, Danoff JV (eds) Electromyographical kinesiology. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 141–143Google Scholar
  23. Henneman E, Somjen G, Carpenter DO (1965) Excitability and inhibitability of motoneurons of different sizes. J Neurophysiol 28:599–620PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Jensen C, Borg V, Finsen L, Hansen K, Juul-Kristensen B, Christensen H (1998) Job demands, muscle activity and musculoskeletal symptoms in relation to work with the computer mouse. Scand J Work Environ Health 24(5):418–424Google Scholar
  25. Jensen C, Finsen L, Hansen K, Christensen H (1999) Upper trapezius muscle activity patterns during repetitive manual material handling and work with a computer mouse. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 9:317–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Johnson P, McLoone H, Adams E, Arms S (2000a) Developing miniature force-sensing technologies for measuring the forces applied to a computer mouse. In: Proceedings of the 44th annual meeting of the human factors and Ergonomics society, vol 6. HFES, Santa Monica, pp 629–632Google Scholar
  27. Johnson PW, Hagberg M, Wigaeus Hjelm E, Rempel D (2000b) Measuring and characterizing force exposures during computer mouse use. Scand J Work Environ Health 26(5):398–405Google Scholar
  28. Juul-Kristensen B, Kadefors R, Hansen K, Byström P, Sandsjö L, Sjøgaard G (2004) Clinical signs and physical function in neck and upper extremeties among elderly female computer users. The NEW-study. Eur J Appl Physiol (in press)Google Scholar
  29. Kadefors R, Läubli T (2002) Muscular disorders in computer users: introduction. Int J Ind Ergonom 30(4–5):203–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Keen DA, Fuglevand AJ (2004) Distribution of motor unit force in human extensor digitorum assessed by spike-triggered averaging and intraneural microstimulation. J Neurophysiol 91:2515–2523Google Scholar
  31. Kominski R, Newburger E (1999) Access denied: Changes in computer ownership and use, 1984–1997. In: Annual meeting of the American Sociological Association. Chicago, pp 1–34. Available at: http://www.census.gov/population/socdemo/computer/confpap99.pdf
  32. Kudina LP, Alexeeva NL (1992) Repetitive doublets of human motoneurones: analysis of interspike intervals and recruitment pattern. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 85:243–247Google Scholar
  33. Laursen B, Jensen BR (2000) Shoulder muscle activity in young and older people during a computer mouse task. Clin Biomech 15(1):S30–S33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Laursen B, Jensen BR, Ratkevicius A (2001) Performance and muscle activity during computer mouse tasks in young and elderly adults. Eur J Appl Physiol 84:329–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ljung B-O, Lieber RL, Fridén J (1999) Wrist extensor muscle pathology in lateral epicondylitis. J Hand Surg [Br] 24B(2):177–183Google Scholar
  36. Mathiassen SE, Winkel J, Hägg GM (1995) Normalization of surface EMG amplitude from the upper trapezius muscle in ergonomic studies—a review. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 5(4):197–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mogk JPM, Keir PJ (2003) Crosstalk in surface electromyography of the proximal forearm during gripping tasks. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 13:63–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Moore KL (1985) The forearm of antebrachium. In: Clinically oriented anatomy, vol 2. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 691–733Google Scholar
  39. Öberg S, Åström L (2000) Working environment for employed persons, by gender and age, per cent. Statistical yearbook of Sweden 2001. Also available at: http://www.scb.se/publkat/allman/arbetsmarknad.pdf, vol. 87, Statistics Sweden. Publication Services, Örebro pp 241–244
  40. Olsen HB, Blangsted AK, Søgaard K (2001) Motor unit firing behaviour in human trapezius muscle during double clicking of computer mouse. In: Sandsjö L, Kadefors R (eds) The 2nd PROCID symposium, prevention of muscle disorders in computer users: scientific basis and recommendations. National Institute for Working Life/West, Göteborg, pp 233–239Google Scholar
  41. Olsen HB, Sjøgaard G, Farina D, Søgaard K (2002) Motor unit firing pattern during double and single clicking on a computer mouse. In: Kollmitzer J, Bijak M (eds) Standardization for better exchange of ideas. Proceedings of the 14th Congress of the International Society of Electrophysiology and Kinesiology. University of Vienna, Vienna, pp 321–322Google Scholar
  42. Partanen VSJ, Lang AH (1978) An analysis of double discharges in the human elecromyogram. J Neurol Sci 36:363–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ranney D, Wells R, Moore A (1995) Upper limb musculoskeletal disorders in highly repetitive industries: precise anatomical physical findings. Ergonomics 38(7):1408–1423PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Schnoz M, Läubli T, Weiss JA, Krueger H (1999) Activation of the finger and trapezius muscles in repetitive, short and long term finger movements. Z Arbeitswiss 53(2):131–138Google Scholar
  45. Sjøgaard G, Søgaard K, Finsen L, Olsen HB, Christensen H (2001) Doublets in motor unit activity of human forearm muscle during simulated computer work. Acta Physiol Pharmacol Bulg 26:83–85Google Scholar
  46. Søgaard K, Sjøgaard G, Finsen L, Olsen HB, Christensen H (2001) Motor unit activity during stereotyped finger tasks and computer mouse work. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 11:197–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Thorn S, Forsman M, Zhang Q, Hallbeck S (2002a) Motor unit firing pattern in the trapezius muscle during long-term computer work. In: Kollmitzer J, Bijak M (eds) Standardization for a better exchange of ideas. Proceedings of the 14th Congress of the International Society of Electrophysiology and Kinesiology. University of Vienna, Vienna, pp 34–35Google Scholar
  48. Thorn S, Forsman M, Zhang Q, Taoda K (2002b) Low-threshold motor unit activity during a 1-h static contraction in the trapezius muscle. Int J Ind Ergonom 30(4–5):225–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Waersted M, Eken T, Westgaard RH (1996) Activity of single motor units in attention-demanding tasks: firing pattern in the human trapezius muscle. Eur J Appl Physiol 72:323–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wigaeus Tornqvist E, Eriksson N, Bergqvist U (2000) Dator- och kontorsarbetsplatsens fysiska och psykosociala arbetsmiljörisker. In: Marklund S (ed) Arbetsliv och hälsa. Arbetslivsinstitutet, Stockholm, pp 235–260Google Scholar
  51. Zennaro D, Läubli T, Krebs D, Klipstein A, Krueger H (2003) Continuous, intermitted and sporadic motor unit activity in the trapezius muscle during prolonged computer work. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 13:113–124CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stefan Thorn
    • 1
    • 2
  • Mikael Forsman
    • 1
    • 2
  • Susan Hallbeck
    • 3
  1. 1.National Institute for Working LifeGoteborgSweden
  2. 2.Department of Product and Production Development/Human Factors EngineeringChalmers University of TechnologyGoteborgSweden
  3. 3.Department of Industrial and Management Systems EngineeringUniversity of NebraskaLincolnUSA

Personalised recommendations