Power output of the lower limb during variable inertial loading: a comparison between methods using single and repeated contractions
- 124 Downloads
The power–inertial load relationship of the lower limb muscles was studied during a single leg thrust using the Modified Nottingham Power Rig (mNPR) and during cycling exercise in nine young male subjects. The relationship between peak power and inertial load showed a parabolic-like relationship for mNPR exertions, with a peak [937 (SD 246) W] at 0.158 kg m2, this being significantly (P <0.05) different from the power generated at both the lowest [723 (162) W] and highest [756 (206) W] inertial loads. In contrast, for cycling exercise power output did not differ significantly between inertial loads, except at the lowest inertia where power output was significantly (P<0.05) less compared with all other inertial loads. Maximum peak power output during cycling was 1,620 (336) W, which was significantly (P <0.05) greater than that recorded on the mNPR. However, a close association was observed between the mean power generated by each method (r=0.84, P<0.05). The results suggest that during a single contraction a range of inertial loads is required to allow peak power to be expressed. Above a certain critical value, this is unnecessary during cycling movements where the load can be repeatedly accelerated.
KeywordsMuscle Power Exercise
This work was supported by the Wellcome Trust: The technical assistance of Alan Snook, Phil Oliver and Apostolos Galantis is gratefully acknowledged. All work carried out complies with the law of the UK.
- Aagaard P, Simonsen EB, Trolle M, Bangsbo J, Klausen K (1994) Moment and power generation during maximal knee extensions performed at high and low speeds. Eur J Appl Physiol 69:376–381Google Scholar
- Bassey EJ, Short AH (1990) A new method for measuring power output in a single leg extension: feasibility, reliability and validity. Eur J Appl Physiol 60:385–390Google Scholar
- Davies CT, Young K (1983) Effect of temperature on the contractile properties and muscle power of triceps surae in humans. J Appl Physiol 55:191–195Google Scholar
- Dietz V, Noth J (1978) Spinal stretch reflexes of triceps surae in active and passive movements (proceedings). J Physiol (Lond) 284:180P-181PGoogle Scholar
- Faria IE, Cavanaugh PR (1978) The physiology and biomechanics of cycling. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Hawkins D, Hull ML (1990) A method for determining lower extremity muscle-tendon lengths during flexion/extension movements. J Biomech 23 487–494Google Scholar
- Hill AV (1938) The heat of shortening and the dynamic constants of muscle. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B126:136–195Google Scholar
- McCartney N, Heigenhauser GJ, Jones NL (1983) Power output and fatigue of human muscle in maximal cycling exercise. J Appl Physiol 55:218–224Google Scholar
- Sargeant AJ, Hoinville E, Young A (1981) Maximum leg force and power output during short term dynamic exercise. J Appl Physiol 51:1175–1182Google Scholar