European Journal of Applied Physiology

, Volume 91, Issue 2–3, pp 253–258 | Cite as

The effect of physical and psychosocial loads on the trapezius muscle activity during computer keying tasks and rest periods

  • Anne Katrine Blangsted
  • Karen Søgaard
  • Hanne Christensen
  • Gisela Sjøgaard
Original Article


The overall aim was to investigate the effect of psychosocial loads on trapezius muscle activity during computer keying work and during short and long breaks. In 12 female subjects, surface electromyography (EMG) was recorded bilaterally from the upper trapezius muscle during a standardized one hand keying task—interspaced with short (30 s) and long (4 min) breaks—in sessions with and without a combination of cognitive and emotional stressors. Adding psychosocial loads to the same physical work did not increase the activity of the trapezius muscle on either the keying or the control side, both of which remained at median and static EMG activity levels of around 5% and 2.5% of the maximal voluntary electrical activity (EMGmax), respectively. The difference between the keying and the control side was significant; and further the control side activity was significantly increased above resting level. During both short and long breaks, exposure to psychosocial loads also did not increase the activity of the trapezius muscle either on the side of the keying or the control hand. Of note is that during long breaks the muscle activity of the keying side as well as that of the control side remained at the same level as during the short breaks, which was increased above resting level. This was to be seen from the static and the median EMG activity levels as well as gap times, the overall mean values being: 0.4%EMGmax, 1.1%EMGmax, and 50% in gap time, respectively. In conclusion: psychosocial loads are not solely responsible for increased non-postural muscle activity; and increasing the duration of breaks does not per se cause muscle relaxation.


Electromyography Contra lateral Mental stressors 



This work was undertaken as an activity within the project, “Prevention of muscle disorders in operation of computer input devices (PROCID)”, a Concerted Action financed under the European Union research program BIOMED-2 (BHM-98-3903).


  1. Ariens GA, van Mechelen W, Bongers PM, Bouter LM, van der Wal G (2001) Psychosocial risk factors for neck pain: A systematic review. Am J Ind Med 39:180–193CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bernard B (ed) (1997) Musculoskeletal disorders and workplace factors: A critical review of epidemiologic evidence for work-related musculoskeletal disorders of the neck, upper extremity, and low back. US Department of Health and Human Services, NIOSH, Cincinnati, USAGoogle Scholar
  3. Bongers PM, de Winter CR, Kompier MAJ, Hildebrandt VH (1993) Psychosocial factors at work and musculoskeletal disease. Scand J Work Environ Health 19:297–312PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Borg GAV (1982) Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc 14:377–381PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. DeToledo JC, David NJ (2001) Innervation of the sternocleidomastoid and trapezius muscles by the accessory nucleus. J Neuroophthalmol 21:214–216PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Finsen L, Søgaard K, Christensen H (2001) Influence of memory demand and contra lateral activity on muscle activity. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 11:373–380CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Hägg GM (1991) Static work loads and occupational myalgia—a new explanation model. In: Anderson PA, Hobart DJ, Danoff JV (eds) Electromyographical kinesiology. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 141–144Google Scholar
  8. Hägg GM, Åström A (1997) Load pattern and pressure pain threshold in the upper trapezius muscle and psychosocial factors in medical secretaries with and without shoulder/neck disorders. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 69:423–432PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Jensen C (2003) Development of neck and hand–wrist symptoms in relation to duration of computer use at work. Scand J Work Environ Health 29:197–205PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Jensen C, Ryholt CU, Burr H, Villadsen E, Christensen H (2002) Work-related psychosocial, physical and individual factors associated with musculoskeletal symptoms in computer users. Work Stress 16:107–120Google Scholar
  11. Johnson JV, Hall EM (1988) Job strain, work place social support, and cardiovascular disease: a cross-sectional study of a random sample of the Swedish working population. Am J Public Health 78:1336–1342PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Jonsson B (1982) Measurement and evaluation of local muscular strain in the shoulder during constrained work. J Hum Ergol (Tokyo) 11:73–88Google Scholar
  13. Karasek R (1979) Job demands, job decision laitude, and mental strain: implications for job redesign. Adm Sci Q 24:285–307Google Scholar
  14. Kierner AC, Zelenka I, Burian M (2001) How do the cervical plexus and the spinal accessory nerve contribute to the innervation of the trapezius muscle? As seen from within using Sihler’s stain. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 127:1230–1232PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Laursen B, Jensen BR, Németh G, Sjøgaard G (1998a) A model predicting individual shoulder muscle forces based on relationship between EMG and 3D external forces in static position. J Biomech 31:731–739CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Laursen B, Jensen BR, Sjøgaard G (1998b) Effect of speed and precision demands on human shoulder muscle electromyography during a repetitive task. Eur J Appl Physiol 78:544–548Google Scholar
  17. Laursen B, Jensen BR, Garde AH, Jørgensen AH (2002) Effect of mental and physical demands on muscular activity during the use of a computer mouse and a keyboard. Scand J Work Environ Health 28:215–221PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Lundberg U, Kadefors R, Melin B, Palmerud G, Hassmén P, Engström M, Dohns IE (1994) Psychophysiological stress and EMG activity of the trapezius muscle. Int J Behav Med 1:354–370Google Scholar
  19. McNulty WH, Gevirtz RN, Hubbard DR, Berkoff GM (1994) Needle electromyographic evaluation of trigger point response to a psychological stressor. Psychophysiology 31:313–316PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Nilsson L, Bäckman L, Erngrund K, Nyberg L, Adolfsson R, Burcht G, Karlsson S, Widing M, Winblad B (1997) The Betula Prospective Cohort Study: Memory, Health, and Aging. Aging Neuropsychol Cognition 4:1–32Google Scholar
  21. Palmerud G, Kadefors R, Sporrong H, Järvholm U, Herberts P, Högfors C, Peterson B (1995) Voluntary redistribution of muscle activity in human shoulder muscles. Ergonomics 38:806–815PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Punnett L, Bergqvist U (1997) National institute for working life—ergonomic expert committee document no. 1. In: Kjellberg A (ed) Visual display unit work and upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders. A review of epidemiological findings. National Institute for Working Life, Solna, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  23. Rissén D, Melin B, Sandsjo L, Dohns I, Lundberg U (2000) Surface EMG and psychophysiological stress reactions in women during repetitive work. Eur J Appl Physiol 83:215–222Google Scholar
  24. Siegrist J (1996) Adverse health effects of high-effort/low-reward conditions. J Occup Health Psychol 1:27–41CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Sjøgaard G, Lundberg U, Kadefors R (2000) The role of muscle activity and mental load in the development of pain and degenerative processes at the muscle cell level during computer work. Eur J Appl Physiol 83:99–105Google Scholar
  26. Søgaard K, Sjøgaard G, Finsen L, Olsen HB, Christensen H (2001) Motor unit activity during stereotyped finger tasks and computer mouse work. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 11:197–206CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Veiersted KB, Westgaard RH, Andersen P (1990) Pattern of muscle activity during stereotyped work and its relation to muscle pain. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 62:31–41PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Veiersted KB, Westgaard RH, Andersen P (1993) Electromyographic evaluation of muscular work pattern as a predictor of trapezius myalgia. Scand J Work Environ Health 19:284–290PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Wahlström J, Hagberg M, Johnson PW, Svensson J, Rempel D (2002) Influence of time pressure and verbal provocation on physiological and psychological reactions during work with a computer mouse. Eur J Appl Physiol 87:257–263Google Scholar
  30. Waersted M, Westgaard RH (1996) Attention-related muscle activity in different body regions during VDU work with minimal physical activity. Ergonomics 39:661–676PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Waersted M, Eken T, Westgaard RH (1996) Activity of single motor unit in attention-demanding tasks: firing pattern in the human trapezius muscle. Eur J Appl Physiol 72:323–329Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anne Katrine Blangsted
    • 1
  • Karen Søgaard
    • 1
  • Hanne Christensen
    • 1
  • Gisela Sjøgaard
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhysiologyNational Institute of Occupational HealthCopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations