Advertisement

European Journal of Applied Physiology

, Volume 90, Issue 5–6, pp 549–553 | Cite as

Region-specific differences in Achilles tendon cross-sectional area in runners and non-runners

  • S. Peter MagnussonEmail author
  • Michael Kjaer
Original Article

Abstract

The present study examined the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the Achilles tendon in subjects who repeatedly exposed their tendons to large loads (habitual runners) compared to control subjects (non-runners). Six male habitual runners [36 (7) years, 70.9 (4.4) kg and 1.84 (0.05) m, ±SD] who had performed distance running (~80 km per week) for the last 5 years were compared to six non-runners [34 (3) years, 81.2 (8.7) kg and 1.81 (0.02) m, ±SD]. Tendon CSA was obtained from MR images obtained with the ankle in a neutral position (90°). The most proximal aspect of the tuberosity of calcaneus was used as a landmark to standardize the levels of images: the most distal image (1) was obtained 10 mm above the proximal tuberosity of calcaneus, and the most proximal image (7) was obtained 70 mm above the proximal tuberosity of calcaneus. There was a significant difference in CSA along the length of the tendon both in runners (P<0.001) and non-runners (P<0.01). In non-runners and runners the CSA of the most distal part was 51% and 85% greater than the most proximal part of the tendon, respectively. Furthermore, there was a difference in tendon CSA between the groups, such that runners had a greater CSA (36%) than non-runners at the most distal part of the tendon (P<0.05). The greater CSA in the distal tendon may reflect differences in structural properties along the length of the human Achilles tendon, while the greater CSA in runners compared to non-runners may indicate a region-specific hypertrophy in response to the habitual loading of running.

Keywords

Hypertrophy Safety factor Stress Tendon Training 

References

  1. Birch HL, McLaughlin L, Smith RK, Goodship AE (1999) Treadmill exercise-induced tendon hypertrophy: assessment of tendons with different mechanical functions. Equine Vet J Suppl 30:222–226PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Buchanan CI, Marsh RL (2001) Effects of long-term exercise on the biomechanical properties of the Achilles tendon of guinea fowl. J Appl Physiol 90:164–171PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Evanko SP, Vogel KG (1993) Proteoglycan synthesis in fetal tendon is differentially regulated by cyclic compression in vitro. Arch Biochem Biophys 307:153–164PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Finni T, Komi PV, Lukkariniemi J (1900) Achilles tendon loading during walking: application of a novel optic fiber technique. Eur J Appl Physiol 77:289–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fukashiro S, Komi PV, Jarvinen M, Miyashita M (1995) In vivo Achilles tendon loading during jumping in humans. Eur J Appl Physiol 71:453–458Google Scholar
  6. Giddings VL, Beaupre GS, Whalen RT, Carter DR (2000) Calcaneal loading during walking and running. Med Sci Sports Exerc 32:627–634PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Jarvinen M (1992) Epidemiology of tendon injuries in sports. Clin Sports Med 11:493–504Google Scholar
  8. Jozsa L, Reffy A, Balint JB (1984) Polarization and electron microscopic studies on the collagen of intact and ruptured human tendons. Acta Histochem 74:209–215PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Kallinen M, Suominen H (1994) Ultrasonographic measurements of the Achilles tendon in elderly athletes and sedentary men. Acta Radiol 35:560–563PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Kannus P, Jozsa L (1991) Histopathological changes preceding spontaneous rupture of a tendon. A controlled study of 891 patients. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 73:1507–1525Google Scholar
  11. Ker RF, Alexander RM, Bennett MB (1988) Why are mammalian tendons so thick. J Zool 216:309–324Google Scholar
  12. Langberg H, Skovgaard D, Petersen LJ, Bulow J, Kjaer M (1999) Type I collagen synthesis and degradation in peritendinous tissue after exercise determined by microdialysis in humans. J Physiol (Lond) 521:299–306Google Scholar
  13. Langberg H, Skovgaard D, Asp S, Kjaer M (2000) Time pattern of exercise-induced changes in type I collagen turnover after prolonged endurance exercise in humans. Calcif Tissue Int 67:41–44CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Langberg H, Rosendal L, Kjaer M (2001) Training-induced changes in peritendinous type I collagen turnover determined by microdialysis in humans. J Physiol (Lond) 534:297–302Google Scholar
  15. Maffulli N, Waterston SW, Squair J, Reaper J, Douglas AS (1999) Changing incidence of Achilles tendon rupture in Scotland: a 15-year study. Clin J Sport Med 9:157–160PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Magnusson SP, Aagaard P, Rosager S, Dyhre-Pouelsen P, Kjaer M (2001) Load-displacement properties of the human triceps surae aponeurosis in vivo. J Physiol (Lond) 531:277–288Google Scholar
  17. Magnusson SP, Qvortrup K, Larsen JO, Rosager S, Hanson P, Aagaard P, Krogsgaard M, Kjaer M (2002) Collagen fibril size and crimp morphology in ruptured and intact Achilles tendons. Matrix Biol 21:369–377CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Magnusson SP, Beyer N, Abrahamsen H, Aagaard P, Neergaard K, Kjaer M (2003) Increased cross-sectional area and reduced tensile stress of the Achilles tendon in elderly compared to young women. J Gerontol Biol Sci 58:B123–B127Google Scholar
  19. Malaviya P, Butler DL, Boivin GP, Smith FN, Barry FP, Murphy JM, Vogel KG (2000) An in vivo model for load-modulated remodeling in the rabbit flexor tendon. J Orthop Res 18:116–125PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Milz S, Rufai A, Buettner A, Putz R, Ralphs JR, Benjamin M (2002) Three-dimensional reconstructions of the Achilles tendon insertion in man. J Anat 200:145–152CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Moore KL (1980) Clinically oriented anatomy.Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, 501 ppGoogle Scholar
  22. Robbins JR, Evanko SP, Vogel KG (1997) Mechanical loading and TGF-beta regulate proteoglycan synthesis in tendon. Arch Biochem Biophys 342:203–211CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Rosager S, Aagaard P, Dyhre-Poulsen P, Neergaard K, Kjaer M, Magnusson SP (2002) Load-displacement properties of the human triceps surae aponeurosis and tendon in runners and non-runners. Scand J Med Sci Sports 12:90–98CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Sarrafian SK (1983) Foot and ankle. Lippincott, Philadelphia, 249 ppGoogle Scholar
  25. Scott SH, Winter DA (1990) Internal forces of chronic running injury sites. Med Sci Sports Exerc 22:357–369PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Sommer HM (1987) The biomechanical and metabolic effects of a running regime on the Achilles tendon in the rat. Int Orthop 11:71–75PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Woo SL, Ritter MA, Amiel D, Sanders TM, Gomez MA, Kuei SC, Garfin SR, Akeson WH (1980) The biomechanical and biochemical properties of swine tendons--long term effects of exercise on the digital extensors. Connect Tissue Res 7:177–183PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Woo SL, Gomez MA, Woo YK, Akeson WH (1982) Mechanical properties of tendon and ligaments. The relationship of immobilization and exercise on tissue remodeling. Biorheology 19:397–408PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Wren TA, Yerby SA, Beaupre GS, Carter DR (2001) Mechanical properties of the human Achilles tendon. Clin Biomech 16:245–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Viidik A (1967) The effect of training on the tensile strength of isolated rabbit tendons. Scand J Plastic Reconstr Surg 1:141–147Google Scholar
  31. Viidik A (1969) Tensile strength properties of Achilles tendon systems in trained and untrained rabbits. Acta Orthop Scand 40:261–272PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sports Medicine Research UnitBispebjerg HospitalCopenhagen Denmark
  2. 2.Sports Medicine Research UnitBispebjerg HospitalCopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations