Enhancing medical evaluations of sick-listed employees: an educational intervention to improve professional practice of physicians performing work ability assessments of employees on long-term sick leave
- 8 Downloads
Long-term sick leave (LTSL) is a complex phenomenon. Medical and non-medical factors can delay return-to-work (RTW); therefore, the assessment of work ability is complicated. A checklist for identifying factors associated with delayed RTW was developed in a prior study to facilitate the exploration of barriers and facilitators for RTW. The purpose of the present study was to determine if use of the checklist enhances professional practice of physicians performing work ability assessments of employees on long-term sick leave and whether the reporting of work ability assessments improved when using the checklist in the routinely practice-based context.
An educational intervention study was performed using qualitative framework analysis. Thirty-five Dutch physicians were asked to identify and report the barriers and facilitators for RTW and the consequences for the work ability and for the prognosis regarding work reintegration using the checklist. A pre-post qualitative analysis of the medical records was performed using a gradual classification of the reporting of the work ability to evaluate the change in reporting following the educational intervention.
A total of 337 work ability assessments were performed using the checklist. The identification of factors influencing RTW and the comprehensiveness of the medical records increased when compared with the reporting before the educational intervention. The reporting of the work ability assessments improved after the educational intervention. Most physicians reported at least one of the factors of the checklist. 72% participants reported and described adequately at least one factor. 48% participants reported how the factors influenced the work ability, 20% participants reported how the factors influenced the prognosis regarding RTW and 12% participants reported which advice was provided by the physician to influence the barriers for RTW.
Use of the checklist enhances professional practice of physicians performing work ability assessments of employees on long-term sick leave and is associated with increased identification of barriers and facilitators for RTW. The use of the checklist should be considered to improve professional practice of physicians performing work ability assessments.
KeywordsWork ability assessment Long-term sick leave Checklist Return to work Factors Educational intervention
PMD-S: conception and design, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, writing the manuscript, revising it critically for important intellectual content, final approval of the version to be published. AW: acquisition of data, qualitative analysis of data, revising it critically for important intellectual content, final approval of the version to be published.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare they have no conflict of interests.
The present study has been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.
- Alexanderson K, Norlund A (2004) Sickness absence—causes, consequences, and physicians’ sickness certification practice. A systematic literature review by the Swedish Council in Technology Assessment in Health Care. Scand J Public Health 63:3–263Google Scholar
- Blum F, Burton JF (2006) Workers’ compensation costs in 2005: regional, industrial, and other variations. Work Compens Policy Rev 6:3–20Google Scholar
- Gawande A (2009) The checklist manifesto: how to get things right. Metropolitan Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Gibbs LE (2003) Evidence-based practice for the helping professions: a practical guide to integrated multimedia. Brooks/Cole, Pacific GroveGoogle Scholar
- Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I, Milne R, Perera R, Moher D, Altman DG, Barbour V, Macdonald H, Johnston M, Lamb SE, Dixon-Woods M, McCulloch P, Wyatt JC, Chan A, Michie S (2014) Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ 348:g1687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kostoupoulos G, Rizomyliotis I, Konstantoulaki K (2015) Determinants of physicians ‘purchase intention for innovative services: integrating professional characteristics with technology acceptance model and theory of planned behaviour. Int J Innov Manag 19:02Google Scholar
- Lerner D, Amick BC, Lee JC (2003) Relationship of employee-reported work limitations to work productivity. Med Care 41:649–659Google Scholar
- Logan JR, Gorman PN, Middleton B (2001) Measuring the quality of medical records: a method for comparing completeness and correctness of clinical encounter data. Proc AMIA Symp 408–412Google Scholar
- McGinlay D, Moore D, Mironescu A (2015) A prospective observational assessment of surgical safety checklist use in Brasov Children’s Hospital, barriers to implementation and methods to improve compliance. Rom J Anaesth Intensive Care 22(2):111–121Google Scholar
- Mullen EJ, Bacon W (2004) A survey of practitioner adoption and implementation of practice guidelines and evidence-based treatments. In: Roberts AR, Yeager K (eds) Evidence-based practice manual: research and outcome measures in health and human services. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- O’Brien MA, Rogers S, Jamtvedt G, Oxman AD, Odgaard-Jensen J, Kristoffersen DT, Forsetlund L, Bainbridge D, Freemantle N, Davis DA et al (2007) Educational outreach visits: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 17(4):CD000409Google Scholar
- OECD (2010) Sickness, disability and work: breaking the Barriers. A Synthesis of findings across OECD countriesGoogle Scholar
- OECD (2011) Society at a glance 2011: OECD social indicators. OECD Publishing, ParisGoogle Scholar
- Oxman AD, Thomson MA, Davis DA, Haynes RB (1995) No magic bullets: a systematic review of 102 trials of interventions to improve professional practice. CMAJ Can Med Assoc J 153(10):1423–1431Google Scholar
- Ritchie J, Lewis J (2003) Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
- World Health Organization (2001) International classification of functioning, disability and healthGoogle Scholar