Advertisement

An educational intervention to improve knowledge about prevention against occupational asthma and allergies using targeted maximum likelihood estimation

  • Daloha Rodríguez-MolinaEmail author
  • Swaantje Barth
  • Ronald Herrera
  • Constanze Rossmann
  • Katja Radon
  • Veronika Karnowski
Original Article
  • 37 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

Occupational asthma and allergies are potentially preventable diseases affecting 5–15% of the working population. However, the use of preventive measures is often insufficient. The aim of this study was to estimate the average treatment effect of an educational intervention designed to improve the knowledge of preventive measures against asthma and allergies in farm apprentices from Bavaria (Southern Germany).

Methods

Farm apprentices at Bavarian farm schools were asked to complete a questionnaire evaluating their knowledge about preventive measures against occupational asthma and allergies (use of personal protective equipment, personal and workplace hygiene measures). Eligible apprentices were randomized by school site to either a control or an intervention group. The intervention consisted of a short educational video about use of preventive measures. Six months after the intervention, subjects were asked to complete a post-intervention questionnaire. Of the 116 apprentices (70 intervention group, 46 control group) who answered the baseline questionnaire, only 47 subjects (41%; 17 intervention group, 30 control group) also completed the follow-up questionnaire. We, therefore, estimated the causal effect of the intervention using targeted maximum likelihood estimation. Models were controlled for potential confounders.

Results

Based on the targeted maximum likelihood estimation, the intervention would have increased the proportion of correct answers on all six preventive measures by 18.4% (95% confidence interval 7.3–29.6%) had all participants received the intervention vs. had they all been in the control group.

Conclusions

These findings indicate the improvement of knowledge by the educational intervention.

Keywords

Occupational asthma and allergies Educational intervention Targeted maximum likelihood estimation Preventive measures Causal effect 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Special thanks to Jenny Schlichtiger for her valuable collaboration and hard work in the data collection process, and to Iven-Alex Heim for acting in the educational videos. The authors would also like to thank all farm apprentices who kindly participated in our study. Furthermore, we would like to thank Thomas Brendel and Thomas Bischoff from the Instituf für Didaktik und Ausbildungsforschung in der Medizin (LMU) for their help in creating the educational video.

Author contributions

Study conception and design: KR, CR, SB and VK; fieldwork and data collection: SB; data analysis: DRM and RH; interpretation of the data: DRM, KR and RH; drafting of the manuscript: DRM and KR. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by Gesund.Leben.Bayern. http://www.gesundheit.bayern.de.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics approval

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Munich (LMU) (Project no. 6–14). All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Supplementary material

420_2018_1397_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (261 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 260 KB)
420_2018_1397_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (309 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (PDF 308 KB)

Online Resource 3 Video 1, shown as part of the intervention (MP4 14105 KB)

Online Resource 4 Video 2, shown as part of the intervention (MP4 18398 KB)

References

  1. Ahern J, Karasek D, Luedtke AR et al (2016) Racial/ethnic differences in the role of childhood adversities for mental disorders among a nationally representative sample of adolescents. Epidemiology 27:697–704.  https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0000000000000507 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ameille J, Hamelin K, Andujar P et al (2013) Occupational asthma and occupational rhinitis: the United Airways disease model revisited. Occup Environ Med 70:471–475.  https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2012-101048 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Angrist JD (2003) Treatment effect heterogeneity in theory and practice. Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), BonnCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ayres JG, Boyd R, Cowie H, Hurley JF (2011) Costs of occupational asthma in the UK. Thorax 66:128–133.  https://doi.org/10.1136/thx.2010.136762 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baur X, Sigsgaard T, Aasen TB et al (2012) Guidelines for the management of work-related asthma. Eur Respir J 39:529–545.  https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00096111 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bayerisches Landesamt für Statistik und Datenverarbeitung (2014) Berufliche Schulen in Bayern. In: Schuljahr 2013/14. Bayerisches Landesamt für Statistik und Datenverarbeitung, MünchenGoogle Scholar
  7. Bettinghaus EP (1986) Health promotion and the knowledge-attitude-behavior continuum. Prev Med 15:475–491.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0091-7435(86)90025-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bonow CA, Cezar-Vaz MR, Almeida MCV de et al (2013) Risk perception and risk communication for training women apprentice welders: A challenge for public health nursing. Nurs Res Pract 2013:386260.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/386260 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Breen R, Choi S, Holm A (2015) Heterogeneous causal effects and sample selection bias. Sociol Sci 2:351–369.  https://doi.org/10.15195/v2.a17 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Burney PG, Luczynska C, Chinn S, Jarvis D (1994) The European Community Respiratory Health Survey. Eur Respir J 7:954–960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cezar-Vaz MR, Bonow CA, Vaz JC (2015) Risk communication concerning welding fumes for the primary preventive care of welding apprentices in southern Brazil. Int J Environ Res Public Health 12:986–1002.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120100986 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Colson KE, Rudolph KE, Zimmerman SC et al (2016) Optimizing matching and analysis combinations for estimating causal effects. Sci Rep 6:23222.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep23222 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Crippa M, Torri D, Fogliata L et al (2007) Implementation of a health education programme in a sample of hairdressing trainees. Med Lav 98:48–54Google Scholar
  14. Díaz I, Colantuoni E, Rosenblum M (2016) Enhanced precision in the analysis of randomized trials with ordinal outcomes. Biometrics 72:422–431.  https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.12450 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fewell Z, Davey Smith G, Sterne JAC (2007) The impact of residual and unmeasured confounding in epidemiologic studies: a simulation study. Am J Epidemiol 166:646–655.  https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwm165 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fischer K, White IR (2012) Causal inference in clinical trials. In: Berzuini C, Dawid P, Bernardinelli L (eds) Causality: statistical perspectives and applications. Wiley, Ltd, pp 310–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Grimmer J, Messing S, Westwood SJ (2017) Estimating heterogeneous treatment effects and the effects of heterogeneous treatments with ensemble methods. Polit Anal 25:413–434.  https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2017.15 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gruber S, Laan MJ van der (2010) A targeted maximum likelihood estimator of a causal effect on a bounded continuous outcome. Int J Biostat.  https://doi.org/10.2202/1557-4679.1260 (Article 26)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gruber S, Laan MJ van der (2012) Tmle: an R package for targeted maximum likelihood estimation. J Stat Softw 51:1–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hainich R (2010) Fehlerkultur in der Ausbildung auf der Intensivstation. Intensiv 18:62–69.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1251485 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Imai K, Ratkovic M (2013) Estimating treatment effect heterogeneity in randomized program evaluation. Ann Appl Stat 7:443–470.  https://doi.org/10.1214/12-AOAS593 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kim J, Arrandale VH, Kudla I et al (2012) Educational intervention among farmers in a community health care setting. Occup Med (Lond) 62:458–461.  https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqs129 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kütting B, Weistenhöfer W, Baumeister T et al (2009) Current acceptance and implementation of preventive strategies for occupational hand eczema in 1355 metalworkers in Germany. Br J Dermatol 161:390–396.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2009.09085.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Laan MJ van der, Rose S (2011) Targeted learning: causal inference for observational and experimental data. Springer Science & Business Media, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Laan MJ van der, Gruber S (2012) Targeted minimum loss based estimation of causal effects of multiple time point interventions. Int J Biostat 8(1)9.  https://doi.org/10.1515/1557-4679.1370 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Laan MJ van der, Polley EC, Hubbard AE (2007) Super learner. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol.  https://doi.org/10.2202/1544-6115.1309 (Article25)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lee BK, Lessler J, Stuart EA (2010) Improving propensity score weighting using machine learning. Stat Med 29:337–346.  https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.3782 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lendle S (2015a) Tmlecte: estimates the NDE and ATT with TMLE. R package available at https://github.com/lendle/tmlecte
  29. Lendle SD (2015b) Targeted minimum loss based estimation: applications and extensions in causal inference and big data. PhD thesis, UC BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  30. Lendle SD, Fireman B, Laan MJ van der (2013a) Targeted maximum likelihood estimation in safety analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 66:S91–S98.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.02.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lendle SD, Subbaraman MS, Laan MJ van der (2013b) Identification and efficient estimation of the natural direct effect among the untreated. Biometrics 69:310–317.  https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.12022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Levesque DL, Arif AA, Shen J (2012) Effectiveness of pesticide safety training and knowledge about pesticide exposure among Hispanic farmworkers. J Occup Environ Med 54:1550–1556.  https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0b013e3182677d96 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ling TC, Coulson IH (2002) What do trainee hairdressers know about hand dermatitis? Contact Derm 47:227–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Luque-Fernandez MA, Schomaker M, Rachet B, Schnitzer ME (2018) Targeted maximum likelihood estimation for a binary treatment: A tutorial. Stat Med 37:2530–2546.  https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.7628 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mahmud N, Schonstein E, Schaafsma F et al (2010) Pre-employment examinations for preventing occupational injury and disease in workers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.  https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008881 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Moscato G, Pala G, Boillat MA et al (2011) EAACI position paper: Prevention of work-related respiratory allergies among pre-apprentices or apprentices and young workers. Allergy 66:1164–1173.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1398-9995.2011.02615.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Muth T, Bahemann A, Voß HJ, Borsch-Galetke E (2005) Gesundheitlich begründete Ausbildungsabbrüche. Arbeitsmedizin, Sozialmedizin, Umweltmedizin 40:182Google Scholar
  38. Nixon R, Roberts H, Frowen K, Sim M (2006) Knowledge of skin hazards and the use of gloves by Australian hairdressing students and practising hairdressers. Contact Derm 54:112–116.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0105-1873.2006.00790.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Patuzzi M (2012) Ausbildungsreport 2012 Bayern. DGB-Jugend Bayern, MunichGoogle Scholar
  40. Peden D, Reed CE (2010) Environmental and occupational allergies. J Allergy Clin Immunol 125:S150–S160.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2009.10.073 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Peres F, Rodrigues KM, Silva Peixoto Belo MS da et al (2013) Design of risk communication strategies based on risk perception among farmers exposed to pesticides in Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil. Am J Ind Med 56:77–89.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.22147 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Petersen ML, Porter KE, Gruber S et al (2012) Diagnosing and responding to violations in the positivity assumption. Stat Methods Med Res 21:31–54.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0962280210386207 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pirracchio R, Petersen ML, Laan M van der (2015) Improving propensity score estimators’ robustness to model misspecification using super learner. Am J Epidemiol 181:108–119.  https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwu253 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Polley E, LeDell E, Laan M van der (2016) SuperLearner: super learner prediction. R package documentation available at https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/SuperLearner/index.html
  45. Pounds L, Duysen E, Romberger D et al (2014) Social marketing campaign promoting the use of respiratory protection devices among farmers. J Agromed 19:316–324.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1059924X.2014.917350 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. R Core Team (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Available at: https://www.rproject.org/
  47. Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB (1983) The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70:41–55.  https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/70.1.41 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rubin DB (1974) Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. J Educ Psychol 66:688–701.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0037350 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rubin DB (1978) Bayesian inference for causal effects: the role of randomization. Ann Stat 6:34–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Samii C, Paler L, Daly SZ (2016) Retrospective causal inference with machine learning ensembles: an application to anti-recidivism policies in Colombia. Polit Anal 24:434–456.  https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpw019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schnitzer ME, Laan MJ van der, Moodie EEM, Platt RW (2014) Effect of breastfeeding on gastrointestinal infection in infants: a targeted maximum likelihood approach for clustered longitudinal data. Ann Appl Stat 8:703–725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Seifried J, Baumgartner A (2009) Lernen aus Fehlern in der betrieblichen Ausbildung—Problemfeld und möglicher Forschungszugang. In: bwp@ Berufs- und Wirtschaftspädagogik online. 17Google Scholar
  53. Tarlo SM, Lemiere C (2014) Occupational asthma. N Engl J Med 370:640–649.  https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1301758 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tarlo SM, Liss GM (2005) Prevention of occupational asthma–practical implications for occupational physicians. Occup Med (Lond) 55:588–594.  https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqi182 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Vandenplas O, Dressel H, Wilken D et al (2011) Management of occupational asthma: cessation or reduction of exposure? A systematic review of available evidence. Eur Respir J 38:804–811.  https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00177510 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Vanderweele TJ, Arah OA (2011) Bias formulas for sensitivity analysis of unmeasured confounding for general outcomes, treatments, and confounders. Epidemiology 22:42–52.  https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181f74493 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Xie Y, Brand JE, Jann B (2012) Estimating heterogeneous treatment effects with observational data. Sociol Methodol 42:314–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology and NetTeaching Unit, Institute and Outpatient Clinic for Occupational, Social and Environmental MedicineUniversity Hospital of Munich (LMU)MunichGermany
  2. 2.Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology (IBE)Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich (LMU)MunichGermany
  3. 3.Department of Media and Communication SciencesUniversity of ErfurtErfurtGermany
  4. 4.Department of Communication Studies and Media Research (IfKW)Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich (LMU)MunichGermany

Personalised recommendations