Prognostic effects of selection, optimization and compensation strategies on work ability: results from the representative lidA cohort study on work, age, and health in Germany
- 97 Downloads
Regarding the increased need for the retention of older employees in the workforce, this study investigates whether there are main and interactive longitudinal effects of selection, optimization, compensation and working conditions according to the job demand–control model on work ability in older employees.
Longitudinal data of computer-assisted personal interviews with one follow-up after 3 years of 3961 participants (born in 1959 and 1965) of the representative German lidA cohort study was used. Multiple linear regressions were performed, analyzing prospective main and interactive effects of selection, optimization, compensation and working conditions during baseline on perceived work ability at follow-up.
Regarding selection, optimization and compensation, only compensation had a positive, but weak effect on work ability. Working conditions were more strongly related to work ability: decision authority and skill discretion had independent positive and job demands had independent negative effects on work ability. One interaction effect was observed between loss-based selection and decision authority, such that they mutually enhanced their positive effects on work ability. Only few and weak interactions among the sub-strategies, selection, optimization and compensation, were observed.
Results indicate that especially favorable working conditions in terms of high job control and low job demands, but also compensation might help older employees to maintain work ability.
KeywordsWork ability Selection, optimization, compensation Working conditions Older workers Cohort study
The research was financed in the frame of the lidA study by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) under the Project Numbers 01 ER 0806, 01 ER 0825, 01 ER 0826, 01 ER 0827.
Compliance with ethical standards
Research involving human participants and/or animals
The research project was approved by the ethics committee of the University of Wuppertal (December 5th, 2008).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Alcântara MA, Sampaio RF, Assunção A, Silva FCM (2014) Work Ability: using structural equation modeling to assess the effects of aging, health and work on the population of Brazilian municipal employees. Work (Reading Mass) 49:465–472Google Scholar
- Baltes PB, Baltes MM, Freund AM, Lang F (1999) The measurement of selection, optimization, and compensation (SOC) by self report: technical report 1999. Max-Planck-Institut für Bildungsforschung, Berlin, GermanyGoogle Scholar
- Becker A, Angerer P, Muller A (2017) The prevention of musculoskeletal complaints: a randomized controlled trial on additional effects of a work-related psychosocial coaching intervention compared to physiotherapy alone. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 90:357–371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-017-1202-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bernburg M, Vitzthum K, Groneberg DA, Mache S (2016) Physicians’ occupational stress, depressive symptoms and work ability in relation to their working environment: a cross-sectional study of differences among medical residents with various specialties working in German hospitals. BMJ Open 6:e011369. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011369 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Freund AM, Baltes PB (2000) The orchestration of selection, optimization, and compensation: an action-theoretical conceptualization of a theory of developmental regulation. In: Perrig WJ, Grob A (eds) Control of human behaviour, mental processes and consciousness. Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 35–58Google Scholar
- Hasselhorn H-M, Freude G (2007) Der Work-ability-Index: Ein Leitfaden. Wirtschaftsverl. NW, Verlag für Neue Wiss, BremerhavenGoogle Scholar
- Ilmarinen J, Tuomi K (1992) Work ability of aging workers. Scand JWork Environ Health 18(Suppl 2):8–10Google Scholar
- Ilmarinen J, Tuomi K, Klockars M (1997) Changes in the work ability of active employees over an 11-year period. Scand J Work Environ Health 23(Suppl 1):49–57Google Scholar
- Koolhaas W, van der Klink JJ, de Boer MR, Groothoff JW, Brouwer S (2014) Chronic health conditions and work ability in the ageing workforce: the impact of work conditions, psychosocial factors and perceived health. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 87:433–443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-013-0882-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Leijon O, Balliu N, Lundin A, Vaez M, Kjellberg K, Hemmingsson T (2017) Effects of psychosocial work factors and psychological distress on self-assessed work ability: a 7-year follow-up in a general working population. Am J Ind Med 60:121–130. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.22670 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Müller A (2016) Die Förderung der psychischen Gesundheit von Beschäftigten - Ein Überblick über die Wirksamkeit und Erfolgsfaktoren partizipativer verhältnisbezogener Interventionen. im Betrieb Wirtschaftspsychologie 18:40–47Google Scholar
- Müller A, Weigl M, Heiden B, Herbig B, Glaser J, Angerer P (2013) Selection, optimization, and compensation in nursing: exploration of job-specific strategies, scale development, and age-specific associations to work ability. J Adv Nurs 69:1630–1642. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nübling M, Vomstein M, Nübling T, Stößel U, Hasselhorn H-M, Hofmann F (2011) Erfassung psychischer Belastungen anhand eines erprobten Fragebogens–Aufbau der COPSOQ-Datenbank. Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin, Dortmund (Projektnummer F2031)Google Scholar
- Riedel N, Müller A, Ebener M (2015) Applying strategies of selection, optimization, and compensation to maintain work ability—a psychosocial resource complementing the job demand-control model? Results from the representative lida cohort study on work, age, and health in Germany. J Occup Environ Med 57:552–561. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000000402 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Spector PE, Brannick MT (2009) Common method variance or measurement bias? The problem and possible solutions. In: Buchanan D, Bryman A (eds) Handbook of organizational research methods, vol 10. Sage, London, pp 346–362Google Scholar
- Steinwede J, Kleugden M, Häring A, Schröder H (2015) Methodenbericht zur Haupterhebung lidA - leben in der Arbeit, 2. Welle. Forschungsdatenzentrum (FDZ) der Bundesagentur. für Arbeit im Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung, NürnbergGoogle Scholar
- Tuomi K, Ilmarinen J, Eskelinen L, Jarvinen E, Toikkanen J, Klockars M (1991) Prevalence and incidence rates of diseases and work ability in different work categories of municipal occupations Scand. J Work Environ Health 17(Suppl 1):67–74Google Scholar
- Tuomi K, Ilmarinen J, Jahkola A, Katajarinne L, Tulkki A (1999) Work ability index, 2nd edn. Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
- von Bonsdorff ME, von Bonsdorff MB, Zhou ZE, Kauppinen M, Miettinen M, Rantanen T, Vanhala S (2014) Organizational justice, selection, optimization with compensation, and nurses’ work ability. J Occup Environ Med Am Coll Occup Environ Med 56:326–330. https://doi.org/10.1097/jom.0000000000000102 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wirth H, Gresch C, Müller W, Pollak R, Weiss F (2009) Validating the ESeC-scheme as operationalization of social class: The case of Germany vol Arbeitspapiere - Mannheimer Zentrum für Europäische Sozialforschung: 119. MannheimGoogle Scholar