Advertisement

Work overcommitment: Is it a trait or a state?

  • Jean-Baptist du PrelEmail author
  • Roma Runeson-Broberg
  • Peter Westerholm
  • Lars Alfredsson
  • Göran Fahlén
  • Anders Knutsson
  • Maria Nordin
  • Richard Peter
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

Effort–reward imbalance (ERI) is a well-tested work-related stress model with three components, the two extrinsic components “efforts” and “rewards” and the one intrinsic component “overcommitment”. While an imbalance between “efforts” and “rewards” leads to strain reactions, “work-related overcommitment” (OC) has been described as a personal characteristic with a set of attitudes, behaviours, and emotions reflecting excessive striving combined with a strong desire for approval. However, the question whether OC is a personality trait or a response pattern sensitive to changes in the work context (state) is still open.

Methods

2940 Swedish industrial employees were included in this longitudinal analysis of the WOLF-Norrland data over 5 years. A change of OC index or its subscales were regressed against a change of freedom of choice at work, extra work, and ERI adjusted for age, sex, and education.

Results

While OC was insensitive to changes in freedom of choice at work and extra work, it was clearly associated with changes of work-related stress over time. Three of four OC subscales exhibited statistically significant associations with ERI.

Conclusions

For the first time, we studied fundamental characteristics of OC as an independent personality variable (trait) or an outcome variable subject to changes in the work environment (state). The association between external ERI and OC over time supports our hypothesis of OC being a state. Further investigations are needed to establish OC as a trait or a state.

Keywords

Work stress models Coping Work organisation Organisational change 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Swedish Working Life and Social Sciences Foundation (FORTE) under Grant Number 2012-2022; and by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research under Grant Numbers FKZ 01ER0827, 01ER0825, 01ER0806, and 01ER0826.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Funding

The study was funded by the Swedish Working Life and Social Sciences Foundation (FORTE) under Grant Number 2012-2022; and by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research under Grant Numbers FKZ 01ER0827, 01ER0825, 01ER0806, and 01ER0826.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Aust B, Peter R, Siegrist J (1997) Stress management in bus drivers: a pilot study based on the model of effort-reward imbalance. Int J Stress Manag 4:297–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Backé E, Seidler A, Latza U, Rossnagel K, Schumann B (2012) The role of psychosocial stress at work for the development of cardiovascular diseases: a systematic review. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 85:67–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. du Prel JB, Peter R (2015) Work-family conflict as a mediator in the association between work stress and depressive symptoms: cross-sectional evidence from the German lidA-cohort study. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 88:359–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fahlén G (2008) Aspects of the effort reward imbalance model of psychosocial stress in the work environment. Dissertation, Mid University SwedenGoogle Scholar
  5. Fahlén G, Peter R, Knutsson A (2004) The effort-reward imbalance model of psychosocial stress at the workplace—a comparison of ERI exposure assessment using two estimation methods. Work Stress 18:81–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fahlén G, Knutsson A, Peter R, Åkerstedt T, Nordin M, Alfredsson L, Westerholm P (2006) Effort-reward imbalance, sleep disturbances and fatigue. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 79:371–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. George D, Mallery P (2016) IBM SPSS statistics 23 step by step. A simple guide and reference, 14th edn. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Gilbert-Ouimet M, Trude X, Brisson C, Milot A, Vézina M (2014) Adverse effects of psychosocial work factors on blood pressure: systematic review of studies on demand-control-support and effort-reward imbalance models. Scand J Work Environ Health 40:109–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Godin I, Kittel F (2004) Differential economic stability and psychosocial stress at work: associations with psychosomatic complaints and absenteeism. Soc Sci Med 58:1543–1553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hanson EK, Schaufeli W, Vrijkotte T, Plomp NH, Godaert GL (2000) The validity and reliability of the Dutch Effort-Reward Imbalance Questionnaire. J Occup Health Psychol 5:142–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hasselhorn HM, Peter R, Rauch A, Schroeder H, Swart E, Bender S, du Prel JB, Ebener M, March S, Trappmann M, Steinwede J, Mueller BH (2014) Cohort profile: the lidA Cohort Study—a German Cohort Study on work, age, health and work participation. Int J Epidemiol 43:1736–1749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hintsa T, Hintsanen M, Jokela M, Pulkki-Raback L, Keltikangas-Järvinen L (2013) Effort-reward imbalance at work is predicted by temporal and energetic characteristics of behaviour: a population-based study. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 26:413–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Joksimovic L, Starke D, van der Knesebeck O, Siegrist J (2002) Perceived work stress, overcommitment, and self-reported musculoskeletal pain: a cross-sectional investigation. Int J Behav Med 9:122–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lau B (2008) Effort-reward imbalance and overcommitment in employees in a Norwegian municipality: a cross sectional study. J Occup Med Toxicol 3:9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Loerbroks A, Gadinger MC, Bosch JA, Sturmer T, Ml Amelang (2010) Work-related stress, inability to relax after work and risk of adult asthma: a population based cohort study. Allergy 65:1298–1305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Matschinger H, Siegrist J, Siegrist K, Dittmann KH (1986) Type A as a coping career-toward a conceptual and methodological redefinition. In: Schmidt TH, Dembroski TM, Blumchen G (eds) Biological and psychological factors in cardiovascular disease. Springer, Berlin, pp 104–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Peter R, Siegrist J (1999) Chronic psychosocial stress at work and cardiovascular disease: the role of effort-reward imbalance. Int J Law Psychiatry 22:441–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Peter R, Alfredsson L, Hammar N, Siegrist J, Theorell T, Westerholm P (1998) High effort, low reward and cardiovascular risk factors in employed Swedish men and women: baseline results from the WOLF- Study. J Epidemiol Community Health 52:540–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Peter R, Siegrist J, Hallqvist J, Reuterwall C, Theorell T, the SHEEP Study Group (2002) Psychosocial work environment and myocardial infarction: improving risk estimation by combining two complementary job stress models in the SHEEP study. J Epidemiol Community Health 56:294–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Peter R, March S, du Prel JB (2016) Are status inconsistency, work stress and work-family conflict associated with depressive symptoms? Testing prospective evidence in the lidA study. Soc Sci Med 151:100–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Preckel D, von Känel R, Kudielka BM, Fischer JE (2005) Overcommitment to work is associated with vital exhaustion. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 78:117–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Raghunathan TE, Lepkowski JM, Van Hoewyk J, Solenberger P (2001) A multivariate technique for multiply imputing missing values using a sequence of regression models. Survey Methodol 27:85–95. http://hbanaszak.mjr.uw.edu.pl/TempTxt/RaghunathanEtAl_2001_MultivariateTechniqueForMultiplyImputingMissingValuesUsingASequenceOfRegressionModels.PDF. Accessed 31 Oct 2016
  23. Schmitt N (1996) Uses and abuses of coefficient alpha. Psychol Assess 8:350–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Siegrist J (1996) Soziale Krisen und Gesundheit [Social Crisis and Health]. Hogrefe, GöttingenGoogle Scholar
  25. Siegrist J (2002) Effort-reward imbalance at work and health. In: Ganster DC, Perrewé PL (eds) Historical and current perspectives on stress and health. JAI Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 261–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Siegrist J, Li J (2016) Associations of extrinsic and intrinsic components of work stress with health: a systematic review of evidence on the effort-reward imbalance Model. Int J Environ Res Public Health 13:432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Siegrist J, Starke D, Chandola T, Godin I, Marmot M, Niedhammer I, Peter R (2004) The measurement of effort-reward imbalance at work: European comparisons. Soc Sci Med 58:1483–1499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Siegrist J, Wege N, Pühlhofer F, Wahrendorf M (2009) A short generic measure of work stress in the era of globalization: effort-reward imbalance. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 82:1005–1013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Siegrist J, Dragano N, Nyberg ST, Lunau T, Alfredsson L, Erbel R et al (2014) Validating abbreviated measures of effort-reward imbalance at work in European cohort studies: the IPD-Work consortium. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 87:249–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sorenson MR, Harris BA (2012) Personality contructs and the stress process. In: Rice VH (ed) Handbook of stress, coping, and health, 2nd edn. SAGE, Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington DC, pp 334–354Google Scholar
  31. Sperlich S, Arnhold-Kerri S, Siegrist J, Geyer S (2013) The mismatch between high effort and low reward in household and family work predicts impaired health among mothers. Eur J Public Health 23:893–898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Van Vegchel N, de Jonge J, Bosma H, Schaufeli WB (2005) Reviewing the effort reward imbalance model: drawing up the balance of 45 empirical studies. Soc Sci Med 60:1117–1131CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of the History, Philosophy and Ethics of MedicineUlm UniversityUlmGermany
  2. 2.Department of Occupational Health ScienceUniversity of WuppertalWuppertalGermany
  3. 3.Occupational and Environmental MedicineUppsala University HospitalUppsalaSweden
  4. 4.Institute of Environmental MedicineKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
  5. 5.Centre for Occupational and Environmental MedicineStockholm County CouncilStockholmSweden
  6. 6.The National Agency for Special Needs Education and SchoolsHärnösandSweden
  7. 7.Department of Health SciencesMid Sweden UniversitySundsvallSweden
  8. 8.Department of PsychologyUmeå UniversityUmeaSweden
  9. 9.Stress Research InstituteStockholm UniversityStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations