Victimization from workplace bullying after a traumatic event: time-lagged relationships with symptoms of posttraumatic stress
- 413 Downloads
This study examined relationships between victimization from bullying and symptoms of posttraumatic stress (PTSS) after exposure to a terror attack at the workplace. It was hypothesized that (1) victims of bullying report higher and more stable levels of PTSS over time compared to their non-bullied colleagues and (2) that PTSS provides an increased risk of subsequent victimization from bullying.
The hypotheses were tested in a two-wave prospective sample comprising 2337 employees from Norwegian governmental ministries who were exposed to the 2011 Oslo terror attack. The two waves of data collection were conducted 10 and 22 months after the terror attack.
Hypothesis 1 was partially supported: victims of bullying reported significantly higher levels of PTSS than non-bullied employees at both measurement points, but bullying was not related to the stability in PTSS over time. In support of hypothesis 2, PTSS at 10 months was significantly associated with an increased risk of feeling victimized by bullying 1 year later.
The results indicate that victimization from bullying is associated with elevated levels of PTSS in the aftermath of a workplace terror attack, but that bullying does not have any impact on the long-term development of PTSS. PTSS may be a potential antecedent of bullying. These findings suggest that organizations must give high priority to the psychosocial work environment of traumatized employees to prevent further detrimental health consequences.
KeywordsAggression Trauma PTSD Longitudinal Polyvictimization
The authors thank the participating governmental departments and employees for their willingness to participate.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
- Calhoun LG, Tedeschi RG (2006) Handbook of posttraumatic growth: research & practice. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, MahwahGoogle Scholar
- Dallner M et al. (2000) Validation of the General Nordic Questionnaire (QPSNordic) for psychological and social factors at work. Nordic Council of Ministers, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
- Einarsen S, Hoel H, Zapf D, Cooper CL (2011) The concept of bullying and harassment at work: the European tradition. In: Einarsen S, Hoel H, Zapf D, Cooper CL (eds) Bullying and harassment in the workplace developments in theory, research, and practice. 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, p 3–40Google Scholar
- Gillihan SJ, Cahill SP, Foa EB (2014) Chapter: psychological theories of PTSD handbook of PTSD: science and practice (2nd ed). Guilford Press, New York, p 166–184Google Scholar
- Hansen MB, Birkeland MS, Nissen A, Blix I, Solberg Ø, Heir T (In press) Prevalence and course of symptom-defined PTSD in individuals directly or indirectly exposed to terror - a longitudinal study. Psychiatry. doi: 10.1080/00332747.2016.1230983
- Hem C, Hussain A, Wentzel-Larsen T, Heir T (2012) The Norwegian version of the PTSD checklist (PCL): construct validity in a community sample of 2004 tsunami survivors. Nordic J Psychiatry (0):1–5Google Scholar
- Høgh A, Mikkelsen EG, Hansen ÅM (2011) Individual consequences of workplace bullying/mobbing. In: Einarsen S, Hoel H, Zapf D, Cooper CL (eds) Bullying and harassment in the workplace developments in theory, research, and practice. 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, p 107–128Google Scholar
- Hu L, Bentler PM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model 6:1–55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118
- Janoff-Bulman R (1992) Shattered assumptions. Towards a new psychology of trauma. The Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Malinauskiene V, Einarsen S (2014) Workplace bullying and posttraumatic stress symptoms among family physicians in Lithuania: an occupation and region specific approach. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 27(6):919.932Google Scholar
- Matthiesen SB, Einarsen S (2001) MMPI-2 configurations among victims of bullying at work. Eur J Work Org Psychol 32:335–356Google Scholar
- Mills MA et al. (2011) Shattered assumptions? A prospective study: the impact of trauma on global beliefs and adjustment. Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, Dissertation, Abstracts InternationalGoogle Scholar
- Muthén B, Muthén LK (1998–2013) Mplus (version 7.11). Muthén & Muthén, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
- Nielsen MB, Notelaers G, Einarsen S (2011) Measuring exposure to workplace bullying. In: Einarsen S, Hoel H, Zapf D, Cooper CL (eds) Bullying and emotional abuse in the workplace developments in theory, research and practice. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
- Olweus D (1993) Bullying at schools: what we know and what we can do. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Satorra A, Bentler PM (2001) A scaled difference Chi square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika 66(4):507–514Google Scholar
- Spector PE, Fox S (2005) The stressor-emotion model of counterproductive work behavior. In: Fox S, Spector PE (eds) Counterproductive behavior Investigations of actors and targets. American Psychological Association, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- Verkuil B, Atasayi S, Molendijk ML (2015) Workplace bullying and mental health: a meta-analysis on cross-sectional and longitudinal data. Plos One 10(8)Google Scholar
- Weathers F, Litz BT, Herman DS, Huska JA, Keane TM (1993) The PTSD checklist (PCL): reliability, validity, and diagnostic utility. Annual meeting of the international society for traumatic stress studies, San AntonioGoogle Scholar