Psychological approach of occupational health service to sick leave due to mental problems: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- 472 Downloads
The effects of interventions by occupational health services on sick leave prompted by psychiatric disorders were examined with respect to intervention method and the number of sick leave days.
The intervention methods used by occupational health services were systematically reviewed by searching three databases and manual searching. A meta-analysis of the number of sick leave days comparing the intervention group [intervention + care as usual (CAU)] and control group (CAU alone) was performed. In addition, subanalyses were conducted for the duration until sick-listed workers’ return to work after sick leave (Subgroup 1) and the number of non-sick-listed workers’ total sick leave days (Subgroup 2).
Ten studies were extracted and integrated, and the subjects were subsequently sorted into the intervention group (n = 434, 322, and 756 in subgroup 1, subgroup 2, and total, respectively) and control group (n = 413, 385, and 798 in subgroup 1, subgroup 2, and total, respectively). All studies employed an intervention method of problem-solving treatment or cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). There were no significant differences between the intervention and control groups in subgroup 1 or 2. However, the combined intervention group had significantly fewer total sick leave days than the combined control group (mean difference −6.64 days, 95 % CI −12.68 to −0.59, I 2 = 0 %).
The combined study of sick-listed and non-sick-listed workers indicates occupational health services implement problem-solving treatment or CBT interventions, which can shorten total sick leave duration.
KeywordsMental illness Meta-analysis Occupational health services Return to work Sick leave
We are grateful to Yasuhito Hirai, Naoaki Sho, and Shun Suzuki for their help.
Conflict of interest
Shotaro Doki, Shinichiro Sasahara, and Ichiyo Matsuzaki declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Anema JR, Jettinghoff K, Houtman I, Schoemaker CG, Buijs PC, van den Berg R (2006) Medical care of employees long-term sick listed due to mental health problems: a cohort study to describe and compare the care of the occupational physician and the general practitioner. J Occup Rehabil 16:41–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kant I, Jansen NW, van Amelsvoort LG, van Leusden R, Berkouwer A (2008) Structured early consultation with the occupational physician reduces sickness absence among office workers at high risk for long-term sickness absence: a randomized controlled trial. J Occup Rehabil 18:79–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mynors-Wallis L (2005) Problem-solving treatment for anxiety and depression. Oxford University Press, UKGoogle Scholar
- van der Feltz-Cornelis CM, Hoedeman R, de Jong FJ, Meeuwissen JA, Drewes HW, van der Ader HJ (2010) Faster return to work after psychiatric consultation for sicklisted employees with common mental disorders compared to care as usual. A randomized clinical trial. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 6:375–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Vlasveld MC, van der Feltz-Cornelis CM, Adèr HJ, Anema JR, Hoedeman R, van Mechelen W et al (2013) Collaborative care for sick-listed workers with major depressive disorder: a randomised controlled trial from the Netherlands depression initiative aimed at return to work and depressive symptoms. Occup Environ Med 70:223–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wang J, Smailes E, Sareen J, Fick GH, Schmitz N, Patten SB (2010) The prevalence of mental disorders in the working population over the period of global economic crisis. Can J Psychiatry 55:598–605Google Scholar
- WHO (2003) Investing in mental health. Geneva: World Health Organization 2003Google Scholar
- WHO (2008) The global burden of disease: 2004 update. Geneva: World Health Organization 2008Google Scholar